[cisco-voip] CUCM 7.1.5 to 7.1(5)SU1- Device Defaults?

Fri Oct 8 15:20:05 EDT 2010

If you have no phones register on PUB (TFTP), after you restart the PUB
after the upgrade completes to all servers in cluster, you can configure the
device defaults with the firmwares you have and then restart the SUB, I
always do that if I don't need to upgrade the firmwares and it works. 

Best Regards,

       Ahmed Maher
Networking Team Leader               CONNECT  Professional Services
          CCIE #23844                           Bldg. 1A Maadi Star Towers,
Cornish El Maadi,
             Cairo, Egypt
                                                             Phone:  (+202)
25 27 09 30          Ext.: 113
                                                             Fax:
(+202) 25 26 54 85
                                                             Mobile: (+2016)
665 1150
            			             Email:
ahmed.maher at connectps.com
                                                             Website:
www.connectps.com

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michael Dury
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:12 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.1.5 to 7.1(5)SU1- Device Defaults?

I found the release notes, thanks. The device defaults have not changed
from the default 7.1.5 release

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 12:00 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 84, Issue 8

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. caller id question (Leslie Meade)
   2. Re: no valid upgrade option (Ted Nugent)
   3. CUPS without AD integration (Ted Nugent)
   4. Re: CUPS without AD integration (Matt Slaga (US))
   5. Re: FW:  Analog Lines and Caller ID (Norton, Mike)
   6. LDAP Authentication Issues (O'Brien, Neil)
   7. Re: LDAP Authentication Issues (Ryan Ratliff)
   8. Re: LDAP Authentication Issues (O'Brien, Neil)
   9. Re: CUPS without AD integration (Ted Nugent)
  10. SIP Load 9.0(3) on 7942/62 registered to CallManager	8.0(3)
      (Jason Aarons (US))
  11. Re: CUPS without AD integration (Matt Slaga (US))
  12. IP Communicator Version? (Scott Voll)
  13. Re: CUPS without AD integration (Ted Nugent)
  14. Re: CUPS without AD integration (Ted Nugent)
  15. SCCP ports on 3845 (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  16. Re: SCCP ports on 3845 (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  17. Re: SCCP ports on 3845 (Matthew Loraditch)
  18. Re: SCCP ports on 3845 (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  19. Re: VG224 IOS Update (Charles Goldsmith)
  20. Re: VG224 IOS Update (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  21. Re: VG224 IOS Update (Eric Isakson)
  22. Re: caller id question (sashank)
  23. Call Park Issue (O'Brien, Neil)
  24. CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM (VoIP Guy)
  25. Re: Call Park Issue (O'Brien, Neil)
  26. Cisco Mobile 8 and IPAD (Ahmed Maher)
  27. CUE as a simple IVR (Dew Swen)
  28. Re: CUE as a simple IVR (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  29. Re: CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  30. Re: CUE as a simple IVR (sashank)
  31. Re: CUE as a simple IVR (Dew Swen)
  32. Re: CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM (VoIP Guy)
  33. Re: CUE as a simple IVR (Nowacki Marcin)
  34. Re: CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM (Matthew Loraditch)
  35. Re: CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  36. Re: CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM (VoIP Guy)
  37. SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and CallManager MGCP
      config downloads (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  38. Re: SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and CallManager MGCP
      config downloads (Matthew Loraditch)
  39. Re: SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and CallManager MGCP
      config downloads (VoIP Guy)
  40. Re: SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and CallManager MGCP
      config downloads (Jason Aarons (US))
  41. reminder necessary: will a PRI port register to callmanager
      if unplugged? (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  42. Re: SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and CallManager MGCP
      config downloads (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  43. Re: reminder necessary: will a PRI port register to
      callmanager if unplugged? (Matthew Loraditch)
  44. Re: reminder necessary: will a PRI port register to
      callmanager if unplugged? (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  45. vg224 with sccp vs MGCP? (Countryman, Edward)
  46. Re: vg224 with sccp vs MGCP? (Lelio Fulgenzi)
  47. Re: vg224 with sccp vs MGCP? (Jason Aarons (US))
  48. IP Communicator Release Notes (Jason Aarons (US))

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:00:55 -0700
From: "Leslie Meade" <lmeade at signal.ca>
To: "Cisco VOIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] caller id question
Message-ID:
	<65BE43A9DA05CD44A3A72B458A7C0C5917E81F at exch-mg.MGVFS.McLeanNet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I am having a brain fart...

How can I make a huntpilot number be the caller ID for the hunt list...

The call is sent to the callmanager via a call handler in Unity, but I
would like it to be displayed on the phone as the pilot number and not
the external caller id.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/68a30
f38/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:18:22 -0400
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] no valid upgrade option
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTi=0=kfDPhqZFYS0prGAg6Lv2khNjeki5Acvyabu at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Make sure it's the restricted version

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
wrote:

> old version is 7.1.3es26.32900-26 --> moving to 7.1.5.32018.1 of UC
>
> Scott
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Dana Tong
<Dana.Tong at ivision.com.au>wrote:
>
>> What is the exact version you are upgrading to and from?
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Dana
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of
*John.VanLaecke at ghd.com
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:27 AM
>> *To:* Scott Voll
>> *Cc:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] no valid upgrade option
>>
>>
>>
>> Make sure the file name is correct,
>>
>> UCSInstall_UCOS*.iso
>>
>>
>> This is what call manager is looking for to see the upgrade.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> *
>> John Van Laecke
>> Network Administrator **
>> **
>> GHD**   **Accomplish More Together*
>> T: 61 7 3316 4456 | M:0427 015 232 | V: 414456 | E:
>> John.vanlaecke at ghd.com
>> Level 2, 201 Charlotte Street QLD AUSTRALIA |
www.ghd.com.au<http://www.ghd.com.au/_>
>>
>> Water <http://www.ghd.com/sectors/water/> | Energy &
Resources<http://www.ghd.com/global/sectors/energy--resources/>|
>> Environment <http://www.ghd.com/sectors/environment/> | Property &
>> Buildings <http://www.ghd.com/global/sectors/property--buildings/> |
>> Transportation <http://www.ghd.com/global/sectors/transportation/>
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email
>>
>> From:
>>
>> Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
>>
>> To:
>>
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>
>> Date:
>>
>> 07/10/2010 08:15 AM
>>
>> Subject:
>>
>> [cisco-voip] no valid upgrade option
>>
>> Sent by:
>>
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I got a version of UC from TAC.  I'm trying to install it but I keep
>> getting the No valid upgrade options.  I have SFTP and DVD without
success.
>>  Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _____________________
>> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>> _____________________
>> This email and all attachments are confidential. For further
important
>> information about emails sent to or from GHD or if you have received
this
>> email in error, please refer to
http://www.ghd.com/emaildisclaimer.html .
>> _____________________
>> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.
>>
>>
______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>>
______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>>
______________________________________________________________________
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/8f4e1
02f/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:22:41 -0400
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
To: Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTinmKPetuBdZE1VN_7HUyKMieGC46G8e1BELz4qn at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I think i know the answer but I'm going to asking anyway... Is there
anyway
to add contact in CUPC if your CUPS server is not integrated with AD?
Ideally this client would like CUPS integrated with CUCM LDAP instead
since
they don't want any ties into their corporate infrastructure. Thoughts?
TIA Ted
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/1c933
94c/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:27:59 -0400
From: "Matt Slaga (US)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
To: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>, Cisco VoIPoE List
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
Message-ID:

<5FE225375F6E3F4493474B90BC1B94EFC33F13B7D5 at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.loca
l>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Yes, you can add contacts but you must do it through the CUPS user
pages.

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ted Nugent
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:23 PM
To: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration

I think i know the answer but I'm going to asking anyway... Is there
anyway to add contact in CUPC if your CUPS server is not integrated with
AD? Ideally this client would like CUPS integrated with CUCM LDAP
instead since they don't want any ties into their corporate
infrastructure. Thoughts?
TIA Ted

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/8bba9
296/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:09:59 -0600
From: "Norton, Mike" <mikenorton at pwsd76.ab.ca>
To: Jeff Ruttman <ruttmanj at carewisc.org>, Cisco VOIP
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FW:  Analog Lines and Caller ID
Message-ID:

<096D50507635B645A061351B1308C90B084D843099 at pwsdexchange03.pwsb33.ab.ca>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

You didn't say what versions you're running. IIRC, caller ID on MGCP FXO
requires IOS 15 on the gateway and CUCM 8 on the cluster.

--
Mike Norton
I.T. Support
Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
Helpdesk: 780-831-3080
Direct: 780-831-3076

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Ruttman
Sent: October-06-10 7:12 AM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] FW: Analog Lines and Caller ID

Should have added that on incoming calls the phone displays "from
unknown number."

________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Ruttman
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:25 AM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] Analog Lines and Caller ID
Greetings,

If a site had a range of DIDs ported to a few analog phones lines
connected to a voice gateway with FXO/FXS and an MGCP config, would you
expect to be able to get caller ID on inbound calls?  If so, and it's
not happening, what might my config be missing?  Or is it more likely
that I need to contact the telco to get caller ID delivered?

Or will caller ID just not work with such a setup?

Thanks
jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/e5d5c
86e/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:56:37 +0100
From: "O'Brien, Neil" <nobrien at datapac.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication Issues
Message-ID:
	<CD11FA7F93164440983D02664508F0160551EF13 at bizet.datapac.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Guys,

I have a user who's Active Directory account is continuously being
locked out by our CCM Publisher.  We user LDAP authentication but we're
not quite sure what device or where the authentication attempts are
coming from.

What trace would I need to run on Call Manager in order to see the
authentication attempts??

Thanks in advance,

Neil

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/3b1b3
b6d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:10:44 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "O'Brien, Neil" <nobrien at datapac.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication Issues
Message-ID: <9FF34B19-3DE3-47FB-9CED-ABD497063055 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

If it's coming from a web app then it'll be in the tomcat
localhost_access logs.
Other places it can come from are CTI via a jtapi or TSP.

-Ryan

On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:56 PM, O'Brien, Neil wrote:

Hi Guys,

I have a user who?s Active Directory account is continuously being
locked out by our CCM Publisher.  We user LDAP authentication but we?re
not quite sure what device or where the authentication attempts are
coming from.

What trace would I need to run on Call Manager in order to see the
authentication attempts??

Thanks in advance,
Neil

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/9e027
b1d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 20:41:19 +0100
From: "O'Brien, Neil" <nobrien at datapac.com>
To: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication Issues
Message-ID:
	<CD11FA7F93164440983D02664508F0160551EF14 at bizet.datapac.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Exactly what I was looking for.

Thanks Ryan.

From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com] 
Sent: 07 October 2010 20:11
To: O'Brien, Neil
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication Issues

If it's coming from a web app then it'll be in the tomcat
localhost_access logs.

Other places it can come from are CTI via a jtapi or TSP.

-Ryan

On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:56 PM, O'Brien, Neil wrote:

Hi Guys,

I have a user who's Active Directory account is continuously being
locked out by our CCM Publisher.  We user LDAP authentication but we're
not quite sure what device or where the authentication attempts are
coming from.

What trace would I need to run on Call Manager in order to see the
authentication attempts??

Thanks in advance,

Neil

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/6127c
824/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:52:39 -0400
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
To: "Matt Slaga (US)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTimRy6WCLGukRPLTiBPtY1LzWexNGt333071PWsR at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Thanks Matt, I'll let them know that is a workaround. Do you know if its
possible do an integration with LDAP with CUPS and still have CM running
local LDAP? They would obviously need to authenticate with CM password
in
CUPC but the contacts profile could query AD. I apologize if that is a
stupid question my CUPS experience is lacking a bit.

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Matt Slaga (US)
<Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>wrote:

> Yes, you can add contacts but you must do it through the CUPS user
pages.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ted Nugent
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:23 PM
> *To:* Cisco VoIPoE List
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
>
>
>
> I think i know the answer but I'm going to asking anyway... Is there
anyway
> to add contact in CUPC if your CUPS server is not integrated with AD?
> Ideally this client would like CUPS integrated with CUCM LDAP instead
since
> they don't want any ties into their corporate infrastructure.
Thoughts?
>
> TIA Ted
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [image:
0ede5e1b-f.gif]<http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=
204>
>
> * Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/c5432
dda/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:52:39 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
To: "cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP Load 9.0(3) on 7942/62 registered to
	CallManager	8.0(3)
Message-ID:

<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0C8107BC58 at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.loca
l>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

1.       I recall that under Device > Phone that SIP loads on 7942/62
will show as unregistered with the ip address next to them

2.       And that RTMT 8.5won't have an accurate count of registered SIP
7942/62 phones.

Correct me if I'm wrong -jason

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/d746c
22e/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:17:23 -0400
From: "Matt Slaga (US)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
To: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
Message-ID:

<5FE225375F6E3F4493474B90BC1B94EFC33F13B7FE at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.loca
l>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

No, it is not possible.  CUPS doesn't have a separate LDAP than UCM,
CUPS uses whatever UCM is configured to use, except for the LDAP search.
That can reach to a separate LDAP (although not sure why you would want
to), but it still doesn't fix adding contacts to the list.

From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent73 at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 3:53 PM
To: Matt Slaga (US)
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration

Thanks Matt, I'll let them know that is a workaround. Do you know if its
possible do an integration with LDAP with CUPS and still have CM running
local LDAP? They would obviously need to authenticate with CM password
in CUPC but the contacts profile could query AD. I apologize if that is
a stupid question my CUPS experience is lacking a bit.

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Matt Slaga (US)
<Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com<mailto:Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>> wrote:
Yes, you can add contacts but you must do it through the CUPS user
pages.

From:
cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether
.net>
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puc
k.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Ted Nugent
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:23 PM
To: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration

I think i know the answer but I'm going to asking anyway... Is there
anyway to add contact in CUPC if your CUPS server is not integrated with
AD? Ideally this client would like CUPS integrated with CUCM LDAP
instead since they don't want any ties into their corporate
infrastructure. Thoughts?
TIA Ted

________________________________
<http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
<http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>
 <http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/68aa0
5ac/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:40:35 -0700
From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Communicator Version?
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTinW4Mto-2wyvrzOFUnnf3Cu9HSATQesLtHNMV_2 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I'm running CM 7.1.5bsu2.  We also have a large Telecommuting base
(>250).
 Is there a way for me to know what versions of IP Communicator everyone
is
using?

TIA

Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/d37db
4d3/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:41:35 -0400
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
To: "Matt Slaga (US)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTinezkigoikq_mHvBm+dFU6gwceAft2ERKh1O+th at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Thats the grey area for me.

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Matt Slaga (US)
<Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>wrote:

> No, it is not possible.  CUPS doesn?t have a separate LDAP than UCM,
CUPS
> uses whatever UCM is configured to use, except for the LDAP search.
That
> can reach to a separate LDAP (although not sure why you would want
to), but
> it still doesn?t fix adding contacts to the list.
>
>
>
>  Good enough. Thanks for the guidance
>
>
>
> *From:* Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent73 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 3:53 PM
> *To:* Matt Slaga (US)
> *Cc:* Cisco VoIPoE List
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
>
>
>
> Thanks Matt, I'll let them know that is a workaround. Do you know if
its
> possible do an integration with LDAP with CUPS and still have CM
running
> local LDAP? They would obviously need to authenticate with CM password
in
> CUPC but the contacts profile could query AD. I apologize if that is a
> stupid question my CUPS experience is lacking a bit.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Matt Slaga (US)
<Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yes, you can add contacts but you must do it through the CUPS user
pages.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ted Nugent
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:23 PM
> *To:* Cisco VoIPoE List
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
>
>
>
> I think i know the answer but I'm going to asking anyway... Is there
anyway
> to add contact in CUPC if your CUPS server is not integrated with AD?
> Ideally this client would like CUPS integrated with CUCM LDAP instead
since
> they don't want any ties into their corporate infrastructure.
Thoughts?
>
> TIA Ted
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> <http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>
>
> *Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
> <http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>*
>
>   <http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [image:
0ede5e1b-f.gif]<http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=
204>
>
> * Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/2a0d9
e81/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:45:09 -0400
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
To: "Matt Slaga (US)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTikxqVxn5rE-Mft2u0-OsWgzo+t9Bp-uF8Nvykw9 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Sorry ignore my last post... typed that to the wrong thread. Thanks for
the
info Matt!

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thats the grey area for me.
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Matt Slaga (US)
<Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>wrote:
>
>> No, it is not possible.  CUPS doesn?t have a separate LDAP than UCM,
CUPS
>> uses whatever UCM is configured to use, except for the LDAP search.
That
>> can reach to a separate LDAP (although not sure why you would want
to), but
>> it still doesn?t fix adding contacts to the list.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent73 at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 3:53 PM
>> *To:* Matt Slaga (US)
>> *Cc:* Cisco VoIPoE List
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Matt, I'll let them know that is a workaround. Do you know if
its
>> possible do an integration with LDAP with CUPS and still have CM
running
>> local LDAP? They would obviously need to authenticate with CM
password in
>> CUPC but the contacts profile could query AD. I apologize if that is
a
>> stupid question my CUPS experience is lacking a bit.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Matt Slaga (US)
<Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, you can add contacts but you must do it through the CUPS user
pages.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ted Nugent
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:23 PM
>> *To:* Cisco VoIPoE List
>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CUPS without AD integration
>>
>>
>>
>> I think i know the answer but I'm going to asking anyway... Is there
>> anyway to add contact in CUPC if your CUPS server is not integrated
with AD?
>> Ideally this client would like CUPS integrated with CUCM LDAP instead
since
>> they don't want any ties into their corporate infrastructure.
Thoughts?
>>
>> TIA Ted
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>  <http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>
>>
>> *Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain
>> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated
>> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you
>> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and
>> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly
>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in
>> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
deleting
>> it from your computer. Thank you.
>> <http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>*
>>
>>   <http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=204>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> [image:
0ede5e1b-f.gif]<http://www.dimensiondata.com/_layouts/forms.aspx?FormID=
204>
>>
>> * Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain
>> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated
>> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you
>> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and
>> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly
>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in
>> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
deleting
>> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/52003
21b/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 15
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:02:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845
Message-ID:

<1778105897.284534.1286485378078.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I've installed two VIC3-2FXS-E/DID cards in a 3845 and I'd like to
configure them as SCCP. Not sure how I can do that on CallManager
4.1(3). 

In v7, when I install a new gateway, I have a choice between MGCP and
SCCP, but on 4.1(3) I only have MGCP as an option. 

Any suggestions? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/4accd
bc8/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 16
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845
Message-ID:

<1041012700.284631.1286485523521.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

ok, I just tried configuring it as an MGCP and it doesn't even list the
VIC3-2FXS-E/DID in the drop down....what am I missing here? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
To: "voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 5:02:58 PM 
Subject: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845 

I've installed two VIC3-2FXS-E/DID cards in a 3845 and I'd like to
configure them as SCCP. Not sure how I can do that on CallManager
4.1(3). 

In v7, when I install a new gateway, I have a choice between MGCP and
SCCP, but on 4.1(3) I only have MGCP as an option. 

Any suggestions? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/3c0e6
79f/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 17
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:19:56 -0400
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>,
	"lelio at uoguelph.ca" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845
Message-ID:
	<530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E6207E9E113D0 at hermes.helion.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

A newer version I think vic3s are way newer than 4.1

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [lelio at uoguelph.ca]
Received: 10/7/10 5:06 PM
To: voyp list [cisco-voip at puck.nether.net]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845

ok, I just tried configuring it as an MGCP and it doesn't even list the
VIC3-2FXS-E/DID in the drop down....what am I missing here?

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

________________________________
From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: "voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 5:02:58 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845

I've installed two VIC3-2FXS-E/DID cards in a 3845 and I'd like to
configure them as SCCP. Not sure how I can do that on CallManager
4.1(3).

In v7, when I install a new gateway, I have a choice between MGCP and
SCCP, but on 4.1(3) I only have MGCP as an option.

Any suggestions?

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/1f7a8
404/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 18
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:29:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845
Message-ID:

<194549214.285481.1286486976912.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

please don't tell me my only option is H323. yuck. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, lelio at uoguelph.ca 
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 5:19:56 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845 

A newer version I think vic3s are way newer than 4.1 

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [lelio at uoguelph.ca] 
Received: 10/7/10 5:06 PM 
To: voyp list [cisco-voip at puck.nether.net] 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845 

ok, I just tried configuring it as an MGCP and it doesn't even list the
VIC3-2FXS-E/DID in the drop down....what am I missing here? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
To: "voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 5:02:58 PM 
Subject: [cisco-voip] SCCP ports on 3845 

I've installed two VIC3-2FXS-E/DID cards in a 3845 and I'd like to
configure them as SCCP. Not sure how I can do that on CallManager
4.1(3). 

In v7, when I install a new gateway, I have a choice between MGCP and
SCCP, but on 4.1(3) I only have MGCP as an option. 

Any suggestions? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/e9744
f5f/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 19
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:48:59 -0500
From: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 IOS Update
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTikCW=q_dBjbX7z8yH_BZQu+z0CtxpghU+RJu3dv at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I recently upgraded my vg224's, and this works, aside from the change
boot
image command, the command is there, but I could not find a combination
to
get this to work.  I didn't take the time to google it, I knew I had
extra
flash cards to back out the upgrade if needed, so just deleted the old
image
and rebooted.

I have deployed all of my vg224's, so nothing to test with handily, but
I'd
be curious if anyone found a boot system command that would work with
this.

Thanks
Charles

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
wrote:

> a VG224 is the same as any other IOS device as far as I know.
>
> these are the steps i would take:
>
>    - upload IOS image to flash
>    - copy startup to startup.old
>    - change boot image command to point to the new image
>    - wr mem
>    - cross fingers
>    - boot device
>    - wr mem so that any config changes due to version change are saved
>    - compare both startups so you know what changed
>    - test functionality (especially faxing if used)
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Michael Dugan" <mdugan at pacific.edu>
>
> *To: *cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Sent: *Wednesday, October 6, 2010 3:49:06 PM
>
> *Subject: *[cisco-voip] VG224 IOS Update
>
>  Does anyone have a detailed process for updating the IOS on a VG224?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
>
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/b6d64
ac9/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 20
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:54:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 IOS Update
Message-ID:

<577291701.286271.1286488491917.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

this is what i use: 

boot system slot0:vg224-i6s-mz.124-15.T5.bin 

Cisco IOS Software, vg224 Software (vg224-I6S-M), Version 12.4(15)T5 

and by testing, you can test on a deployed unit if you have to. i'm just
suggesting before you deploy on a whack load of these things, see how it
pans out for you. 

lelio 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "Charles Goldsmith" <wokka at justfamily.org> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Cc: "Michael Dugan" <mdugan at pacific.edu>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 5:48:59 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 IOS Update 

I recently upgraded my vg224's, and this works, aside from the change
boot image command, the command is there, but I could not find a
combination to get this to work. I didn't take the time to google it, I
knew I had extra flash cards to back out the upgrade if needed, so just
deleted the old image and rebooted. 

I have deployed all of my vg224's, so nothing to test with handily, but
I'd be curious if anyone found a boot system command that would work
with this. 

Thanks 
Charles 

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca >
wrote: 

a VG224 is the same as any other IOS device as far as I know. 

these are the steps i would take: 

    ? upload IOS image to flash 
    ? copy startup to startup.old 
    ? change boot image command to point to the new image 
    ? wr mem 
    ? cross fingers 
    ? boot device 
    ? wr mem so that any config changes due to version change are saved 
    ? compare both startups so you know what changed 
    ? test functionality (especially faxing if used) 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "Michael Dugan" < mdugan at pacific.edu > 

To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 3:49:06 PM 

Subject: [cisco-voip] VG224 IOS Update 

Does anyone have a detailed process for updating the IOS on a VG224? 

Thanks 
_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 

cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/b5dfc
2f7/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 21
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:52:40 -0600
From: Eric Isakson <eric.isakson at ogdenclinic.com>
To: Charles Goldsmith <wokka at justfamily.org>, Lelio Fulgenzi
	<lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 IOS Update
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I think you need to do boot system slot0:/<PATH TO THE .BIN FILE>

Eric Isakson | Network Engineer | Information Technology | Ogden Clinic
| eric.isakson at ogdenclinic.com | 801.475.3572

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles
Goldsmith
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 3:49 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 IOS Update

I recently upgraded my vg224's, and this works, aside from the change
boot image command, the command is there, but I could not find a
combination to get this to work.  I didn't take the time to google it, I
knew I had extra flash cards to back out the upgrade if needed, so just
deleted the old image and rebooted.

I have deployed all of my vg224's, so nothing to test with handily, but
I'd be curious if anyone found a boot system command that would work
with this.

Thanks
Charles
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
<lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
a VG224 is the same as any other IOS device as far as I know.

these are the steps i would take:

 *   upload IOS image to flash
 *   copy startup to startup.old
 *   change boot image command to point to the new image
 *   wr mem
 *   cross fingers
 *   boot device
 *   wr mem so that any config changes due to version change are saved
 *   compare both startups so you know what changed
 *   test functionality (especially faxing if used)

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

________________________________
From: "Michael Dugan" <mdugan at pacific.edu<mailto:mdugan at pacific.edu>>

To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 3:49:06 PM

Subject: [cisco-voip] VG224 IOS Update
Does anyone have a detailed process for updating the IOS on a VG224?

Thanks

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list

cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

########################################################################
############################
This email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended
solely for the addressee.
Access to this email by anyone else, unless expressly approved by the
sender or an authorized
addressee, is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you believe that you have received this email in error, please
contact the sender, delete this
email, and destroy all copies.
########################################################################
############################
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101007/cd9b3
1b4/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 22
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:05:55 +0530
From: "sashank" <sasanka.pathi at Locuz.com>
To: "'Leslie Meade'" <lmeade at signal.ca>, "'Cisco VOIP'"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] caller id question
Message-ID: <000001cb66cc$35ec47f0$a1c4d7d0$@pathi at locuz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Just wondering how it can be possible. In every scenario we would
require
the number to  be displayed when the user is seeing an incoming call. I
don't think the call handler can block the incoming call information

Warm Regards,

Venkata Sasanka.pathi(-91 950 265 2290)

Consultant | unified communications

Locuz Enterprise Solutions Ltd. (A Subsidiary of 3i-Infotech)

(office:914066115656)

  <mailto:sasanka.pathi at locuz.com> sasanka.pathi at locuz.com

 <http://www.locuz.com> www.locuz.com

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Leslie Meade
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:31 PM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] caller id question

I am having a brain fart.

How can I make a huntpilot number be the caller ID for the hunt list.

The call is sent to the callmanager via a call handler in Unity, but I
would
like it to be displayed on the phone as the pilot number and not the
external caller id.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/07b03
11a/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 23
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:38:45 +0100
From: "O'Brien, Neil" <nobrien at datapac.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Call Park Issue
Message-ID:
	<CD11FA7F93164440983D02664508F0160551EFF2 at bizet.datapac.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Guys, 

I'm running Call manager 6.1.3.3190-1 and I'm having a strange call park
issue. 

When I make an outgoing call from a phone, I can park it no problem.
However when I receive an incoming call, I am unable to park it, the
phone says no call park no available, 

I'm not sure if the gateway needs access to the call park partition but
I added it anyway and still no joy. 

Any ideas?? 

Thanks,

Neil

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/c28a5
8f7/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 24
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:50:38 +0100
From: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTinrft=-wV0FUcKKzWqevoa1-H-e_BJydROwEJpK at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi all,

Does anyone know what the top part number is for CUCM 8 on the UCS
platform... I have the physical components specced up using DCT but
can't
find the top part number for CUCM 8:

  UCS-C210M1-VCD2 Bare Metal UCS C210M1 Svr.,2xE5540 CPU,36GB
RAM,10x146GB
HDD  UC-CAB-9K10A-UK Power Cord, 250VAC 10A BS1363 Plug (13 A fuse), UK
UC-A03-D146GA2 146GB 6Gb SAS 10K RPM SFF HDD/hot plug/drive sled mounted
UC-N01-M302GB1 2GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb DRAMs
UC-N01-M304GB1 4GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb DRAMs
UC-N20-X00002 2.53GHz Xeon E5540 80W CPU/8MB cache/DDR3 1066MHz
UC-N2XX-ABPCI03 Broadcom BCM5709 Quad Gig E card (10/100/1GbE)
UC-R210-ODVDRW DVD-RW Drive for UCS C210 M1 Rack Servers
UC-R2X0-PSU2-650W 650W
power supply unit for UCS C210 M1 Rack Server  UC-R2XX-LBBU2 Battery
Back-up
for 6G based LSI MegaRAID Card  UC-R2XX-PL003 LSI 6G MegaRAID PCIe Card
(RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 60) - 512WC
Regards,

C
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/706f1
832/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 25
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:08:23 +0100
From: "O'Brien, Neil" <nobrien at datapac.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call Park Issue
Message-ID:
	<CD11FA7F93164440983D02664508F0160551F016 at bizet.datapac.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

just an update guys, even though my gateway is in a device pool set to
register with the SUB first, once I created the Call Park extn on the
PUB it appeared to work.  So i'm guessing for whatever reason my gateway
is registering with the PUB and not the SUB??  Anyway, I have call park
extensions on both now so it should be fine.

Thanks,

Neil

From: O'Brien, Neil 
Sent: 08 October 2010 11:32
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Call Park Issue

Hi Guys, 

I'm running Call manager 6.1.3.3190-1 and I'm having a strange call park
issue. 

When I make an outgoing call from a phone, I can park it no problem.
However when I receive an incoming call, I am unable to park it, the
phone says no call park no available, 

I'm not sure if the gateway needs access to the call park partition but
I added it anyway and still no joy. 

Any ideas?? 

Thanks,

Neil

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/27dc1
7c4/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 26
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:03:51 +0200
From: "Ahmed Maher" <ahmed.maher at connectps.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Mobile 8 and IPAD
Message-ID: <00f601cb66d8$7fc2e800$7f48b800$@maher at connectps.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi all,

I configured Cisco Mobile 8 with IPAD and working fine, but I need to
configure the VPN Feature, the Cisco Administration guide isn't
describing
it well, In CUCM Configuration (Dual Mode for IPhone) there is field
called
VPN URL (which URL should be there, any Dummy URL like www.cisco.com  OR
what), also for the ASA VPN Part, Should be IPSEC VPN or easy VPN or SSL
,..

Best Regards,

   Connect Logo copy

       Ahmed Maher

Networking Team Leader               CONNECT  Professional Services

          CCIE #23844                           Bldg. 1A Maadi Star
Towers,
Cornish El Maadi,

specialist_smccie_voice_sm             Cairo, Egypt

                                                             Phone:
(+202)
25 27 09 30          Ext.: 113

                                                             Fax:
(+202) 25 26 54 85

                                                             Mobile:
(+2016)
665 1150

                                                             Email:
<mailto:ahmed.maher at connectps.com> ahmed.maher at connectps.com

                                                             Website:
<http://www.connectps.com/> www.connectps.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/24ac7
beb/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2451 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/24ac7
beb/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 25192 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/24ac7
beb/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1653 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/24ac7
beb/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 26357 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/24ac7
beb/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1772 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/24ac7
beb/attachment-0009.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/24ac7
beb/attachment-0001.bin>

------------------------------

Message: 27
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:22:01 +0300
From: Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com>
To: VoIPgroup <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUE as a simple IVR
Message-ID: <4CAEFED9.40303 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

  Is it possible? Just a simple IVR. No agents or ques.

Regards,

Dew Swen / sent from mobile
CCVP, CCDP, CCNP

------------------------------

Message: 28
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:24:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com>
Cc: VoIPgroup <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUE as a simple IVR
Message-ID: <BA030176-CAE5-4911-953F-762E1D2EE590 at uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=utf-8;	format=flowed;
delsp=yes

I believe their are IVR ports as configurable parts for CUE so I would  
say yes.

?
Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.

On 2010-10-08, at 7:22 AM, Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it possible? Just a simple IVR. No agents or ques.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dew Swen / sent from mobile
> CCVP, CCDP, CCNP
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

------------------------------

Message: 29
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM
Message-ID: <35C1D9AE-B87D-45CB-AAB2-13F4F53CA8E0 at uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed";
	DelSp="yes"

Did you get this list from the price list or the configuration tool?

I use the configuration tool for this sort of stuff which starts with  
the zero dollar top level SKU.

?
Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.

On 2010-10-08, at 6:53 AM, VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know what the top part number is for CUCM 8 on the UCS  
> platform... I have the physical components specced up using DCT but  
> can't find the top part number for CUCM 8:
>
> UCS-C210M1-VCD2	Bare Metal UCS C210M1 Svr.,2xE5540 CPU,36GB RAM,

> 10x146GB HDD
> UC-CAB-9K10A-UK	Power Cord, 250VAC 10A BS1363 Plug (13 A fuse),
UK
> UC-A03-D146GA2	146GB 6Gb SAS 10K RPM SFF HDD/hot plug/drive
sled  
> mounted
> UC-N01-M302GB1	2GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb
DRAMs
> UC-N01-M304GB1	4GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb
DRAMs
> UC-N20-X00002	2.53GHz Xeon E5540 80W CPU/8MB cache/DDR3 1066MHz
> UC-N2XX-ABPCI03	Broadcom BCM5709 Quad Gig E card (10/100/1GbE)
> UC-R210-ODVDRW	DVD-RW Drive for UCS C210 M1 Rack Servers
> UC-R2X0-PSU2-650W	650W power supply unit for UCS C210 M1 Rack
Server
> UC-R2XX-LBBU2	Battery Back-up for 6G based LSI MegaRAID Card
> UC-R2XX-PL003	LSI 6G MegaRAID PCIe Card (RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 60) -  
> 512WC
>
> Regards,
>
> C
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/1a7eb
91d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 30
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:02:21 +0530
From: "sashank" <sasanka.pathi at Locuz.com>
To: "'Lelio Fulgenzi'" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "'Dew Swen'"
	<dew.swen at gmail.com>
Cc: 'VoIPgroup' <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUE as a simple IVR
Message-ID: <000601cb66dc$7a373db0$6ea5b910$@pathi at locuz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="utf-8"

You have auto attendant script by default, you can create a dial-peer (
incase of call manager express) point that to CUE or you can create a
route point and add that route point in CUE.

Warm Regards,
Venkata Sasanka.pathi(-91 950 265 2290)
Consultant | unified communications
Locuz Enterprise Solutions Ltd. (A Subsidiary of 3i-Infotech)
(office:914066115656)
 sasanka.pathi at locuz.com
www.locuz.com

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 4:54 PM
To: Dew Swen
Cc: VoIPgroup
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUE as a simple IVR

I believe their are IVR ports as configurable parts for CUE so I would  
say yes.

?
Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.

On 2010-10-08, at 7:22 AM, Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it possible? Just a simple IVR. No agents or ques.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dew Swen / sent from mobile
> CCVP, CCDP, CCNP
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

------------------------------

Message: 31
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:18:45 +0300
From: Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com>
To: sashank <sasanka.pathi at locuz.com>
Cc: 'VoIPgroup' <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUE as a simple IVR
Message-ID: <4CAF0C25.6050508 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

  Thanx guys,
Thats what i was looking for.

Regards,

Dew Swen / sent from mobile
CCVP, CCDP, CCNP

On 08.10.2010 14:32, sashank wrote:
> You have auto attendant script by default, you can create a dial-peer
( incase of call manager express) point that to CUE or you can create a
route point and add that route point in CUE.
>
> Warm Regards,
> Venkata Sasanka.pathi(-91 950 265 2290)
> Consultant | unified communications
> Locuz Enterprise Solutions Ltd. (A Subsidiary of 3i-Infotech)
> (office:914066115656)
>   sasanka.pathi at locuz.com
> www.locuz.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 4:54 PM
> To: Dew Swen
> Cc: VoIPgroup
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUE as a simple IVR
>
> I believe their are IVR ports as configurable parts for CUE so I would
> say yes.
>
> ?
> Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.
>
> On 2010-10-08, at 7:22 AM, Dew Swen<dew.swen at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Is it possible? Just a simple IVR. No agents or ques.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dew Swen / sent from mobile
>> CCVP, CCDP, CCNP
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>

------------------------------

Message: 32
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:40:05 +0100
From: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTi=M10W22vtVx1Jfdt7wq303sX6bKG2PCoaWOEjD at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Hi Lelio,

I got this from the configuration tool which has the prices included.
Just
didn't include it in the excerpt below.

If you have the top part number which will include the below, that would
be
appreciated.

Cheers,

C

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
wrote:

> Did you get this list from the price list or the configuration tool?
>
> I use the configuration tool for this sort of stuff which starts with
the
> zero dollar top level SKU.
>
> ?
> Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.
>
> On 2010-10-08, at 6:53 AM, VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know what the top part number is for CUCM 8 on the UCS
> platform... I have the physical components specced up using DCT but
can't
> find the top part number for CUCM 8:
>
>   UCS-C210M1-VCD2 Bare Metal UCS C210M1 Svr.,2xE5540 CPU,36GB
RAM,10x146GB
> HDD  UC-CAB-9K10A-UK Power Cord, 250VAC 10A BS1363 Plug (13 A fuse),
UK
> UC-A03-D146GA2 146GB 6Gb SAS 10K RPM SFF HDD/hot plug/drive sled
mounted
> UC-N01-M302GB1 2GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb DRAMs
> UC-N01-M304GB1 4GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb DRAMs
> UC-N20-X00002 2.53GHz Xeon E5540 80W CPU/8MB cache/DDR3 1066MHz
> UC-N2XX-ABPCI03 Broadcom BCM5709 Quad Gig E card (10/100/1GbE)
> UC-R210-ODVDRW DVD-RW Drive for UCS C210 M1 Rack Servers
> UC-R2X0-PSU2-650W 650W power supply unit for UCS C210 M1 Rack Server
> UC-R2XX-LBBU2 Battery Back-up for 6G based LSI MegaRAID Card
> UC-R2XX-PL003 LSI 6G MegaRAID PCIe Card (RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 60) -
512WC
> Regards,
>
> C
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/2673f
c91/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 33
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:19:17 +0200
From: Nowacki Marcin <Marcin_Nowacki at sevenet.pl>
To: Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com>, VoIPgroup
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUE as a simple IVR
Message-ID:

<C7E008A69E52DD40B9CC820E58D4421D8872635ADC at exchange.sevenet.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Yes it is possible, You need to implement aa scripts and configuration.

Marcin

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dew Swen
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 1:22 PM
To: VoIPgroup
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUE as a simple IVR

  Is it possible? Just a simple IVR. No agents or ques.

Regards,

Dew Swen / sent from mobile
CCVP, CCDP, CCNP
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

S?d Rejonowy Gda?sk - P??noc w Gda?sku, VII Wydzia? Gospodarczy
Krajowego Rejestru S?dowego  KRS: 0000308826, NIP: 583-22-02-053 Kapita?
zak?adowy: 588.000,00
Zawarto?? tej wiadomo?ci zawiera informacje zastrze?one, stanowi?ce
tajemnic? firmy SEVENET S.A. Nieuprawnione wykorzystanie tych informacji
do w?asnych cel?w lub ich ujawnianie osobom trzecim jest zabronione. W
przypadku omy?kowego otrzymania tej wiadomo?ci prosimy o jej trwa?e
skasowanie oraz powiadomienie o tym fakcie nadawcy informacji.
This e-mail content contains confidential information, and is the
property of SEVENET S.A. Any illegal use of this information for
personal purposes or any disclosure to other persons or entities is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message please
delete this e-mail and inform the sender about it.

------------------------------

Message: 34
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:51:02 -0400
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
To: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>, Lelio Fulgenzi
	<lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM
Message-ID:
	<530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E6207EA0458B7 at hermes.helion.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Go here and take a look at the ordering guides:
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/sell/technology/ipc/uc_tech_readiness.
html

[cid:image001.jpg at 01CB66C5.EF742D70]
Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593

Visit us at
www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
Support Issue? Email
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
for fast assistance!

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of VoIP Guy
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:40 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM

Hi Lelio,

I got this from the configuration tool which has the prices included.
Just didn't include it in the excerpt below.

If you have the top part number which will include the below, that would
be appreciated.

Cheers,

C
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
<lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
Did you get this list from the price list or the configuration tool?

I use the configuration tool for this sort of stuff which starts with
the zero dollar top level SKU.

...
Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.

On 2010-10-08, at 6:53 AM, VoIP Guy
<ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com<mailto:ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

Does anyone know what the top part number is for CUCM 8 on the UCS
platform... I have the physical components specced up using DCT but
can't find the top part number for CUCM 8:
UCS-C210M1-VCD2

Bare Metal UCS C210M1 Svr.,2xE5540 CPU,36GB RAM,10x146GB HDD

UC-CAB-9K10A-UK

Power Cord, 250VAC 10A BS1363 Plug (13 A fuse), UK

UC-A03-D146GA2

146GB 6Gb SAS 10K RPM SFF HDD/hot plug/drive sled mounted

UC-N01-M302GB1

2GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb DRAMs

UC-N01-M304GB1

4GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb DRAMs

UC-N20-X00002

2.53GHz Xeon E5540 80W CPU/8MB cache/DDR3 1066MHz

UC-N2XX-ABPCI03

Broadcom BCM5709 Quad Gig E card (10/100/1GbE)

UC-R210-ODVDRW

DVD-RW Drive for UCS C210 M1 Rack Servers

UC-R2X0-PSU2-650W

650W power supply unit for UCS C210 M1 Rack Server

UC-R2XX-LBBU2

Battery Back-up for 6G based LSI MegaRAID Card

UC-R2XX-PL003

LSI 6G MegaRAID PCIe Card (RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 60) - 512WC

Regards,

C
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/ff459
99f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 33011 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/ff459
99f/attachment-0001.jpg>

------------------------------

Message: 35
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 09:00:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM
Message-ID:

<405269351.299187.1286542838815.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

sorry, i don't have the top part number. if you look on the data sheet,
it might help though. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "VoIP Guy" <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 8:40:05 AM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM 

Hi Lelio, 

I got this from the configuration tool which has the prices included.
Just didn't include it in the excerpt below. 

If you have the top part number which will include the below, that would
be appreciated. 

Cheers, 

C 

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca >
wrote: 

Did you get this list from the price list or the configuration tool? 

I use the configuration tool for this sort of stuff which starts with
the zero dollar top level SKU. 

? 
Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake. 

On 2010-10-08, at 6:53 AM, VoIP Guy < ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com > wrote: 

Hi all, 

Does anyone know what the top part number is for CUCM 8 on the UCS
platform... I have the physical components specced up using DCT but
can't find the top part number for CUCM 8: 

	UCS-C210M1-VCD2 	Bare Metal UCS C210M1 Svr.,2xE5540
CPU,36GB RAM,10x146GB HDD 
	UC-CAB-9K10A-UK 	Power Cord, 250VAC 10A BS1363 Plug (13 A
fuse), UK 
	UC-A03-D146GA2 	146GB 6Gb SAS 10K RPM SFF HDD/hot plug/drive
sled mounted 
	UC-N01-M302GB1 	2GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb
DRAMs 
	UC-N01-M304GB1 	4GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb
DRAMs 
	UC-N20-X00002 	2.53GHz Xeon E5540 80W CPU/8MB cache/DDR3
1066MHz 
	UC-N2XX-ABPCI03 	Broadcom BCM5709 Quad Gig E card
(10/100/1GbE) 
	UC-R210-ODVDRW 	DVD-RW Drive for UCS C210 M1 Rack Servers 
	UC-R2X0-PSU2-650W 	650W power supply unit for UCS C210 M1
Rack Server 
	UC-R2XX-LBBU2 	Battery Back-up for 6G based LSI MegaRAID Card 
	UC-R2XX-PL003 	LSI 6G MegaRAID PCIe Card (RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10,
60) - 512WC 
Regards, 

C 

_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/d46d9
472/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 36
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:23:41 +0100
From: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>
To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTinL9Lt4N5DG9Y7Lr2GD-5yDjExNyuYQJyARERO8 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Thank you to you both.

I will take a look and hope I find it in there. :) If not, might be
back. :p

C

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Loraditch <
MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

> Go here and take a look at the ordering guides:
>
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/sell/technology/ipc/uc_tech_readiness.
html
>
>
>
> [image: Description: cid:image001.jpg at 01C95158.4441E1B0]
>
> *Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA*
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast
assistance!
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *VoIP Guy
> *Sent:* Friday, October 08, 2010 8:40 AM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8 TOP PART NUMBER FOR UC PLATFORM
>
>
>
> Hi Lelio,
>
> I got this from the configuration tool which has the prices included.
Just
> didn't include it in the excerpt below.
>
> If you have the top part number which will include the below, that
would be
> appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> C
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
wrote:
>
> Did you get this list from the price list or the configuration tool?
>
>
>
> I use the configuration tool for this sort of stuff which starts with
the
> zero dollar top level SKU.
>
>
> ?
>
> Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.
>
>
> On 2010-10-08, at 6:53 AM, VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know what the top part number is for CUCM 8 on the UCS
> platform... I have the physical components specced up using DCT but
can't
> find the top part number for CUCM 8:
>
> UCS-C210M1-VCD2
>
> Bare Metal UCS C210M1 Svr.,2xE5540 CPU,36GB RAM,10x146GB HDD
>
> UC-CAB-9K10A-UK
>
> Power Cord, 250VAC 10A BS1363 Plug (13 A fuse), UK
>
> UC-A03-D146GA2
>
> 146GB 6Gb SAS 10K RPM SFF HDD/hot plug/drive sled mounted
>
> UC-N01-M302GB1
>
> 2GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb DRAMs
>
> UC-N01-M304GB1
>
> 4GB DDR3-1333MHz RDIMM/PC3-10600/dual rank 1Gb DRAMs
>
> UC-N20-X00002
>
> 2.53GHz Xeon E5540 80W CPU/8MB cache/DDR3 1066MHz
>
> UC-N2XX-ABPCI03
>
> Broadcom BCM5709 Quad Gig E card (10/100/1GbE)
>
> UC-R210-ODVDRW
>
> DVD-RW Drive for UCS C210 M1 Rack Servers
>
> UC-R2X0-PSU2-650W
>
> 650W power supply unit for UCS C210 M1 Rack Server
>
> UC-R2XX-LBBU2
>
> Battery Back-up for 6G based LSI MegaRAID Card
>
> UC-R2XX-PL003
>
> LSI 6G MegaRAID PCIe Card (RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 60) - 512WC
>
>
> Regards,
>
> C
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/8db0b
f8e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 33011 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/8db0b
f8e/attachment-0001.jpg>

------------------------------

Message: 37
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 09:57:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
	CallManager MGCP config downloads
Message-ID:

<1638084331.301367.1286546248894.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

So here's my scenario: 

    ? 3845/3945 router with two or more PRIs 
    ? PRIs are in MGCP mode using "ccm-manager config " to download
configs 
    ? router acts as SRST so MGCP gateways go into H323 fall back 

I had tried configuring trunk groups to use with the dial peers so i
wouldn't have to duplicate them for each PRI. This worked until the
second SRST trigger. So the behaviour was this: 

    ? configure trunk group membership on serial interface as instructed
by TAC 
    ? configure dial peers to point to trunk group 
    ? trigger SRST, make calls, calls work 
    ? revert back to normal operation 
    ? router downloads MGCP config from CallManager, effectively wiping
out the trunk group membership on serial interfaces 
    ? trigger SRST, make calls, calls fail because there are no trunk
group members 

How are others handling this scenario, i.e. you are using MGCP with
"ccm-manager config" command and SRST and trunk groups? 

Why wouldn't CCM allow for a trunk group membership command? I even
checked on version 7.1 and there's nothing there. :( 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/551dd
ada/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 38
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:32:57 -0400
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>,
	"lelio at uoguelph.ca" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
	CallManager MGCP config downloads
Message-ID:
	<530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E6207E9E113D2 at hermes.helion.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I don't think you have a choice. The serial port configs are controlled
by ccm in mgcp mode its always going to overwrite anything not from ccm
when it resets.

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [lelio at uoguelph.ca]
Received: 10/8/10 10:10 AM
To: voyp list [cisco-voip at puck.nether.net]
Subject: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
CallManager MGCP config downloads

So here's my scenario:

 *   3845/3945 router with two or more PRIs
 *   PRIs are in MGCP mode using "ccm-manager config" to download
configs
 *   router acts as SRST so MGCP gateways go into H323 fall back

I had tried configuring trunk groups to use with the dial peers so i
wouldn't have to duplicate them for each PRI. This worked until the
second SRST trigger. So the behaviour was this:

 *   configure trunk group membership on serial interface as instructed
by TAC
 *   configure dial peers to point to trunk group
 *   trigger SRST, make calls, calls work
 *   revert back to normal operation
 *   router downloads MGCP config from CallManager, effectively wiping
out the trunk group membership on serial interfaces
 *   trigger SRST, make calls, calls fail because there are no trunk
group members

How are others handling this scenario, i.e. you are using MGCP with
"ccm-manager config" command and SRST and trunk groups?

Why wouldn't CCM allow for a trunk group membership command? I even
checked on version 7.1 and there's nothing there. :(

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/2286d
4c7/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 39
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:48:23 +0100
From: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>
To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
	CallManager MGCP config downloads
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTin+9iUaDrHBXgHmJ8K781cegUEAtB1SPfR8kro_ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

It might just be worth disabling the command ccm-manager config which
means
that your config should not be overwritten.

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Matthew Loraditch <
MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

>  I don't think you have a choice. The serial port configs are
controlled
> by ccm in mgcp mode its always going to overwrite anything not from
ccm when
> it resets.
>
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi [lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> *Received:* 10/8/10 10:10 AM
> *To:* voyp list [cisco-voip at puck.nether.net]
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
> CallManager MGCP config downloads
>
>  So here's my scenario:
>
>    - 3845/3945 router with two or more PRIs
>    - PRIs are in MGCP mode using "ccm-manager config" to download
configs
>    - router acts as SRST so MGCP gateways go into H323 fall back
>
> I had tried configuring trunk groups to use with the dial peers so i
> wouldn't have to duplicate them for each PRI. This worked until the
second
> SRST trigger. So the behaviour was this:
>
>    - configure trunk group membership on serial interface as
instructed by
>    TAC
>    - configure dial peers to point to trunk group
>    - trigger SRST, make calls, calls work
>    - revert back to normal operation
>    - router downloads MGCP config from CallManager, effectively wiping
out
>    the trunk group membership on serial interfaces
>    - trigger SRST, make calls, calls fail because there are no trunk
group
>    members
>
> How are others handling this scenario, i.e. you are using MGCP with
> "ccm-manager config" command and SRST and trunk groups?
>
> Why wouldn't CCM allow for a trunk group membership command? I even
checked
> on version 7.1 and there's nothing there. :(
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/784e0
a21/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 40
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:05:39 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
To: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>, Matthew Loraditch
	<MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
	CallManager MGCP config downloads
Message-ID:

<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0C8107BE63 at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.loca
l>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

However if you disable ccm-manager config you also can't reset port,
etc.  It's a catch 22. I don't recommend it, I once had a bad bug where
ccm-manager config was wiping out fxs interface information....

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of VoIP Guy
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 10:48 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
CallManager MGCP config downloads

It might just be worth disabling the command ccm-manager config which
means that your config should not be overwritten.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Matthew Loraditch
<MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.
com>> wrote:
I don't think you have a choice. The serial port configs are controlled
by ccm in mgcp mode its always going to overwrite anything not from ccm
when it resets.

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown
(www.nitrodesk.com<http://www.nitrodesk.com>)

-----Original Message-----
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>]
Received: 10/8/10 10:10 AM
To: voyp list
[cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>]
Subject: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
CallManager MGCP config downloads
So here's my scenario:

 *   3845/3945 router with two or more PRIs
 *   PRIs are in MGCP mode using "ccm-manager config" to download
configs
 *   router acts as SRST so MGCP gateways go into H323 fall back
I had tried configuring trunk groups to use with the dial peers so i
wouldn't have to duplicate them for each PRI. This worked until the
second SRST trigger. So the behaviour was this:

 *   configure trunk group membership on serial interface as instructed
by TAC
 *   configure dial peers to point to trunk group
 *   trigger SRST, make calls, calls work
 *   revert back to normal operation
 *   router downloads MGCP config from CallManager, effectively wiping
out the trunk group membership on serial interfaces
 *   trigger SRST, make calls, calls fail because there are no trunk
group members
How are others handling this scenario, i.e. you are using MGCP with
"ccm-manager config" command and SRST and trunk groups?

Why wouldn't CCM allow for a trunk group membership command? I even
checked on version 7.1 and there's nothing there. :(

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/8ebe6
411/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 41
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:11:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] reminder necessary: will a PRI port register to
	callmanager if unplugged?
Message-ID:

<759361784.304759.1286550696770.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I'm setting up a router with two PRI ports. will they register to
callmanager if they are not plugged in? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/feae3
35d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 42
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:12:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
	CallManager MGCP config downloads
Message-ID:

<99307137.304791.1286550722196.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I'm thinking that might be the way to go. remove the ccm-manager config
command once i've downloaded the config. If I make any changes on
CallManager, then I re-issue the ccm-manager config command and reapply
the trunk group settings on each serial interface. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "VoIP Guy" <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com> 
To: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, lelio at uoguelph.ca 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 10:48:23 AM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
CallManager MGCP config downloads 

It might just be worth disabling the command ccm-manager config which
means that your config should not be overwritten. 

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Matthew Loraditch <
MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com > wrote: 

I don't think you have a choice. The serial port configs are controlled
by ccm in mgcp mode its always going to overwrite anything not from ccm
when it resets. 

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown ( www.nitrodesk.com ) 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [ lelio at uoguelph.ca ] 
Received: 10/8/10 10:10 AM 
To: voyp list [ cisco-voip at puck.nether.net ] 
Subject: [cisco-voip] SRST and dial peers and trunk groups and
CallManager MGCP config downloads 

So here's my scenario: 

    ? 3845/3945 router with two or more PRIs 
    ? PRIs are in MGCP mode using "ccm-manager config" to download
configs 
    ? router acts as SRST so MGCP gateways go into H323 fall back 
I had tried configuring trunk groups to use with the dial peers so i
wouldn't have to duplicate them for each PRI. This worked until the
second SRST trigger. So the behaviour was this: 

    ? configure trunk group membership on serial interface as instructed
by TAC 
    ? configure dial peers to point to trunk group 
    ? trigger SRST, make calls, calls work 
    ? revert back to normal operation 
    ? router downloads MGCP config from CallManager, effectively wiping
out the trunk group membership on serial interfaces 
    ? trigger SRST, make calls, calls fail because there are no trunk
group members 

How are others handling this scenario, i.e. you are using MGCP with
"ccm-manager config" command and SRST and trunk groups? 

Why wouldn't CCM allow for a trunk group membership command? I even
checked on version 7.1 and there's nothing there. :( 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/da3aa
b16/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 43
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:12:28 -0400
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, voyp list
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] reminder necessary: will a PRI port register
	to callmanager if unplugged?
Message-ID:
	<530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E6207EA0458E3 at hermes.helion.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

No they do not

Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593

Visit us at
www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
Support Issue? Email
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
for fast assistance!

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:12 AM
To: voyp list
Subject: [cisco-voip] reminder necessary: will a PRI port register to
callmanager if unplugged?

I'm setting up a router with two PRI ports. will they register to
callmanager if they are not plugged in?

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/ba2a8
99b/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 44
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:17:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Cc: voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] reminder necessary: will a PRI port register
	to callmanager if unplugged?
Message-ID:

<1890761731.305042.1286551029922.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

k, thanks. 

i might get a T1 crossover going and plug them into each other for the
time being to see them register...clocking won't be nice, but just to
see. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "voyp list"
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 11:12:28 AM 
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] reminder necessary: will a PRI port register
to callmanager if unplugged? 

No they do not 

Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA 
1965 Greenspring Drive 

Timonium, MD 21093 
support at heliontechnologies.com 
(p) (410) 252-8830 
(F) (443) 541-1593 

Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com 
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:12 AM 
To: voyp list 
Subject: [cisco-voip] reminder necessary: will a PRI port register to
callmanager if unplugged? 

I'm setting up a router with two PRI ports. will they register to
callmanager if they are not plugged in? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/60c0f
158/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 45
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:21:34 -0500
From: "Countryman, Edward" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg224 with sccp vs MGCP?
Message-ID:

<898237D7FE163A40A3257E385562F27E059A0402 at AEXMV02.phnet.phroot.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I have a large number of VG224's to configure and deploy.

Any thoughts on pro's/Cons of using SCCP (stcapp) vs. MGCP?  My
application is a large assisted living center and most of the phones
will be resident rooms.   

Are there any licensing implications with one over the other?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/905ac
7fa/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 46
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:25:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Edward Countryman <Edward.Countryman at provena.org>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 with sccp vs MGCP?
Message-ID:

<1654663895.305532.1286551535474.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I am a fan of SCCP on VG224s. I have not had any problems yet. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 

From: "Edward Countryman" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org> 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 11:21:34 AM 
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg224 with sccp vs MGCP? 

I have a large number of VG224?s to configure and deploy. 

Any thoughts on pro?s/Cons of using SCCP (stcapp) vs. MGCP? My
application is a large assisted living center and most of the phones
will be resident rooms. 

Are there any licensing implications with one over the other? 
_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/c6660
a4f/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 47
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:29:11 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
To: "Countryman, Edward" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org>,
	"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 with sccp vs MGCP?
Message-ID:

<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0C8107BE98 at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.loca
l>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

You will likely enjoy SCCP supplementary features like stutter dial tone
for voicemails, etc.  Flash hook to conference in second person.

I prefer sccp vg224 over mgcp.

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Countryman,
Edward
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:22 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg224 with sccp vs MGCP?

I have a large number of VG224's to configure and deploy.

Any thoughts on pro's/Cons of using SCCP (stcapp) vs. MGCP?  My
application is a large assisted living center and most of the phones
will be resident rooms.

Are there any licensing implications with one over the other?

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/6808c
30d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 48
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:30:06 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
To: "cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Communicator Release Notes
Message-ID:

<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0C8107BE9B at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.loca
l>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Oddly enough I use IP Communicator 7.0(4) with Win7/64-bit and Cisco VPN
Client 5.0.7.29 with no problems but just noticed it's unsupported.....

Release 7.0(5)
Release 7.0(5) has no new features. See the "Resolved Caveats" section
for the list of defects fixed in this release.

Release 7.0(4)
This release provides the following new enhancements:

*Windows 7 32-bit: Professional, Enterprise and Ultimate support
-Cisco Unified Video Advantage is not supported.

*Windows 7 64-bit: Professional, Enterprise and Ultimate support.
-AnyConnect 2.5 is required for this operating system. VPN 5.0.x is not
supported.
-Cisco Unified Video Advantage is not supported.

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/d38b7
cf2/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 84, Issue 8
*****************************************
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for  
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and  
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or  
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please  
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original  
message.

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/d73586f3/attachment.bin>