[cisco-voip] Dry Closure Phones

David Zhars dzhars at gmail.com
Tue Nov 23 15:23:58 EST 2010


Yes apparently in the Dispatch center, the phones and radio traffic is
recorded.  Apparently (that word again) the PC needs a "dry closure
connection" so the user won't hear both phone and radio at the same time.
This may not be doable with what I am seeing, although the TAM stuff might
be a possibility.  I know the older analog phones definitely had this dry
closure stuff.  I will keep exploring!  Thanks everyone for the feedback.

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> Yes, it looks like it has the more common telco style stipped end and screw
> type connectors. That's cool.
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Eric Butcher" <Eric.Butcher at cdw.com>
> *To: *"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> *Cc: *"David Zhars" <dzhars at gmail.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:06:23 PM
> *Subject: *RE: [cisco-voip] Dry Closure Phones
>
>
>  Great!  I didn’t know they came out with a new one!  The original had 66
> style punchdowns for the wires.  This one looks to use more convenient
> methods.  Looks like you still have to make your own power wire though J
>
>
>
> * *
>
> *Eric Butcher*
>
> *Cisco Unified Communications Engineer**
> **CDW* Professional Services
>
> 11711 N Meridian, Ste 225
>
> Carmel, IN  46032
> ( 317.569.4282 - IP Phone
> ( 765.744.1458 - Mobile
> * eric.butcher at cdw.com
>
> http://www.cdw.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 23, 2010 1:58 PM
> *To:* Eric Butcher
> *Cc:* David Zhars; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Dry Closure Phones
>
>
>
> ...and it looks like the TAM-B has been updated to the TAMB2!
>
> http://www.bogen.com/products/telephonepaging/
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Eric Butcher" <Eric.Butcher at cdw.com>
> *To: *"David Zhars" <dzhars at gmail.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 23, 2010 1:42:18 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Dry Closure Phones
>
>
>  With contact closure, you use a pair of wires to create a loop to signal
> a channel open, and a separate pair of wires to carry the audio (traditional
> tip and ring pair).  You cannot do this without an adaptor.  The best way I
> have found is to use a bogen tam-b or a pagepal, connected to an FXO port.
>
>
>
> * *
>
> *Eric Butcher*
>
> *Cisco Unified Communications Engineer**
> **CDW* Professional Services
>
> 11711 N Meridian, Ste 225
>
> Carmel, IN  46032
> ( 317.569.4282 - IP Phone
> ( 765.744.1458 - Mobile
> * eric.butcher at cdw.com
>
> http://www.cdw.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *David Zhars
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 23, 2010 1:11 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Dry Closure Phones
>
>
>
> An app we are installing at our Police Dept requires the phones to have a
> "dry closure" contact or something like that.
> If I google this, I see a Dry Closure thing for 2600/3600 series, so I am
> researching that.
> Do any phones supported by CCM 8 support dry closure?  Ultimately, I want
> the phones to work with SRST, so I probably don't want to stray too far from
> the Cisco wagon...
>
> Appreciate any insight.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101123/1fb2cf6c/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list