[cisco-voip] Is anyone using Unity Connection 8.0.1?

[Ed Leatherman]

To further de-rail this thread.. Are they going to allow NIC teaming
in uccx 8 also? :)

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Saskin <msaskin at gmail.com> wrote:
> linux-based and perhaps more importantly, provides for high availability
> over the WAN.
> Matthew Saskin
> msaskin at gmail.com
> 203-253-9571
>
> July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
> Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
> http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:
>>
>> UCCX 8 is now Linux based, correct?
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Matthew Saskin wrote:
>>
>> fwiw, I've got a large financial as a customer that is making a move
>> (initially) to 8.0 for most production users with the environment then
>> migrating to later versions end of year.  This is a necessity to get past
>> some alternate platform EOS issues, but serves as a bit of an indicator that
>> the general level of acceptance of .0 platforms has increased.  I've got a
>> number of customers lined up to move to CUCM 8.0 and UCCX 8.0 once it's
>> orderable as well.
>> Matthew Saskin
>> msaskin at gmail.com
>> 203-253-9571
>>
>> July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
>> Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
>> http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Tanner Ezell <tanner.ezell at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think Cisco's level of QA has improved over the last couple years in
>>> regards to releases. It seems like there are less and less problems.
>>>
>>> I vote you go for 8 for the reasons mentioned. Additionally, you'll
>>> gain valuable insight you share with us :)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Go with v8. Let's face it, if there's bugs in v7.1(3), you'll likely to
>>> > hear
>>> > "it's fixed in v8. ;)
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>>> > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>>> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>>> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> > Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>>> >                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: "Billie Brown III" <trip.brown at duke.edu>
>>> > To: "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
>>> > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:12:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>>> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Is anyone using Unity Connection 8.0.1?
>>> >
>>> > Capacity is the big driver.  We will ultimately need about 25,000
>>> > subscribers.  Unity connection Release 8.0 gives 20,000 subscribers and
>>> > 250
>>> > ports per system.  We plan to have two clusters networked.  We would
>>> > need
>>> > three clusters if we went 7.x.
>>> >
>>> > Also, integrated messaging does not reduce total ports and subscribers
>>> > like
>>> > it does in the 7.x releases.  And non-IMAP Idle clients do not reduce
>>> > subscribers.  In Release 8.0, a port is a port.  It matters not if the
>>> > subscriber is integratede with Exchange.  This is per Cisco.  I admit
>>> > that I
>>> > too have .0 reservations but it is somewhat compelling.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > -trip
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 3/22/10 12:03 PM, "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I've never had good luck with .0 releases myself, at least for call
>>> > manager. Normally wait till the .1 release where possible.
>>> >
>>> > What kind of reason did Cisco give for suggesting version 8?
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Billie Brown III
>>> > <trip.brown at duke.edu>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> We are in the process of moving 15,000 Unity 4.2.1 subscribers and
>>> >> callhandlers to Unity Connection with the help of Cisco.  We
>>> >> originally
>>> >> decided upon Unity Connection 7.1.3 but Cisco is now recommending that
>>> >> we
>>> >> go
>>> >> ahead with Unity Connection Release 8.0.1.  Is anyone using Release
>>> >> 8.0.1
>>> >> in
>>> >> a large, active/active environment?  Should we go with the brand new
>>> >> release
>>> >> or stay with 7.x?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Trip Brown
>>> >> Duke University
>>> >> Office of Information Technology
>>> >>
>>> >> Durham, NC 27701
>>> >> 919-668-9228
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Ed Leatherman
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
>>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Tanner Ezell
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>



-- 
Ed Leatherman