[cisco-voip] Trying to understand partitions, calling and called transformations

Dan Letkeman danletkeman at gmail.com
Thu Oct 21 16:56:54 EDT 2010


Thats good to know.  I will have some DID's in the near future.

I have one more question for you.  What is the process for getting
incoming calling to work?

Sorry for all of the basic questions, I only have experience with CME, not CUCM.

Thanks again,
Dan.

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> yep.
> do you just want the main number for Caller ID?  or do you want the DID of
> each phone?
> if you want the DID then use the mask on the line and use the Check mark on
> the RG to use the line mask.  Makes if really easy if the DID is OK.
> Scott
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Dan Letkeman <danletkeman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> With the transformation mask i'm trying to set the outgoing caller ID.
>>
>> Now it works and I think it makes more sense now.  I have a route
>> group with a route list assigned.  That route list has the
>> transformation mask I need.  That route list is assigned to the route
>> pattern and that route pattern is in the partition i created for that
>> location.  Then I created a calling search space and put that
>> partition in there and assigned that calling search space to one of
>> the phones.
>>
>> So I guess I need to create a separate set of route patterns for every
>> location, because each route pattern can only be in one partition.
>> For example I would need to create a separate route patter for every
>> location I have for 7 digit dialing, 10 digit dialing, etc...?
>>
>> Thanks this is making more sense now.
>>
>> Dan.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The route pattern should have a partition.  the route pattern should
>> > point
>> > to the RL --> RG (get the transformation mask) --> VGW.
>> > Now I would use the CSS on the phone rather then just the DP CSS.  as
>> > more
>> > info as you move forward there is a CSS on both the phone device and
>> > Line.
>> >  The two combine to give you an over all CSS.
>> > What are you trying to do with your transformation mask?  is this to
>> > prefix
>> > going out?  or is this the caller ID going out?
>> > you can see on the voice gateway what it's doing going out by doing a
>> > debug
>> > isdn q931.  This might help in troubleshooting.
>> > Scott
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Dan Letkeman <danletkeman at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Its' starting to make sense.
>> >>
>> >> So my goal here is to assign a different Calling Party Translation
>> >> Mask to the 3 different groups of phones I have.
>> >>
>> >> 1 - Create a route group (assign the gateway to this, as I only have 1
>> >> gateway for everyone)
>> >> 2 - Create a route list (add the route group i just created, then
>> >> click on the route list details and assign the calling party
>> >> transformation mask (1015551234) )
>> >> 3 - Create a device pool for each location and assign the route group
>> >> to the respective device pool (local route group option)
>> >>
>> >> So if a device is assigned to the correct device pool, the calling
>> >> party transformation mask should apply accordingly.
>> >>
>> >> Only problem is it doesn't work.   Am I missing something?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Dan.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >  Dan--
>> >> > Think of Partitions as cups.  inside the cups you put phone lines and
>> >> > Route
>> >> > patterns etc.  Think of Calling search spaces as the buckets that
>> >> > have
>> >> > all
>> >> > the cups in them.
>> >> > If you have all your partitions in a single Calling Search Space and
>> >> > you
>> >> > have access to use that CSS you will be able to call anything in the
>> >> > bucket.
>> >> >  Meaning any cup (partition) with anything in them.
>> >> > Now take it a step further.  You Don't want them to call a specific
>> >> > phone
>> >> > line.  you would put it in a partition that is not in the bucket
>> >> > (CSS).
>> >> >  Then if you have the CSS without the partition, you can no longer
>> >> > call
>> >> > it.
>> >> >  The same is true of route patterns, translation patterns, etc.
>> >> > Hope that helps.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Dan Letkeman <danletkeman at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hello,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm new to CUCM and I'm trying to understand how to configure
>> >> >> calling
>> >> >> and called transformations with partitions and device pools.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I currently have a cluster at the head office, with a PRI and some
>> >> >> test phones connect.  I have three remote offices that will also
>> >> >> connect over fiber to the head office CUCM cluster, and will only
>> >> >> fail
>> >> >> over to SRST via there local router when the wan is down.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I need to  create some kind of group for each of the remote offices
>> >> >> as
>> >> >> well as the main office, so when they are calling in and out of the
>> >> >> PRI they have there own number assigned to there group of phones.
>> >> >> Just like they have it down with there individual PBX's.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have it working so far that I can call out of the PRI.  So I have
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> small understanding of the route pattern's, route groups and route
>> >> >> Lists.  I'm just not sure how I can apply a calling transformation
>> >> >> mask to each of the locations, all while allowing them to call each
>> >> >> other, and call in and out of the PRI.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Any help would be appreciated.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Dan.
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>
>



More information about the cisco-voip mailing list