[cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Tue Nov 30 18:04:03 EST 2010
oh. darn. :(
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
From: "Mike Lydick" <mike.lydick at gmail.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:02:56 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration
If you are dedicating ports to these call functions, it might be best to stick with sccp. I am not sure that your going to be able to set multiple trunks to the same unity server.
Best Regards,
Mike Lydick
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca > wrote:
Just some further information and questions...
we have three hunt groups so that we can ensure that calls are processed accordingly, a group reserved for auto-attendant, a group reserved for voicemail access and a group reserved for call processing.
the hunt pilots for each, progressively use the groups, so autoattendant uses all three groups, voice mail uses the voice mail and call processing groups, and call processing only uses the call processing group.
I'm thinking I can simulate this with three SIP trunks and the appropriate number of ports in each SIP trunk group on Unity connection.
On CallManager, I would use route lists to send calls to the group of ports over the sip trunks.
The integration guide refers to the issue of having to use MTPs for older SCCP phones.
Any comments would be most welcome.
Lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" < lelio at uoguelph.ca >
To: "voyp list" < cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:36:27 PM
Subject: SIP trunk vs. SCCP ports for CUCM v7 and UCxN v7 integration
I'm working on the migration from CUCM v4.1(3) to v7.1(x).
I think it would be much simpler if I am able to create a SIP trunk from CallManager v7 to Connection.
Has anyone seen any huge differences between an SCCP and a SIP integration? Do things generally continue to work the same?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101130/588a3cff/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list