[cisco-voip] Forward Unregistered CTI Ports with UCCX

Fuermann, Jason JBF005 at shsu.edu
Mon Jul 26 12:37:21 EDT 2010


I think the problem you're going to run into is if you data resync in UCCX. It will overwrite the CFUR. As far as messing up UCCX, I'm not a developer on it, but I highly doubt it.

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 10:31 AM
To: Steve G
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Forward Unregistered CTI Ports with UCCX

If UCCX doesn't support setting the CFUR then I would like to think it would ignore the field entirely.  You can sure as heck test it, and I'd also be asking your CSE what version of UCCX will support this field in CUCM and if there is a bug to track it.

-Ryan

On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Steve G wrote:

We are on CUCM 7.1.3 and it is supported in this version of CUCM.  However, the TAC rep says it is not supported with UCCX and could cause Jtapi issues is you are not supposed to configure anything on the CTI RP in CUCM, but do it all on UCCX.  Also, let's say we set the CTI RP to Forward Unregistered, and then updated Jtapi.  Wouldn't that clear out the forward unregistered settings?
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Tanner Ezell <tanner.ezell at gmail.com<mailto:tanner.ezell at gmail.com>> wrote:
It's not really a UCCX thing. What version of UCM? If you're version
supports forward on unregistered then that's all you can do..

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Steve G <smgustafson at gmail.com<mailto:smgustafson at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Anyone???  going once, going twice...
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Steve G <smgustafson at gmail.com<mailto:smgustafson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I meant CTI Route Points...not CTI Ports.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Steve G <smgustafson at gmail.com<mailto:smgustafson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In UCCX is there a way to configure a CTI Port to forward Unregistered to
>>> anther number...ie Hunt Pilot?  We are running into an issue where CTI ports
>>> become unregistered and don't recover without manual intervention of
>>> updating the jtapi triggers in UCCX.  We have a TAC rep saying that we can
>>> not modify the CTI ports in CUCM as that is not supported. So if UCCX has a
>>> jtapi problem we are dead in the water until we can login and update/resync
>>> the jtapi triggers.
>>> I am extremely new to UCCX so please forgive me if my terminology is
>>> wacky.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100726/88200355/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list