[cisco-voip] Conference call CDR analysis

Wes Sisk wsisk at cisco.com
Mon Oct 11 14:12:14 EDT 2010


one note - be careful about posting full e.164 phone numbers for your 
employees or customers.  this creates targets for spam calls just like 
posting full email addresses.

on initial inspection I agree with your assertion.  It appears 8024 
dialed 2 external numbers and conferenced the the 3(including 
themselves) participants together.
8024 jointed the bridge at 13:34 and stayed on for 1 minute. That would 
have them dropping at 13:35.
At 13:36 8024 placed another call to number ending 7777 and stayed on 
that call for 18 minutes.  That call does not appear related to the 
conference call.

Termination of the conference is determined by the CM service paramenter 
"Drop Ad Hoc Conference".

/Wes


dev wrote:
> Hi CDR experts out there..
>  
> I highly appreciate your input on this.
>  
> I am trying to understand the call scenario that took place here. Can 
> you help clarify it for me. My assumption is that ext 8024 being the 
> conference controller here sets up a conference call between the two 
> PSTN numbers then hung up out of the conference after 1 minute. Then 
> called the same PSTN mobile number again. Am I correct?
>  
> If yes, my understanding is that if a conference is left with two 
> parties only, they get joined together. Why isn't it happening here?
>  
> I have attached the CDR for reference.. Thanks for helping
>  
>  
>  
> *globalcallid_callid* 	*datetimeconnect * 	*callingpartynumber* 
> *finalcalledpartynumber* 	*duration* 	*Lastredirectdn* 
> *,origlegcallidentifier* 	*,destlegidentifier,* 	*joinonbehalfof* 
> *,origcallterminationonbehalfof* 	*,destcallterminationonbehalfof* 
> *comment*
> 241980 	2010-09-05 13:33:12.000 	8024 	90101917777 	1 	90101917777 
> 49364529 	49364530 	0 	4 	4 	 
> 241983 	2010-09-05 13:33:59.000 	8024 	900962779260050 	0 
> 900962779260050 	49364559 	49364560 	0 	4 	4 	 
> 241980 	2010-09-05 13:34:40.000 	8024 	b00203202002 	1 	8024 
> 49364529 	49364572 	4 	12 	0 
> ConfControllerDn=8024;ConfControllerDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609;ConfRequestorDn=8024;ConfRequestorDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609 
>
> 241980 	2010-09-05 13:34:40.000 	90101917777 	b00203202002 	20 	8024 
> 49364530 	49364573 	4 	12 	4 
> ConfControllerDn=8024;ConfControllerDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609;ConfRequestorDn=8024;ConfRequestorDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609 
>
> 241980 	2010-09-05 13:34:40.000 	900962779260050 	b00203202002 	20 
> 8024 	49364560 	49364574 	4 	12 	0 
> ConfControllerDn=8024;ConfControllerDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609;ConfRequestorDn=8024;ConfRequestorDeviceName=SEP0004F2E66609 
>
> 241989 	2010-09-05 13:36:38.000 	8024 	90101917777 	18 	90101917777 
> 49364596 	49364597 	0 	12 	0 	 
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101011/bbc43f5a/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list