[cisco-voip] HW Based Conferencing Bridge with 2xPVDM2-64

[Syed Khalid Ali]

yes I tried the DSP calculator and for 16 conferencing session, a PVDM64 and
PVDM32 is required.

But I am confused, the same DSPs can be used for both Voice Termination and
Conferencing.

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>wrote:

> Syed,
>
> Have you tried the online DSP calculator at:
> http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/DSP/dsp-calc.pl
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Syed Khalid Ali
> <syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Group:
> > I need some suggestion.
> > Currently we are running CCM 4.2. We have around 30+ site with 5 to 10
> > phones. To save bandwidth and limitation, regions and location have been
> > implemented. G.729 is used for inter-site calls and G.711 for intra-site
> > calls. Currently the voice gateway is placed at head office with two E1s
> and
> > 12 FXOs. The issue is  conferencing with inter-site calls due to G.729.
> > There are 2 PVDM64 installed. 60 are consumed by E1s and 12 by FXOs total
> of
> > 72. I still have (128-72) 76 channels. Is the rest of channels can be
> used
> > for hardware based conferencing. And how many session will be available.
> > Can any one provide a good resource for doing this math?
> > Also since we don't have voice mail. I guess there is no need for
> > transcoding.
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Syed Khalid Ali
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
>



-- 
Thanks,
Syed Khalid Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100513/f5d54960/attachment.html>