[cisco-voip] Survivability for CVP VXML Standalone

[redsnapper]

Correction:
service on pots dial peer is "CVPMedia" not "survive".

dial-peer voice 3002 pots
translation-profile incoming OUT
service CVPMedia
destination-pattern 300.
incoming called-number 300.
port 0/3/0:15

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "redsnapper" <redsnapper at gmail.com>
To: "Cisco Voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 10:33 AM
Subject: Survivability for CVP VXML Standalone


> Hi,
>
> We're planning using a VXML script for incoming PSTN calls, to play an 
> announcement and make a transfer to a specific IP Phone in a branch. But, 
> when the WAN link is down, calls are dropped with the default system error 
> message. (critical_error.wav) We need to add survivability to this call 
> flow, ie. if the vxml server is not reachable, it should bypass the script 
> and directly forward to call to the IP phone specified.
>
> CVP config guide says the following:
>
> "On a Unified CVP Standalone call flow model, no special survivability 
> dial-peer needs to be created. Survivability will automatically be invoked 
> by the Unified CVP Standalone script if the "survive" service exists."
>
> My configuration is:
>
> application
>  service CVPMedia flash:CVPSelfService.tcl
>  param CVPSelfService-app IVR_Branch
>  paramspace english language en
>  paramspace english index 0
>  param CVPSelfService-port 7000
>  param CVPPrimaryVXMLServer 10.10.10.10
>  paramspace english location flash:
>  paramspace english prefix en
> ...
> ...
> application
> service survive flash:survivability.tcl
> param open-hours-agent0 1200
> param open-hours-time0 1234567:0800-20:00
> ...
> ...
> dial-peer voice 3002 pots
> translation-profile incoming OUT
> service survive
> destination-pattern 300.
> incoming called-number 300.
> port 0/3/0:15
> !
> ...
> ...
>
>
> But, survivability script doesn't seem to invoke when a call is placed 
> when WAN link is down. So, again the system error message is played and 
> the call is dropped.
>
> Does anyone have an experience with survivability in a similar scenario?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Baris.
>
>
>
>
>