[cisco-voip] 1 Unity Connection with 2 CM clusters

lelio at uoguelph.ca lelio at uoguelph.ca
Sun May 30 23:58:13 EDT 2010


Basically, yes.  The MWIs should go out based on the phone system the  
MWI config is set to use.

…
Don't look at me, my iPod made that spilling mistake.

On 2010-05-30, at 10:26 PM, Sandy Lee <Sandy.Lee at dti.ulaval.ca> wrote:

> Ok, just to make sure I understand it correctly. When you say a dual  
> integration, you mean create a new phone system in CUC for the CUCM  
> 7 cluster and that’s it ? Because that’s what I did first, but  
> MWI stopped working for my CUCM 4.1 cluster users.
>
>
>
> What I forgot to say, is that we already have a dual integration for  
> our legacy pbx, which is achieved with TIMGs, but that shouldn’t aff 
> ect anything right ? So CUC will now have 3 phone systems to manage.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards.
>
> Sandy
>
> From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent73 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:15 PM
> To: Sandy Lee
> Cc: Ryan Ratliff; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 1 Unity Connection with 2 CM clusters
>
>
>
> I would seriously consider just doing the dual integration and make  
> sure your bulk assigning the users to the new system in CUC as you  
> migrate them over to the new cluster. I just did this for a client  
> about 3 month ago and it want flawlessly.
>
>
>
> My $0.02
>
> Ted
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Sandy Lee <Sandy.Lee at dti.ulaval.ca>  
> wrote:
>
> I have an ICT between the 2 clusters, but it’s not a QSIG one. I wil 
> l try it with this protocol on.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Sandy.
>
>
>
> From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 11:12 AM
> To: Sandy Lee
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 1 Unity Connection with 2 CM clusters
>
>
>
> You can either use a dual integration (if UC can do this) or set up  
> a qsig tunneled ICT between the two CUCM clusters.  Have a route  
> pattern pointing to that trunk for the numbers that exist on the  
> other cluster and MWIs will be passed between.
>
>
>
> -Ryan
>
>
>
> On May 28, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Sandy Lee wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We’re migrating from CUCM 4.1(3) to UCM 7.1(3) with a new server mig 
> ration approach. We have a Unity Connection 7.1(3) that is already S 
> CCP integrated with the CUCM 4.1(3).
>
>
>
> My question is how do I deal with my 4.1(3) cluster for the MWIs to  
> continue working? In the lab, I configured the SIP integration for  
> the UCM 7.1(3) and it worked just fine, but MWIs stopped working for  
> the 4.1(3) guys.
>
>
>
> In the doc, it says that I need to do a translation pattern, but  
> there’s no example. Did anyone of you went through this and could gi 
> ve me an example?
>
>
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards.
>
>
>
> Sandy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100530/69037fed/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list