[cisco-voip] Is anyone using Unity Connection 8.0.1?

[Tanner Ezell]

I think Cisco's level of QA has improved over the last couple years in
regards to releases. It seems like there are less and less problems.

I vote you go for 8 for the reasons mentioned. Additionally, you'll
gain valuable insight you share with us :)

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> Go with v8. Let's face it, if there's bugs in v7.1(3), you'll likely to hear
> "it's fixed in v8. ;)
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Billie Brown III" <trip.brown at duke.edu>
> To: "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:12:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Is anyone using Unity Connection 8.0.1?
>
> Capacity is the big driver.  We will ultimately need about 25,000
> subscribers.  Unity connection Release 8.0 gives 20,000 subscribers and 250
> ports per system.  We plan to have two clusters networked.  We would need
> three clusters if we went 7.x.
>
> Also, integrated messaging does not reduce total ports and subscribers like
> it does in the 7.x releases.  And non-IMAP Idle clients do not reduce
> subscribers.  In Release 8.0, a port is a port.  It matters not if the
> subscriber is integratede with Exchange.  This is per Cisco.  I admit that I
> too have .0 reservations but it is somewhat compelling.
>
> Thanks,
> -trip
>
>
> On 3/22/10 12:03 PM, "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've never had good luck with .0 releases myself, at least for call
> manager. Normally wait till the .1 release where possible.
>
> What kind of reason did Cisco give for suggesting version 8?
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Billie Brown III <trip.brown at duke.edu>
> wrote:
>> We are in the process of moving 15,000 Unity 4.2.1 subscribers and
>> callhandlers to Unity Connection with the help of Cisco.  We originally
>> decided upon Unity Connection 7.1.3 but Cisco is now recommending that we
>> go
>> ahead with Unity Connection Release 8.0.1.  Is anyone using Release 8.0.1
>> in
>> a large, active/active environment?  Should we go with the brand new
>> release
>> or stay with 7.x?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Trip Brown
>> Duke University
>> Office of Information Technology
>>
>> Durham, NC 27701
>> 919-668-9228
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
>
>
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>



-- 
Cheers,

Tanner Ezell