[cisco-voip] SIP-Trunk with To-Header

[Jefflin Choi]

Thank you for those information guys!

@nick, yeah, it would be easier if there is a CUBE if only client wants it.


On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> "Normalization for SIP Trunks" is not yet in CUCM.
>
> /Wes
>
> On Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:21:17 PM, Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> If there was a CUBE involved you can use TCL scripts.  I can't speak
> for the capabilities of CUCM in the direct case, but this is one of
> the reasons you would put a CUBE between your CUCM and SIP trunk.
>
> -nick
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Jefflin Choi <jefflin.choi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> It seems like the SBC has the capability to re-edit therequest-URI so
> my problem is solved. Anyway, i still want to know if this is possible
> in case i encounter similar scenario on future implementation where
> sip provider still uses TO - field.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Jefflin Choi <jefflin.choi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Cisco seems to use Request-URI for incoming calls. Our SIP providers
> seems to use to-field.
>
> From  logs, it seems the request-URI and To field that provider is
> sending are different. Provider is claiming that they can't edit the
> request-uri field. I am still asking them to doublecheck.
>
> I know that they are not conforming with rfc3261 .. " The initial
> Request-URI of the message SHOULD be set to the value of the URI in
> the To field."
>
> Anyhow, just would like to ask if the CCM7 has a way to use the
> to-field instead of request-URI.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>