[cisco-voip] Conference call CDR analysis
Wes Sisk
wsisk at cisco.com
Mon Oct 11 14:12:14 EDT 2010
one note - be careful about posting full e.164 phone numbers for your
employees or customers. this creates targets for spam calls just like
posting full email addresses.
on initial inspection I agree with your assertion. It appears 8024
dialed 2 external numbers and conferenced the the 3(including
themselves) participants together.
8024 jointed the bridge at 13:34 and stayed on for 1 minute. That would
have them dropping at 13:35.
At 13:36 8024 placed another call to number ending 7777 and stayed on
that call for 18 minutes. That call does not appear related to the
conference call.
Termination of the conference is determined by the CM service paramenter
"Drop Ad Hoc Conference".
/Wes
dev wrote:
> Hi CDR experts out there..
>
> I highly appreciate your input on this.
>
> I am trying to understand the call scenario that took place here. Can
> you help clarify it for me. My assumption is that ext 8024 being the
> conference controller here sets up a conference call between the two
> PSTN numbers then hung up out of the conference after 1 minute. Then
> called the same PSTN mobile number again. Am I correct?
>
> If yes, my understanding is that if a conference is left with two
> parties only, they get joined together. Why isn't it happening here?
>
> I have attached the CDR for reference.. Thanks for helping
>
>
>
> *globalcallid_callid* *datetimeconnect * *callingpartynumber*
> *finalcalledpartynumber* *duration* *Lastredirectdn*
> *,origlegcallidentifier* *,destlegidentifier,* *joinonbehalfof*
> *,origcallterminationonbehalfof* *,destcallterminationonbehalfof*
> *comment*
> 241980 2010-09-05 13:33:12.000 8024 90101917777 1 90101917777
> 49364529 49364530 0 4 4
> 241983 2010-09-05 13:33:59.000 8024 900962779260050 0
> 900962779260050 49364559 49364560 0 4 4
> 241980 2010-09-05 13:34:40.000 8024 b00203202002 1 8024
> 49364529 49364572 4 12 0
> ConfControllerDn=8024;ConfControllerDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609;ConfRequestorDn=8024;ConfRequestorDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609
>
> 241980 2010-09-05 13:34:40.000 90101917777 b00203202002 20 8024
> 49364530 49364573 4 12 4
> ConfControllerDn=8024;ConfControllerDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609;ConfRequestorDn=8024;ConfRequestorDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609
>
> 241980 2010-09-05 13:34:40.000 900962779260050 b00203202002 20
> 8024 49364560 49364574 4 12 0
> ConfControllerDn=8024;ConfControllerDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609;ConfRequestorDn=8024;ConfRequestorDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609
>
> 241989 2010-09-05 13:36:38.000 8024 90101917777 18 90101917777
> 49364596 49364597 0 12 0
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101011/bbc43f5a/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list