[cisco-voip] Call Reject not working on voice port...

[Jonathan Charles]

Yeah, apparently my PRI was not picking up the remote call reject.... I only
figured it out after seeing the call-reject on the remote PRI...


Jonathan

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:

> Wow, what odd behavior.  I would expect a fast-busy.  Also, I noticed in
> your test below the first line says Skipping and the last line says Matched
> yet the number= is the same on both.
>
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:49 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
> OK, now I am starting to wonder if it was working the whole time...
>
> The calls are being rejected, but they are still ringing on the calling
> side...
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Did it on the inbound peers and moved it off the voice port....
>>
>> Call is not blocked... and translation isn't invoked.
>>
>>
>> !
>> dial-peer voice 100 pots
>>
>>  call-block translation-profile incoming BLOCKED
>>  call-block disconnect-cause incoming call-reject
>>  incoming called-number .
>>  direct-inward-dial
>>
>>  port 0/0/0:23
>> !
>> dial-peer voice 101 pots
>>
>>  call-block translation-profile incoming BLOCKED
>>  call-block disconnect-cause incoming call-reject
>>  incoming called-number .
>>  direct-inward-dial
>>  port 0/0/1:23
>>
>>
>> However, if I test it...
>>
>> HTACHI525a#test voice translation-rule 2 6305551212
>> 6302192766 blocked on rule 1
>> HTACHI525a#
>> .Mar  4 23:28:15: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_match: Skipping a call
>> block rule; number=6305551212 rule precedence=1
>> .Mar  4 23:28:15: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_match: more digits
>> needed; number=6305551212 rule precedence=2
>> .Mar  4 23:28:15: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_match: No match;
>> number=6305551212 rule precedence=3
>> .Mar  4 23:28:15: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_rule_match: partial
>> match found, partial_match 2
>> .Mar  4 23:28:15: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_match: Matched a call
>> block rule; number=6305551212 rule precedence=1
>> HTACHI525a#
>>
>>
>> On an actual call, you see no debug output.
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Not valid on the voice port.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Mathew Miller <miller.mathew at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Try this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> voice-port 0/0/0:23
>>>>  call-block translation-profile incoming BLOCKED
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > So, I have the following translation:
>>>> >
>>>> > voice translation-rule 2
>>>> >  rule 1 reject /^6305551212$/
>>>> >
>>>> > voice translation-profile BLOCKED
>>>> >  translate calling 2
>>>> > !
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > voice-port 0/0/0:23
>>>> >  translation-profile incoming BLOCKED
>>>> >  bearer-cap Speech
>>>> > !
>>>> >
>>>> > Router#test voice translation-rule 2 6305551212
>>>> > 6305551212 blocked on rule 1
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Mar  4 17:17:48: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_match: Skipping a
>>>> call block rule; number=6305551212rule precedence=1
>>>> > .Mar  4 17:17:48: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_match: more digits
>>>> needed; number=6305551212 rule precedence=2
>>>> > .Mar  4 17:17:48: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_match: No match;
>>>> number=6305551212 rule precedence=3
>>>> > .Mar  4 17:17:48: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_rule_match:
>>>> partial match found, partial_match 2
>>>> > .Mar  4 17:17:48:
>>>> //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_match_internal: partial match
>>>> found with rule 2 ruleset 2
>>>> > .Mar  4 17:17:48:
>>>> //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_subst_internal: partial match
>>>> found doing regxrule_profile_match
>>>> >
>>>> > And the call progresses fine to its destination.
>>>> >
>>>> > It appears the call reject via translation doesn't do anything, the
>>>> very first line of the debug says it is just skipping the rule...
>>>> >
>>>> > What is going on here?
>>>> >
>>>> > Why does this not work...
>>>> >
>>>> > This is a 2851 running 12.4.24T2
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Jonathan
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100305/f9ff8c68/attachment.html>