[cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 90, Issue 19
shobhit sinha
shobhitsinha2k at gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 12:50:19 EDT 2011
hi
7985 Video End Points: 4001, 4002
CUVA: 4003
CTS 500: 8001
MCU Conf Bridge: 7770
Resutl: Audio Conf is working perfectly fine among all these but no video
MCU Hardware: 3515
MCU Software version 5.7
CUCM: 8.0.3
CTMS: 1.7
CTS: 1.6
Good Call while Protocol SCCP is selected in MCU and MCU is registered as a
conf bridge while for Bad Call we are selecting SIP Protocol in MCU.Please
look into this traces and provide the resolution in high priority basis.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, <cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Slow down... speed up. (Scott Voll)
> 2. Re: Anyone doing large-scale VPNs? (Robert Kulagowski)
> 3. iLo2 on HP boxes (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 4. Re: iLo2 on HP boxes (Matthew Loraditch)
> 5. Re: iLo2 on HP boxes (Adel Abushaev)
> 6. Re: iLo2 on HP boxes (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 7. Re: iLo2 on HP boxes (Adel Abushaev)
> 8. Re: iLo2 on HP boxes (Matthew Loraditch)
> 9. Re: iLo2 on HP boxes (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 10. Re: search 911 call via CAR (CUCM 7) (Wes Sisk)
> 11. Re: search 911 call via CAR (CUCM 7) (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 12. Re: UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file (Wes Sisk)
> 13. Re: UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file (Carter, Bill)
> 14. Re: Slow down... speed up. (Wes Sisk)
> 15. MTP won't register (Brian Schultz)
> 16. Re: MTP won't register (Bernhard Albler)
> 17. Re: MTP won't register (Brian Schultz)
> 18. HP iLo2 self-signed certificate to FQDN (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 19. Re: MTP won't register (Adel Abushaev)
> 20. Re: MTP won't register (Bernhard Albler)
> 21. Re: MTP won't register (Bernhard Albler)
> 22. Re: MTP won't register (Brian Schultz)
> 23. iLo2 alerting/alarming (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 24. Meeting Place Express v2.1 - CUCM v8.5
> (Johnny.Crothers at datacraft.co.nz)
> 25. Re: iLo2 alerting/alarming (Jason Aarons (AM))
> 26. Re: iLo2 alerting/alarming (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 27. Re: UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file (Ryan Ratliff (rratliff))
> 28. Re: UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 29. iLo2 errors... (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 30. I must unsuscribe (Jones, Blanche)
> 31. Re: I must unsuscribe (Lelio Fulgenzi)
> 32. Re: UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file (Carter, Bill)
> 33. Re: how to mask internal extension ! (Cristobal Priego)
> 34. LDAP re-homing (Ovidiu Popa)
> 35. Re: UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file (Lewis, Chris)
> 36. Re: Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> (James.Brown at barclayswealth.com)
> 37. Re: LDAP re-homing (Joe Martini)
> 38. Re: SMS notification from RTMT (Abebe Amare)
> 39. Re: LDAP re-homing (Ovidiu Popa)
> 40. Re: LDAP re-homing (Joe Martini)
> 41. Re: SMS notification from RTMT (Scott Voll)
> 42. OT, OSPF on ASA question (Mike King)
> 43. Re: Locales after upgrade to CCM 7 (Wes Sisk)
> 44. Re: Locales after upgrade to CCM 7 (Ovidiu Popa)
> 45. Re: UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file (Carter, Bill)
> 46. Re: OT, OSPF on ASA question (Ferguson John)
> 47. Re: Locales after upgrade to CCM 7 (Wes Sisk)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:20:54 -0700
> From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Slow down... speed up.
> Message-ID: <BANLkTiku0qmRqj42RxQa-J18K3ZigW8M+Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Anyone every have issues with telecommuters having conversations where the
> voice speeds up and slows back down? I'm thinking it's a buffer issue.
> More then likely with the ISP?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/6061bd99/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:47:38 -0500
> From: Robert Kulagowski <rkulagow at gmail.com>
> To: Cisco VOIP <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone doing large-scale VPNs?
> Message-ID: <BANLkTikAbYiNLS5tXKefJtC5aFnphTHyXw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Matthew Loraditch
> <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
> > you are correct about VPNs and ASAs. With your site quantity I'd not want
> to be managing that many tunnels. DMVPN is a router only (with the exception
> of 6500s with certain modules) technology.
> >
> > If all of your hand offs will be ethernet your choice whether to upgrade
> to 2900s or not seems to solely be a throughput/performance question.
>
> That's why it seems ..um.. disappointing that Cisco has so many
> different product lines that are similar, yet different enough to make
> things difficult. Doing additional research using Google shows that
> DMVPN for 55xx has been roadmapped, then removed. I guess the ISR
> business unit has more pull than the ASA BU, because sure, the ASA can
> do 50,000 tunnels, but for site-to-site you've got to type them all in
> one by one, or do a perl script.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:10:09 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
> Message-ID:
> <875372661.148741.1303150209774.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi everyone. I finally configured iLo2 on these new 380GL6 boxes. The iLo2
> licensing doesn't say anything about an expiry date. Not sure where I got
> that info from, honestly, thought I heard it here.
>
> Here's what I see. Am I set? These boxes are on a valid support contract,
> so I guess I'm good? Any ideas?
>
>
>
> iLO 2 Advanced features have been activated.
>
> License Key: <snip>
>
> You have licensed HP iLO 2 Advanced Pack. Future versions containing new
> features will require the purchase of an upgrade or a current HP support
> contract.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/1a8913f4/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:33:34 +0000
> From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
> Message-ID:
> <C75AF2AD9308C246AFBDDB994E3E2983140698 at PHANES.helion.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> If you get the special Cisco SKUs from HP they come with the iLO advanced
> license pre applied.
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:
> support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:10 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
> Hi everyone. I finally configured iLo2 on these new 380GL6 boxes. The iLo2
> licensing doesn't say anything about an expiry date. Not sure where I got
> that info from, honestly, thought I heard it here.
>
> Here's what I see. Am I set? These boxes are on a valid support contract,
> so I guess I'm good? Any ideas?
> ________________________________
> iLO 2 Advanced features have been activated.
>
> License Key: <snip>
>
> You have licensed HP iLO 2 Advanced Pack. Future versions containing new
> features will require the purchase of an upgrade or a current HP support
> contract.
> ________________________________
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/740f4644/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:33:40 -0700
> From: Adel Abushaev <adel.abushaev at gmail.com>
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=6kGiy=9GTPqfw68V2GjVm-bS5Bw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Mine do not have expiration dates either on a few HP boxes that I have
> (primarily ACS appliances). The license is formulated for a feature
> set and will work until there is a major upgrade of iLO firmware. The
> only reason we had to have advanced FS was remote media binding for
> completely remote operation.
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone. I finally configured iLo2 on these new 380GL6 boxes. The
> iLo2
> > licensing doesn't say anything about an expiry date. Not sure where I got
> > that info from, honestly, thought I heard it here.
> >
> > Here's what I see. Am I set? These boxes are on a valid support contract,
> so
> > I guess I'm good? Any ideas?
> >
> > ________________________________
> > iLO 2 Advanced features have been activated.
> >
> > License Key: <snip>
> >
> > You have licensed HP iLO 2 Advanced Pack. Future versions containing new
> > features will require the purchase of an upgrade or a current HP support
> > contract.
> > ________________________________
> > ---
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> > ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
> Message-ID:
> <973605759.150693.1303151957695.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Correct. I ordered the Cisco-ified SKUs. So this license doesn't expire
> then?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:33:34 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
>
>
>
> If you get the special Cisco SKUs from HP they come with the iLO advanced
> license pre applied.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:10 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
>
>
>
> Hi everyone. I finally configured iLo2 on these new 380GL6 boxes. The iLo2
> licensing doesn't say anything about an expiry date. Not sure where I got
> that info from, honestly, thought I heard it here.
>
> Here's what I see. Am I set? These boxes are on a valid support contract,
> so I guess I'm good? Any ideas?
>
>
>
>
> iLO 2 Advanced features have been activated.
>
> License Key: <snip>
>
> You have licensed HP iLO 2 Advanced Pack. Future versions containing new
> features will require the purchase of an upgrade or a current HP support
> contract.
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/8313ed9e/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:39:34 -0700
> From: Adel Abushaev <adel.abushaev at gmail.com>
> To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
> Message-ID: <BANLkTimsjCFVBKLR4xuR3Xvn_hNOBaStdA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Ours came with basic license. We had to order an advanced pack and
> apply it. Sorry for the O/T.
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Loraditch
> <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
> > If you get the special Cisco SKUs from HP they come with the iLO advanced
> > license pre applied.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
> > 1965 Greenspring Drive
> >
> > Timonium, MD 21093
> > support at heliontechnologies.com
> > (p) (410) 252-8830
> > (F) (443) 541-1593
> >
> > Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> > Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!
> >
> >
> >
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:10 PM
> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone. I finally configured iLo2 on these new 380GL6 boxes. The
> iLo2
> > licensing doesn't say anything about an expiry date. Not sure where I got
> > that info from, honestly, thought I heard it here.
> >
> > Here's what I see. Am I set? These boxes are on a valid support contract,
> so
> > I guess I'm good? Any ideas?
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > iLO 2 Advanced features have been activated.
> >
> > License Key: <snip>
> >
> > You have licensed HP iLO 2 Advanced Pack. Future versions containing new
> > features will require the purchase of an upgrade or a current HP support
> > contract.
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > ---
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> > ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:40:30 +0000
> From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
> Message-ID:
> <C75AF2AD9308C246AFBDDB994E3E29831406E1 at PHANES.helion.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Not that I am aware of. The only ones that expire are the evaluation type.
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:
> support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!
>
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:39 PM
> To: Matthew Loraditch
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
> Correct. I ordered the Cisco-ified SKUs. So this license doesn't expire
> then?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:33:34 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
>
> If you get the special Cisco SKUs from HP they come with the iLO advanced
> license pre applied.
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:
> support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:10 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
> Hi everyone. I finally configured iLo2 on these new 380GL6 boxes. The iLo2
> licensing doesn't say anything about an expiry date. Not sure where I got
> that info from, honestly, thought I heard it here.
>
> Here's what I see. Am I set? These boxes are on a valid support contract,
> so I guess I'm good? Any ideas?
> ________________________________
> iLO 2 Advanced features have been activated.
>
> License Key: <snip>
>
> You have licensed HP iLO 2 Advanced Pack. Future versions containing new
> features will require the purchase of an upgrade or a current HP support
> contract.
> ________________________________
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/50e9ffad/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:42:38 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
> Message-ID:
> <
> 1776415385.150964.1303152158243.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Ah - ok. That was probably on the old versions then. Where you activate the
> demo license.
>
> Thanks everyone.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:40:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
>
>
>
> Not that I am aware of. The only ones that expire are the evaluation type.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:39 PM
> To: Matthew Loraditch
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
>
>
>
> Correct. I ordered the Cisco-ified SKUs. So this license doesn't expire
> then?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:33:34 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
>
>
>
> If you get the special Cisco SKUs from HP they come with the iLO advanced
> license pre applied.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:10 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 on HP boxes
>
>
>
>
> Hi everyone. I finally configured iLo2 on these new 380GL6 boxes. The iLo2
> licensing doesn't say anything about an expiry date. Not sure where I got
> that info from, honestly, thought I heard it here.
>
> Here's what I see. Am I set? These boxes are on a valid support contract,
> so I guess I'm good? Any ideas?
>
>
>
>
> iLO 2 Advanced features have been activated.
>
> License Key: <snip>
>
> You have licensed HP iLO 2 Advanced Pack. Future versions containing new
> features will require the purchase of an upgrade or a current HP support
> contract.
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/842f0112/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:47:58 -0400
> From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] search 911 call via CAR (CUCM 7)
> Message-ID: <4DAC875E.1040106 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> When a record falls through CAR's parsing rules it goes into the error
> table.
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/8_5_1/car/carsyerr.html
>
> Examples include:
> CDR duration < 0
> CDR callingPartyNumber is empty
>
> The original intent was for CAR to filter out erroneous events and
> system events from user view. As with any filter it sometimes filters
> good information.
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/15/2011 7:11 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> > What's the error table?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Apr 15, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com
> > <mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> CAR cdr search may not search the error table. I believe this will
> >> work from the CLI on the publisher:
> >>
> >> run sql car select
> >> callingpartynumber,origdevicename,finalcalledpartynumber from
> >> tbl_billing_data where finalcalledpartynumber like '%911'
> >>
> >> run sql car select
> >> callingpartynumber,origdevicename,finalcalledpartynumber from
> >> tbl_billing_error where finalcalledpartynumber like '%911'
> >>
> >>
> >> Note the 2 queries hit 2 different tables.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Wes
> >>
> >> On 4/15/2011 2:10 PM, Burnam, William wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> I?m having a constant problem with users dialing 911 (by accident it
> >>> seems). I need to pull records from CAR to show everyone in the
> >>> system that has dialed 911, but I?m not having any luck. I can
> >>> search by a user?s extension and then sort through the records until
> >>> I find the CDR record that shows the 911 call, but I?m not sure how
> >>> I can simply search for ALL calls (all users) to 911 only. For
> >>> reference I?m using CUCM 7. Can anyone help out with this?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Bill
> >>>
> >>> <mime-attachment.jpg>
> >>>
> >>> Bill Burnam
> >>>
> >>> Systems Engineer, IT
> >>>
> >>> MAPEI Corp.
> >>>
> >>> 1144 E. Newport Center Drive
> >>>
> >>> Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
> >>>
> >>> (954) 246-8703
> >>>
> >>> _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE_
> >>>
> >>> THIS COMMUNICATION, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENT, CONTAINS INFORMATION
> >>> THAT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND THAT MAY ALSO BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, AND IS
> >>> INTENDED ONLY FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL NAMED AS THE
> >>> RECIPIENT. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED
> >>> RECIPIENT, YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR AND ANY
> >>> REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION
> >>> OR ANY ATTACHMENT TO THIS TRANSMISSION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF
> >>> YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY
> >>> NOTIFY THE SENDER BY REPLY E-MAIL AND DELETE AND DESTROY ALL COPIES
> >>> OF THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. THANK YOU.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------CONFIDENTIALITY
> >>> NOTICE
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------- THIS
> >>> COMMUNICATION, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENT, CONTAINS
> >>> INFORMATION THAT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR
> >>> THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL NAMED AS THE
> >>> RECIPIENT. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE
> >>> INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN
> >>> ERROR AND ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR
> >>> COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ANY ATTACHMENT TO THIS
> >>> TRANSMISSION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED
> >>> THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE
> >>> SENDER BY REPLY E-MAIL AND DELETE AND DESTROY ALL COPIES
> >>> OF THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. THANK YOU.
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/a6ebdab1/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] search 911 call via CAR (CUCM 7)
> Message-ID:
> <796565902.151417.1303152569328.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thanks Wes! Good to know.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "William Burnam" <WBurnam at mapei.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:47:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] search 911 call via CAR (CUCM 7)
>
> When a record falls through CAR's parsing rules it goes into the error
> table.
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/8_5_1/car/carsyerr.html
>
> Examples include:
> CDR duration < 0
> CDR callingPartyNumber is empty
>
> The original intent was for CAR to filter out erroneous events and system
> events from user view. As with any filter it sometimes filters good
> information.
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/15/2011 7:11 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
> What's the error table?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 15, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Wes Sisk < wsisk at cisco.com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> CAR cdr search may not search the error table. I believe this will work
> from the CLI on the publisher:
>
> run sql car select callingpartynumber,origdevicename,finalcalledpartynumber
> from tbl_billing_data where finalcalledpartynumber like '%911'
>
> run sql car select callingpartynumber,origdevicename,finalcalledpartynumber
> from tbl_billing_error where finalcalledpartynumber like '%911'
>
>
> Note the 2 queries hit 2 different tables.
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/15/2011 2:10 PM, Burnam, William wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I?m having a constant problem with users dialing 911 (by accident it
> seems). I need to pull records from CAR to show everyone in the system that
> has dialed 911, but I?m not having any luck. I can search by a user?s
> extension and then sort through the records until I find the CDR record that
> shows the 911 call, but I?m not sure how I can simply search for ALL calls
> (all users) to 911 only. For reference I?m using CUCM 7. Can anyone help out
> with this?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> <mime-attachment.jpg>
>
> Bill Burnam
>
> Systems Engineer, IT
>
> MAPEI Corp.
>
> 1144 E. Newport Center Drive
>
> Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
>
> (954) 246-8703
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENT, CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT IS
> CONFIDENTIAL AND THAT MAY ALSO BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, AND IS INTENDED ONLY
> FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL NAMED AS THE RECIPIENT. IF THE
> READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS
> TRANSMISSION IN ERROR AND ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING
> OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ANY ATTACHMENT TO THIS TRANSMISSION IS STRICTLY
> PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE
> IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER BY REPLY E-MAIL AND DELETE AND DESTROY ALL
> COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. THANK YOU .
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------CONFIDENTIALITY
> NOTICE ---------------------------------------------------- THIS
> COMMUNICATION, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENT, CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT IS
> CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL
> NAMED AS THE RECIPIENT. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED
> RECIPIENT, YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR AND ANY REVIEW,
> DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ANY
> ATTACHMENT TO THIS TRANSMISSION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED
> THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER BY REPLY
> E-MAIL AND DELETE AND DESTROY ALL COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. THANK YOU.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/f6e48e76/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:49:58 -0400
> From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
> Message-ID: <4DAC87D6.60703 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> Sure. Just don't subsequently ask any questions about why something
> happened during install or upgrade ;-)
>
> This is a very pointed question. Is there a larger issue at play here?
> Like you're running into disk space issues?
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/16/2011 1:27 PM, Carter, Bill wrote:
> > Can I delete the big file "installdb_12.log" log file?
> > 15 Apr,2011 22:51:45 7,612,035 installdb20110415-225145.log
> > 15 Apr,2011 22:33:20*29,842,563* installdb_l2.log
> > ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> > Bill Carter
> > Senior Business Communications Analyst
> > CCIE 5022
> > Sentinel Technologies
> > SNR 800.860.8060 ext 5015
> > ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/d99020e5/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:51:12 -0500
> From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
> To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
> Message-ID:
> <C0B4574561D1E04DBB500BA062BAF22602F366FC at Mail1.sentinel.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Active Partition is at 99%
>
>
>
> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:50 PM
> To: Carter, Bill
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
>
>
>
> Sure. Just don't subsequently ask any questions about why something
> happened during install or upgrade ;-)
>
> This is a very pointed question. Is there a larger issue at play here?
> Like you're running into disk space issues?
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/16/2011 1:27 PM, Carter, Bill wrote:
>
> Can I delete the big file "installdb_12.log" log file?
>
>
>
> 15 Apr,2011 22:51:45 7,612,035 installdb20110415-225145.log
> 15 Apr,2011 22:33:20 29,842,563 installdb_l2.log
>
>
>
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>
> Bill Carter
>
> Senior Business Communications Analyst
>
> CCIE 5022
>
> Sentinel Technologies
>
> SNR 800.860.8060 ext 5015
>
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/bc38114f/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:53:52 -0400
> From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Slow down... speed up.
> Message-ID: <4DAC88C0.8030307 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> Yep, we've seen it more with soft clients. Traditional RTP handling
> dictated to drop those packets. It's a bit odd in light of specs I am
> aware of. But, it does exist and yes, it's typically network
> jitter/delay or a misbehaving source device.
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/18/2011 12:20 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
> > Anyone every have issues with telecommuters having conversations where
> > the voice speeds up and slows back down? I'm thinking it's a buffer
> > issue. More then likely with the ISP?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/7ed077cf/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:58:53 -0500
> From: Brian Schultz <bms314 at gmail.com>
> To: Cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] MTP won't register
> Message-ID: <BANLkTikUjpgQe7Ly8=kai8U8PFTH0_vFAA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> CUCM 7.1.3.10000-11 and a 2951 router running 15.1(3)T1. I am unable to
> get
> the router to register as a transcode resource. I've tried rebooting the
> router and upgrading IOS. Transcoder is built as an Cisco IOS Media
> Termination Point. Below is my router config. I always see TCP_CONN_ERROR
> for the SCCP status. Am I missing something with the config here? Maybe a
> CUCM bug? This one is really stumping me...
>
> voice-card 0
> dspfarm
> dsp services dspfarm
>
> sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0
> sccp ccm 198.168.225.10 identifier 1 version 7.0
> sccp ccm 198.168.225.11 identifier 2 version 7.0
> sccp ip precedence 3
> sccp
> !
> sccp ccm group 100
> bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0
> associate ccm 2 priority 1
> associate ccm 1 priority 2
> associate profile 6 register MTPf866f218dc20
> keepalive retries 5
> keepalive timeout 10
> switchback method immediate
> switchback interval 30
> !
> dspfarm profile 6 transcode
> codec g711ulaw
> codec g711alaw
> codec g729ar8
> codec g729abr8
> maximum sessions 8
> associate application SCCP
>
>
> #sh sccp
> SCCP Admin State: UP
> Gateway Local Interface: GigabitEthernet0/0
> IPv4 Address: 192.168.148.3
> Port Number: 2000
> IP Precedence: 3
> User Masked Codec list: None
> Call Manager: 198.168.225.10, Port Number: 2000
> Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 1
> Trustpoint: N/A
> Call Manager: 198.168.225.11, Port Number: 2000
> Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 2
> Trustpoint: N/A
>
> Transcoding Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR
> Active Call Manager: NONE
> TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 6
> Reported Max Streams: 16, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
> Supported Codec: g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
> Supported Codec: g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
> Supported Codec: g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
> Supported Codec: g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
> Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
> Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
> Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization
> Period: 30
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/89934bef/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:06:24 +0200
> From: Bernhard Albler <bernhard.albler at gmail.com>
> To: Brian Schultz <bms314 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MTP won't register
> Message-ID: <BANLkTik=GjPnccAKtxa7xs+s8z89BqTJYg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Did you actually configure it on CCM as a IOS Media Termination Point
> or? IOS _Enhanced_ Media Termination Point? You definitely need the
> latter for PVDM2s and PVDM3s.
> Not sure if you would see the TC_Conn Error in the case.
> Can you telnet to port 2000 on the UCM from the router?
>
> regards
> bernhard
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:11:48 -0500
> From: Brian Schultz <bms314 at gmail.com>
> To: Bernhard Albler <bernhard.albler at gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MTP won't register
> Message-ID: <BANLkTim0tufjVmOo03F2ZO0Gg2MpOp29HA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I've tried as both IOS Media Termination Point and IOS Enhanced Media
> Termination Point. Rebuilt router config after each and reset in CUCM,
> same
> issue.
>
> I can telnet to both CUCM IP's on port 2000 just fine from the router and
> don't have any firewalls in between.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Bernhard Albler
> <bernhard.albler at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Did you actually configure it on CCM as a IOS Media Termination Point
> > or IOS _Enhanced_ Media Termination Point? You definitely need the
> > latter for PVDM2s and PVDM3s.
> > Not sure if you would see the TC_Conn Error in the case.
> > Can you telnet to port 2000 on the UCM from the router?
> >
> > regards
> > bernhard
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/88a62566/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:20:59 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] HP iLo2 self-signed certificate to FQDN
> Message-ID:
> <277576948.153437.1303154459283.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Anyone know how to force the iLo2 security system to generate the
> self-signed cert based on the FQDN?
>
> I hate getting those errors where it says it's the wrong host. FF deals
> with it nicely, but you need to use IE to use remote console and IE
> complains with the big red CERTIFICATE ERROR.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/a12db495/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:27:45 -0700
> From: Adel Abushaev <adel.abushaev at gmail.com>
> To: Brian Schultz <bms314 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MTP won't register
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinVeo3=r5W0PmzzefoWLBiSGrr_Zg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Try to configure them as an IOS Enhanced MTP and reset them after you
> configure them, then do "no sccp", "sccp" on the router.
>
> Is your Sub in sync with Pub?
>
> A.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Brian Schultz <bms314 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've tried as both IOS Media Termination Point and IOS Enhanced Media
> > Termination Point.? Rebuilt router config after each and reset in CUCM,
> same
> > issue.
> >
> > I can telnet to both CUCM IP's on port 2000 just fine from the router and
> > don't have any firewalls in between.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Bernhard Albler <
> bernhard.albler at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Did you actually configure it on CCM as a IOS Media Termination Point
> >> or? IOS _Enhanced_ Media Termination Point? You definitely need the
> >> latter for PVDM2s and PVDM3s.
> >> Not sure if you would see the TC_Conn Error in the case.
> >> Can you telnet to port 2000 on the UCM from the router?
> >>
> >> regards
> >> bernhard
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:30:00 +0200
> From: Bernhard Albler <bernhard.albler at gmail.com>
> To: Brian Schultz <bms314 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MTP won't register
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=UEWhxLGAN=xd-DZvHVTpniVoH6w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> What names did you enter when inputing the enhanced media Termination
> Point? MTP... or just the MAC ?
> Next step would be to check the logs (GW or UCM) or a packet capture
> via utils network capture on the UCM.
> The second option would definitely help to check source adresses and
> wether the packets even reach the UCM.
>
> cheers
> bernhard
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 21
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:33:36 +0200
> From: Bernhard Albler <bernhard.albler at gmail.com>
> To: Brian Schultz <bms314 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MTP won't register
> Message-ID: <BANLkTimyrpS8UPgL13GnTW5W6iqY5o-OGA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Also maybe you could post your interface config. I am assuming no VRFs
> are configured?
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:04:14 -0500
> From: Brian Schultz <bms314 at gmail.com>
> To: Bernhard Albler <bernhard.albler at gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MTP won't register
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinK-HE1HP_KfiqkfJV57xLtDapXeQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Here is a screenshot and interface config. Pretty basic config here...
>
> Health2951#telnet 192.168.225.10 2000 /source-interface g0/0
> Trying 192.168.225.10, 2000 ... Open
>
>
> quit
>
>
> [Connection to 192.168.225.10 closed by foreign host]
> Health2951#sh run int g0/0
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 155 bytes
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet0/0
> ip address 192.168.148.3 255.255.255.0
> no ip redirects
> no ip unreachables
> no ip proxy-arp
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> end
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Bernhard Albler
> <bernhard.albler at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > What names did you enter when inputing the enhanced media Termination
> > Point? MTP... or just the MAC ?
> > Next step would be to check the logs (GW or UCM) or a packet capture
> > via utils network capture on the UCM.
> > The second option would definitely help to check source adresses and
> > wether the packets even reach the UCM.
> >
> > cheers
> > bernhard
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/e121ad4d/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 23
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:41:56 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 alerting/alarming
> Message-ID:
> <
> 1242863501.158844.1303159316645.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I'm a little disappointed in the alerting/alarming options for iLo2. I
> would have thought they'd have syslog at least.
>
> What are others doing for this? I guess I could use SNMP alerting, but not
> sure how effective that is.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/3bd32c0a/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 24
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:54:16 +1200
> From: <Johnny.Crothers at datacraft.co.nz>
> To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Meeting Place Express v2.1 - CUCM v8.5
> Message-ID:
> <
> A0C4637C20DE02419E6142E16FE683570662D16B at nz-wlg-exmb01.Datacraft-Asia.Com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I've trawled through the documentation on CCO to see if there is a
> compatibility matrix for these two products however I can only find a
> matrix that shows up to CUCM 7.x.
>
>
>
>
>
> Does anyone know if MPE is supported in CUCM 8.5?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Johnny
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *****************************************************************************
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
>
> http://www.datacraft-asia.com/disclaimer
>
> *****************************************************************************
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/ea30e98b/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 25
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:29:14 -0400
> From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 alerting/alarming
> Message-ID:
>
> <4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0C9F52E072 at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I would recommend the free HP Systems Insight Manager, it knows the MIBs
> for HP hardware.
>
> You really need each Vendors (IBM, Dell, HP) free hardware monitoring tools
> to best monitor their hardware unless you want to spend some time doing MIB
> customizing on your SNMP platform, or use something like thwack.com for
> Solarwinds, etc.
>
>
> http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/management/hpsim/dl_windows.html
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 4:42 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 alerting/alarming
>
> I'm a little disappointed in the alerting/alarming options for iLo2. I
> would have thought they'd have syslog at least.
>
> What are others doing for this? I guess I could use SNMP alerting, but not
> sure how effective that is.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and
> privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named
> above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified
> that you have received this communication in error and that any use or
> reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
> computer. Thank you.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/61348832/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 26
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:54:34 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLo2 alerting/alarming
> Message-ID:
> <
> 1950279518.161842.1303163674781.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> yeah, that's what the tech support said. i'm sure it's all fancy and
> everything, but we're so into syslog here and it works well. we use SEC to
> parse through syslog entries and can set up pretty complicated (or simple if
> you want it) alarms.
>
> time permitting, i might look at insight manager. another group has an SNMP
> server running. hopefully they can work with the alert all and ignore as
> required rather than the alert as required model.
>
> thanks.
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 5:29:14 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] iLo2 alerting/alarming
>
>
>
>
> I would recommend the free HP Systems Insight Manager, it knows the MIBs
> for HP hardware.
>
>
>
> You really need each Vendors (IBM, Dell, HP) free hardware monitoring tools
> to best monitor their hardware unless you want to spend some time doing MIB
> customizing on your SNMP platform, or use something like thwack.com for
> Solarwinds, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/management/hpsim/dl_windows.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 4:42 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 alerting/alarming
>
>
>
>
> I'm a little disappointed in the alerting/alarming options for iLo2. I
> would have thought they'd have syslog at least.
>
> What are others doing for this? I guess I could use SNMP alerting, but not
> sure how effective that is.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/5bfddddd/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 27
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:56:30 -0400
> From: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com>
> To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>, "Carter, Bill"
> <bcarter at sentinel.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
> Message-ID: <3a6e01cbfe13$7455194d$0c3fa348 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> That file is on /activelog. If you run out of space there the system will
> clean up files for you.
>
> Like Wes said, what led you to ask about this?
>
> Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Sure. Just don't subsequently ask any questions about why something
> happened during install or upgrade ;-)
>
> This is a very pointed question. Is there a larger issue at play here?
> Like you're running into disk space issues?
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/16/2011 1:27 PM, Carter, Bill wrote:
> > Can I delete the big file "installdb_12.log" log file?
> > 15 Apr,2011 22:51:45 7,612,035 installdb20110415-225145.log
> > 15 Apr,2011 22:33:20*29,842,563* installdb_l2.log
> > ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> > Bill Carter
> > Senior Business Communications Analyst
> > CCIE 5022
> > Sentinel Technologies
> > SNR 800.860.8060 ext 5015
> > ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 28
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
> Message-ID:
> <
> 1231698382.162489.1303165076332.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> on a similar note.... are these the files i review if i want to ensure my
> install went fine?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com>
> To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>, "Bill Carter" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 5:56:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
>
> That file is on /activelog. If you run out of space there the system will
> clean up files for you.
>
> Like Wes said, what led you to ask about this?
>
> Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Sure. Just don't subsequently ask any questions about why something
> happened during install or upgrade ;-)
>
> This is a very pointed question. Is there a larger issue at play here?
> Like you're running into disk space issues?
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/16/2011 1:27 PM, Carter, Bill wrote:
> > Can I delete the big file "installdb_12.log" log file?
> > 15 Apr,2011 22:51:45 7,612,035 installdb20110415-225145.log
> > 15 Apr,2011 22:33:20*29,842,563* installdb_l2.log
> > ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> > Bill Carter
> > Senior Business Communications Analyst
> > CCIE 5022
> > Sentinel Technologies
> > SNR 800.860.8060 ext 5015
> > ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/88bba991/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 29
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:32:59 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] iLo2 errors...
> Message-ID:
> <965057797.162969.1303165979140.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I'm seeing a few errors on all the hosts. Just wondering if anyone has seen
> these? I could have sworn I saw them discussed on the list, but a search
> brings up nothing.
>
>
>
> 1785-Drive Array not Configured
> 1794-Drive Array - Array Accelerator Battery Charge Low
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/9797f698/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 30
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:25:17 -0400
> From: "Jones, Blanche" <Blanche.Jones at brookfield.com>
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] I must unsuscribe
> Message-ID:
> <
> DA178FDEFB10F44FA77035F349D01E420576EAE566 at NA1BTMBX02.brookfieldproperties.com
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Puck et al
>
>
> As my subscribed account is a business account
> I never anticipated the amount of email,
> However I have found it interesting and insightful
> At this time I can no longer afford to have that much
> Mail..
>
> Please tell me how to unsubscribe
>
> Sincerely
>
> Blanche.jones at brookfield.com
>
>
>
> Blanche Jones
>
> Network Analyst
>
>
>
> Brookfield Corporate Operations
>
> Technology Services
>
> Three World Financial Center
> 200 Vesey Street
> 25th Floor, New York, NY 10281-1010
>
> T 212.417.2559, F 212.417.7214
>
> Blanche.Jones at brookfield.com
>
>
>
> [cid:image18eec1.GIF at 1eb323b6.4694a537]
>
>
>
> View Important disclosures and information about our e-mail policies here<
> http://www.brookfield.com/emaildisclaimer>.
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/addfa19f/attachment-0001.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image18eec1.GIF
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 2131 bytes
> Desc: image18eec1.GIF
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/addfa19f/attachment-0001.gif
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 31
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:06:15 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: Blanche Jones <Blanche.Jones at brookfield.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I must unsuscribe
> Message-ID:
> <
> 1792485922.163883.1303167975348.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> take a look at the bottom of any email from the list. there is a link to
> unsubscribe.
>
> here's what it looks like:
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Blanche Jones" <Blanche.Jones at brookfield.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 6:25:17 PM
> Subject: [cisco-voip] I must unsuscribe
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Puck et al
>
>
>
>
>
> As my subscribed account is a business account
>
> I never anticipated the amount of email,
>
> However I have found it interesting and insightful
>
> At this time I can no longer afford to have that much
>
> Mail..
>
>
>
> Please tell me how to unsubscribe
>
>
>
> Sincerely
>
>
>
> Blanche.jones at brookfield.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Blanche Jones
>
> Network Analyst
>
>
>
>
>
> Brookfield Corporate Operations
>
> Technology Services
>
> Three World Financial Center
> 200 Vesey Street
> 25th Floor , New York , NY 10281-1010
>
> T 212.417.2559 , F 212.417.7214
>
> Blanche.Jones at brookfield.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Brookfield Logo
>
>
>
> View Important disclosures and information about our e-mail policies here .
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/0a9172ab/attachment-0001.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image18eec1.GIF
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 2131 bytes
> Desc: image18eec1.GIF
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/0a9172ab/attachment-0001.gif
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 32
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:18:28 -0500
> From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
> To: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
> Message-ID: <5ABA8F9B-AE9C-4A9F-B28C-F6EA7C80BFBD at sentinel.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Did an upgrade. MCS-7825-H3 with two 160GB hard drives. 12 hours post
> upgrade, active partition still at 99% used space. I used RTMT to clear out
> all trace and log files, except install/upgrade.
>
>
> On Apr 18, 2011, at 4:56 PM, "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> > That file is on /activelog. If you run out of space there the system will
> clean up files for you.
> >
> > Like Wes said, what led you to ask about this?
> >
> > Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sure. Just don't subsequently ask any questions about why something
> > happened during install or upgrade ;-)
> >
> > This is a very pointed question. Is there a larger issue at play here?
> > Like you're running into disk space issues?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wes
> >
> > On 4/16/2011 1:27 PM, Carter, Bill wrote:
> >> Can I delete the big file "installdb_12.log" log file?
> >> 15 Apr,2011 22:51:45 7,612,035 installdb20110415-225145.log
> >> 15 Apr,2011 22:33:20*29,842,563* installdb_l2.log
> >> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >> Bill Carter
> >> Senior Business Communications Analyst
> >> CCIE 5022
> >> Sentinel Technologies
> >> SNR 800.860.8060 ext 5015
> >> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 33
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:06:12 -0700
> From: Cristobal Priego <cristobalpriego at gmail.com>
> To: Cisco Voip <cisco_newbie at yahoo.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] how to mask internal extension !
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=Yh7bZBN1_GtBb7CSH=FkyGr8oyg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> what does the debug
> debug voice translation rule shows on R1 ?
>
> 2011/4/17 Cisco Voip <cisco_newbie at yahoo.com>
>
> >
> > Hi all experts.
> >
> >
> >
> > I will be thankful if some one can guide me whats going on in my
> scenario.
> > Pls dont be scared with such a long post.
> >
> >
> >
> > Following is my diagram
> >
> >
> >
> > (ext
> >
> 1001)CIPC----------------R1---------------------------R2--------------------CIPC(ext
> > 2001)
> >
> >
> >
> > I am running CME on both R1 and R2 with just one CIPC registered to each.
> > Now i made the following dial-peers on R1 and R2
> >
> >
> >
> > R1
> > dail-peer voice 2001 voip
> > destination-pattern 2...
> > session target ipv4:172.16.1.2 (R2's IP)
> >
> >
> >
> > R2
> > dail-peer voice 1001 voip
> > destination-pattern 1...
> > session target ipv4:172.16.1.1 (R1's IP)
> >
> >
> >
> > Now i made the call from 1001 (and vice versa) and call was successful.
> Now
> > what i wanted to do
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) When the call is made from 1001 to 2001, calling-number should
> translate
> > to 0213561000. For this i configured
> >
> >
> >
> > On R1:
> >
> >
> >
> > voice translation-rule 1
> > rule 1 /1001/ /0213561000/
> >
> >
> >
> > voice translation-profile Calling-number
> > translate calling 1
> >
> >
> >
> > dial-peer v 1001
> > translation-profile outgoing Calling-number
> >
> >
> >
> > Now when i made the call from 1001 to 2001, i can see on 2001 that the
> call
> > is coming from 0213561000. Again successful !
> >
> >
> >
> > Now this is the problem part. I want to dial 0213561000 from 2001, and in
> > background it should be translated to 1001. I configured the following
> >
> >
> >
> > on R2:
> >
> >
> >
> > dial-peer voice 1 voip
> > destination-pattern 0213561000
> > session-target ipv4:172.16.1.1
> >
> >
> >
> > on R1
> >
> >
> >
> > voice translation-rule 2
> > rule 1 /0213561000/ /1001/
> >
> >
> >
> > voice translation-profile Called-number
> > translate calling 2
> >
> >
> >
> > dial-peer voice 1 voip
> > incoming called-number 0213561000
> > translation-profile incoming Called-number
> >
> >
> >
> > Now when i dial 0213561000 from 2001, it makes the call and suddenly on
> > display it changes to 1001 !!! Why is this so ?
> >
> >
> >
> > I did some research and changed the protocol to sip. Now using wireshark,
> i
> > was clearly able to see that 1001 was send as remote-party-id. But how to
> > solve it in H323 environment ?
> >
> >
> >
> > To put it simple, i want to mask my internal extensions, so that when the
> > call is made from 2001 to 0213561000. the display should also show
> > 0213561000 and not 1001.
> >
> >
> >
> > Pls guys, take out some time to help me out.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110418/b11d3a38/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 34
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:14:53 +0200
> From: Ovidiu Popa <ovi.popa at gmail.com>
> To: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] LDAP re-homing
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=RTi90=TkQt3farL-5EVgntv7Ktg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello everyone
>
> Any caveats to re-homing a CUCM cluster to another LDAP server (AD to
> ADAM/LDS)?
> Should we expect some impact (e.g. user associations to device profiles,
> etc)?
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/e92679b2/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 35
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:23:48 -0500
> From: "Lewis, Chris" <Chris.Lewis at magnetar.com>
> To: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
> Message-ID:
> <
> 6F86181EE7C6F94F9360249562D85BAB4674F8436C at EVPRODEXCH02.magnetar.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I am also interested in what should be done here.
>
> I usually delete old trace files etc if required but have not got any
> details of working thresholds for respective partitions etc. If anyone does
> have any info then that would be great.
>
> Chris
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
> Sent: 18 April 2011 19:51
> To: Wes Sisk
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
>
> Active Partition is at 99%
>
> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:50 PM
> To: Carter, Bill
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
>
> Sure. Just don't subsequently ask any questions about why something
> happened during install or upgrade ;-)
>
> This is a very pointed question. Is there a larger issue at play here?
> Like you're running into disk space issues?
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/16/2011 1:27 PM, Carter, Bill wrote:
> Can I delete the big file "installdb_12.log" log file?
>
>
> 15 Apr,2011 22:51:45 7,612,035 installdb20110415-225145.log
>
> 15 Apr,2011 22:33:20 29,842,563 installdb_l2.log
>
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> Bill Carter
> Senior Business Communications Analyst
> CCIE 5022
> Sentinel Technologies
> SNR 800.860.8060 ext 5015
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cisco-voip mailing list
>
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> The information contained in this message and its attachments
> is intended only for the private and confidential use of the
> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient
> (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the
> sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized
> copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-
> mail is strictly prohibited.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/cdc0d627/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 36
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:04:20 +0100
> From: <James.Brown at barclayswealth.com>
> To: <wsisk at cisco.com>, <puck at positivenetworks.co.uk>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> Message-ID:
> <
> 08BFDAE5252F4C4EAE26F5ECF3782323060E254EE8 at LDNPCMMGMB15.INTRANET.BARCAPINT.COM
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Wes,
>
> This is a huge step forward in the locale documentation. Well done and
> thank you. One minor observation/clarification...
>
> "If you need network tones for which we have no supported User Locale yet,
> you will need to apply the Combined Network Locale Installer". Is this
> because "combined" means all languages are bundled into a single installer
> and hence a tone from a different locale than your own would be adequate?
>
> Regards
>
> James.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
> Sent: 15 April 2011 16:29
> To: Puck
> Cc: Brown, James : Barclays Wealth; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
>
> Earlier in another Locale thread I cited a snippet of a FAQ. The complete
> Locale FAQ is now posted for public consumption. Please let me know any
> feedback:
>
> http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cucm-phone-locale-installers
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/15/2011 4:20 AM, Puck wrote:
> > Thanks James.
> >
> > I think we are going to find the same also. Will post an update to this
> thread next week after the upgrade is completed!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Glen
> >
> > On 14 Apr 2011, at 10:10,<James.Brown at barclayswealth.com> <
> James.Brown at barclayswealth.com> wrote:
> >
> >> A log-out then back in appears to be necessary on our site when changing
> locales - resetting alone is not sufficient if a UDP is logged in.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> James.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
> >> Sent: 13 April 2011 19:29
> >> To: Puck
> >> Cc: PUCK
> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> >>
> >> Glen,
> >>
> >> My contacts indicate that phones must logout of EM, reset, login to EM
> to pickup locale changes. I have not verified this in the lab.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Wes
> >>
> >> On 4/13/2011 11:01 AM, Puck wrote:
> >>> Hi Wes,
> >>>
> >>> So no need to log users in and out or change the locales it should just
> pickup the new locale on reboot and download?
> >>>
> >>> Is there anyway to tell the locale that the phone is currently using ?
> e.g. confirm that it has taken the new locale?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Glen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 13 Apr 2011, at 15:55, Wes Sisk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> When the phones reset they should TFTP download new locale files. If
> not then verify the phones are getting proper TFTP address and TFTP
> transfers are working.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Wes
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/13/2011 10:43 AM, Puck wrote:
> >>>>> HI,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am upgrading from CCM 6.1.4 to 7.1.5. The client has multiple
> Locales installed for the phones.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After I have uploaded the new locales to each of the updated 7.1.5
> cluster and rebooted the cluster, do I just need to reboot the phones, or I
> read somewhere a while ago that I may need to change the locale from the
> current to another, let it change and then switch it back to the correct
> locale.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What is the process to get the new locale activated on the phones? Do
> I need to log users in and out?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Glen
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> Barclays Wealth is the wealth management division of Barclays Bank PLC.
> This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays
> Group.
> >>
> >> The availability of products and services may be limited by the
> applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions. The Barclays Group
> does not normally accept or offer business instructions via internet email.
> Any action that you might take upon this message might be at your own risk.
> >>
> >> This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for
> the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this email in
> error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and
> do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this email or its
> attachments.
> >>
> >> Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or without
> viruses. The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss
> arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet
> communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses.
> Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational
> or business reasons.
> >>
> >> Any opinion or other information in this email or its attachments that
> does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the
> sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.
> >>
> >> Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales (registered no.
> 1026167).
> >> Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.
> >>
> >> Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 37
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:14:15 -0400
> From: Joe Martini <joemar2 at cisco.com>
> To: Ovidiu Popa <ovi.popa at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP re-homing
> Message-ID: <85AB8073-9001-43C1-B912-0247BE7C07E1 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> You shouldn't have any impact as long as you're syncing on the same
> attribute, if you change the attribute used for the UserID you need to make
> sure you have a BAT export prior to be able to redo the device user
> associations and roles, etc.
>
> Joe
>
> On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Ovidiu Popa wrote:
>
> Hello everyone
>
> Any caveats to re-homing a CUCM cluster to another LDAP server (AD to
> ADAM/LDS)?
> Should we expect some impact (e.g. user associations to device profiles,
> etc)?
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 38
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:09:34 +0300
> From: Abebe Amare <abucho at gmail.com>
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SMS notification from RTMT
> Message-ID: <BANLkTiki8kmFEQ1cBL1-PNEnTam5dDd_Cw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I live in Africa. Does AT&T offer their service
> for non-customers? Currently I am testing Ozeki NG SMS gateway. It works
> great.
>
> Regards,
>
> Abebe
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Most SMS stuff can be accomplished with an email...... eg. Att wireless
> > phones use your cell number at txt.att.net
> >
> http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/messaging-internet/messaging/faq.jsp#email
> >
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Abebe Amare <abucho at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you Nicholas,
> >>
> >> I was hoping to do it without putting in an additional email-to-sms
> >> gateway.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> Abebe
> >>
> >> On 4/18/11, Nicholas Samios <nsamios at staff.iinet.net.au> wrote:
> >> > It can only send email alerts, doesn't mean you can't setup a GSM
> >> gateway to
> >> > reach the email-to-sms functionality desired.
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abebe Amare
> >> > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 4:12 PM
> >> > To: cisco voip
> >> > Subject: [cisco-voip] SMS notification from RTMT
> >> >
> >> > Can RTMT (module version 7.0(147), server version 6.1.3.1000-16) send
> >> SMS
> >> > notification based on configured alerts?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance,
> >> >
> >> > Abebe
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
> >> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/58d6ac54/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 39
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:19:14 +0200
> From: Ovidiu Popa <ovi.popa at gmail.com>
> To: Joe Martini <joemar2 at cisco.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP re-homing
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinr_5O5ecUe459n5Pcrct5AfZqY6g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> We are just changing the IP address of the server. No other
> re-configuration
> is considered for this migration.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Joe Martini <joemar2 at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> > You shouldn't have any impact as long as you're syncing on the same
> > attribute, if you change the attribute used for the UserID you need to
> make
> > sure you have a BAT export prior to be able to redo the device user
> > associations and roles, etc.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Ovidiu Popa wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone
> >
> > Any caveats to re-homing a CUCM cluster to another LDAP server (AD to
> > ADAM/LDS)?
> > Should we expect some impact (e.g. user associations to device profiles,
> > etc)?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ovidiu
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/0b2238d2/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 40
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:29:54 -0400
> From: Joe Martini <joemar2 at cisco.com>
> To: Ovidiu Popa <ovi.popa at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP re-homing
> Message-ID: <A0CC8812-4EC0-4936-BF13-D4E4F99CF093 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> You should be fine then, but I would just to be safe make sure you have a
> good backup prior to the change.
>
> Joe
>
> On Apr 19, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Ovidiu Popa wrote:
>
> We are just changing the IP address of the server. No other
> re-configuration is considered for this migration.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Joe Martini <joemar2 at cisco.com> wrote:
> You shouldn't have any impact as long as you're syncing on the same
> attribute, if you change the attribute used for the UserID you need to make
> sure you have a BAT export prior to be able to redo the device user
> associations and roles, etc.
>
> Joe
>
> On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Ovidiu Popa wrote:
>
> Hello everyone
>
> Any caveats to re-homing a CUCM cluster to another LDAP server (AD to
> ADAM/LDS)?
> Should we expect some impact (e.g. user associations to device profiles,
> etc)?
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/0b579354/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 41
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:18:56 -0700
> From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> To: Abebe Amare <abucho at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SMS notification from RTMT
> Message-ID: <BANLkTin4ucy7FbCVQ=pDkPgC=V_WHRyurw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Don't know about Africa..... but in the US the Cell phone carriers provide
> some sort of Email address for SMS services.
>
> YMMV
>
> Scott
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Abebe Amare <abucho at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion. I live in Africa. Does AT&T offer their
> service
> > for non-customers? Currently I am testing Ozeki NG SMS gateway. It works
> > great.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Abebe
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Most SMS stuff can be accomplished with an email...... eg. Att wireless
> >> phones use your cell number at txt.att.net
> >>
> http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/messaging-internet/messaging/faq.jsp#email
> >>
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Abebe Amare <abucho at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thank you Nicholas,
> >>>
> >>> I was hoping to do it without putting in an additional email-to-sms
> >>> gateway.
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>>
> >>> Abebe
> >>>
> >>> On 4/18/11, Nicholas Samios <nsamios at staff.iinet.net.au> wrote:
> >>> > It can only send email alerts, doesn't mean you can't setup a GSM
> >>> gateway to
> >>> > reach the email-to-sms functionality desired.
> >>> >
> >>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >>> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abebe Amare
> >>> > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 4:12 PM
> >>> > To: cisco voip
> >>> > Subject: [cisco-voip] SMS notification from RTMT
> >>> >
> >>> > Can RTMT (module version 7.0(147), server version 6.1.3.1000-16) send
> >>> SMS
> >>> > notification based on configured alerts?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks in advance,
> >>> >
> >>> > Abebe
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/06713c71/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 42
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:25:14 -0400
> From: Mike King <me at mpking.com>
> To: Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] OT, OSPF on ASA question
> Message-ID: <BANLkTik3aAzDaNCojRn=rEf9kFNJppNm8A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Like myself, many of you wear multiple hats.
>
> Have any of you run across an equivalent command to "*ospf* auto-cost *
> reference*-*bandwidth"* for the ASA series?
>
> Mike
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/e7f4875d/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 43
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:29:08 -0400
> From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: James.Brown at barclayswealth.com
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, puck at positivenetworks.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> Message-ID: <4DAD9C34.6050808 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Updated:
>
> User locales are produced individually and are specific to a language
> and country combination. Network locales are generally produced as a
> single package intended to cover all supported countries. Network
> locales may be referred to to as combined network locales.
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/19/2011 8:04 AM, James.Brown at barclayswealth.com wrote:
> > Wes,
> >
> > This is a huge step forward in the locale documentation. Well done and
> thank you. One minor observation/clarification...
> >
> > "If you need network tones for which we have no supported User Locale
> yet, you will need to apply the Combined Network Locale Installer". Is this
> because "combined" means all languages are bundled into a single installer
> and hence a tone from a different locale than your own would be adequate?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > James.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
> > Sent: 15 April 2011 16:29
> > To: Puck
> > Cc: Brown, James : Barclays Wealth; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> >
> > Earlier in another Locale thread I cited a snippet of a FAQ. The
> complete Locale FAQ is now posted for public consumption. Please let me
> know any feedback:
> >
> > http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cucm-phone-locale-installers
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wes
> >
> > On 4/15/2011 4:20 AM, Puck wrote:
> >> Thanks James.
> >>
> >> I think we are going to find the same also. Will post an update to this
> thread next week after the upgrade is completed!
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Glen
> >>
> >> On 14 Apr 2011, at 10:10,<James.Brown at barclayswealth.com> <
> James.Brown at barclayswealth.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> A log-out then back in appears to be necessary on our site when
> changing locales - resetting alone is not sufficient if a UDP is logged in.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> James.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
> >>> Sent: 13 April 2011 19:29
> >>> To: Puck
> >>> Cc: PUCK
> >>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> >>>
> >>> Glen,
> >>>
> >>> My contacts indicate that phones must logout of EM, reset, login to EM
> to pickup locale changes. I have not verified this in the lab.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Wes
> >>>
> >>> On 4/13/2011 11:01 AM, Puck wrote:
> >>>> Hi Wes,
> >>>>
> >>>> So no need to log users in and out or change the locales it should
> just pickup the new locale on reboot and download?
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there anyway to tell the locale that the phone is currently using ?
> e.g. confirm that it has taken the new locale?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Glen
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 13 Apr 2011, at 15:55, Wes Sisk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> When the phones reset they should TFTP download new locale files. If
> not then verify the phones are getting proper TFTP address and TFTP
> transfers are working.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Wes
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 4/13/2011 10:43 AM, Puck wrote:
> >>>>>> HI,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am upgrading from CCM 6.1.4 to 7.1.5. The client has multiple
> Locales installed for the phones.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After I have uploaded the new locales to each of the updated 7.1.5
> cluster and rebooted the cluster, do I just need to reboot the phones, or I
> read somewhere a while ago that I may need to change the locale from the
> current to another, let it change and then switch it back to the correct
> locale.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What is the process to get the new locale activated on the phones?
> Do I need to log users in and out?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Glen
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>> Barclays Wealth is the wealth management division of Barclays Bank PLC.
> This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays
> Group.
> >>>
> >>> The availability of products and services may be limited by the
> applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions. The Barclays Group
> does not normally accept or offer business instructions via internet email.
> Any action that you might take upon this message might be at your own risk.
> >>>
> >>> This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for
> the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this email in
> error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and
> do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this email or its
> attachments.
> >>>
> >>> Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or without
> viruses. The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss
> arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet
> communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses.
> Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational
> or business reasons.
> >>>
> >>> Any opinion or other information in this email or its attachments that
> does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the
> sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.
> >>>
> >>> Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales (registered no.
> 1026167).
> >>> Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.
> >>>
> >>> Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 44
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:47:52 +0200
> From: Ovidiu Popa <ovi.popa at gmail.com>
> To: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
> Cc: puck at positivenetworks.co.uk, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> Message-ID: <BANLkTimuFAHEX0X9u+6FL1vLH7CCYvUCEg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Excellent document.
>
> Just a quick-note: the link to the IP Phone localization matrix and CUCM
> localization Matrix points to cisco-dev. Removing -dev will make it
> "click-able".
>
> Thanks for the document.
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> > Updated:
> >
> > User locales are produced individually and are specific to a language and
> > country combination. Network locales are generally produced as a single
> > package intended to cover all supported countries. Network locales may be
> > referred to to as combined network locales.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wes
> >
> >
> > On 4/19/2011 8:04 AM, James.Brown at barclayswealth.com wrote:
> >
> >> Wes,
> >>
> >> This is a huge step forward in the locale documentation. Well done and
> >> thank you. One minor observation/clarification...
> >>
> >> "If you need network tones for which we have no supported User Locale
> yet,
> >> you will need to apply the Combined Network Locale Installer". Is this
> >> because "combined" means all languages are bundled into a single
> installer
> >> and hence a tone from a different locale than your own would be
> adequate?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> James.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
> >> Sent: 15 April 2011 16:29
> >> To: Puck
> >> Cc: Brown, James : Barclays Wealth; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> >>
> >> Earlier in another Locale thread I cited a snippet of a FAQ. The
> complete
> >> Locale FAQ is now posted for public consumption. Please let me know any
> >> feedback:
> >>
> >> http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cucm-phone-locale-installers
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Wes
> >>
> >> On 4/15/2011 4:20 AM, Puck wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks James.
> >>>
> >>> I think we are going to find the same also. Will post an update to this
> >>> thread next week after the upgrade is completed!
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Glen
> >>>
> >>> On 14 Apr 2011, at 10:10,<James.Brown at barclayswealth.com> <
> >>> James.Brown at barclayswealth.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A log-out then back in appears to be necessary on our site when
> changing
> >>>> locales - resetting alone is not sufficient if a UDP is logged in.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>>
> >>>> James.
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
> >>>> Sent: 13 April 2011 19:29
> >>>> To: Puck
> >>>> Cc: PUCK
> >>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> >>>>
> >>>> Glen,
> >>>>
> >>>> My contacts indicate that phones must logout of EM, reset, login to EM
> >>>> to pickup locale changes. I have not verified this in the lab.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Wes
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/13/2011 11:01 AM, Puck wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Wes,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So no need to log users in and out or change the locales it should
> just
> >>>>> pickup the new locale on reboot and download?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there anyway to tell the locale that the phone is currently using
> ?
> >>>>> e.g. confirm that it has taken the new locale?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Glen
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 13 Apr 2011, at 15:55, Wes Sisk wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When the phones reset they should TFTP download new locale files.
> If
> >>>>>> not then verify the phones are getting proper TFTP address and TFTP
> >>>>>> transfers are working.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Wes
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 4/13/2011 10:43 AM, Puck wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> HI,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I am upgrading from CCM 6.1.4 to 7.1.5. The client has multiple
> >>>>>>> Locales installed for the phones.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> After I have uploaded the new locales to each of the updated 7.1.5
> >>>>>>> cluster and rebooted the cluster, do I just need to reboot the
> phones, or I
> >>>>>>> read somewhere a while ago that I may need to change the locale
> from the
> >>>>>>> current to another, let it change and then switch it back to the
> correct
> >>>>>>> locale.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What is the process to get the new locale activated on the phones?
> Do
> >>>>>>> I need to log users in and out?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Glen
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>>> Barclays Wealth is the wealth management division of Barclays Bank
> PLC.
> >>>> This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays
> >>>> Group.
> >>>>
> >>>> The availability of products and services may be limited by the
> >>>> applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions. The Barclays
> Group
> >>>> does not normally accept or offer business instructions via internet
> email.
> >>>> Any action that you might take upon this message might be at your own
> risk.
> >>>>
> >>>> This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely
> for
> >>>> the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure
> under
> >>>> applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this
> email in
> >>>> error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your
> system and
> >>>> do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this email or
> its
> >>>> attachments.
> >>>>
> >>>> Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or without
> >>>> viruses. The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any
> loss
> >>>> arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any
> Internet
> >>>> communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any
> viruses.
> >>>> Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for
> operational
> >>>> or business reasons.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any opinion or other information in this email or its attachments that
> >>>> does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to
> the
> >>>> sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.
> >>>>
> >>>> Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales (registered no.
> >>>> 1026167).
> >>>> Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.
> >>>>
> >>>> Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial
> Services
> >>>> Authority.
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/e409b70e/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 45
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:48:23 -0500
> From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)"
> <rratliff at cisco.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
> Message-ID:
> <C0B4574561D1E04DBB500BA062BAF22602F36896 at Mail1.sentinel.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Yes they are.
>
>
>
> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 5:18 PM
> To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; Wes Sisk; Carter, Bill
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
>
>
>
> on a similar note.... are these the files i review if i want to ensure my
> install went fine?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com>
> To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>, "Bill Carter" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 5:56:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 7.1(5) - BIG install log file
>
> That file is on /activelog. If you run out of space there the system will
> clean up files for you.
>
> Like Wes said, what led you to ask about this?
>
> Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Sure. Just don't subsequently ask any questions about why something
> happened during install or upgrade ;-)
>
> This is a very pointed question. Is there a larger issue at play here?
> Like you're running into disk space issues?
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/16/2011 1:27 PM, Carter, Bill wrote:
> > Can I delete the big file "installdb_12.log" log file?
> > 15 Apr,2011 22:51:45 7,612,035 installdb20110415-225145.log
> > 15 Apr,2011 22:33:20*29,842,563* installdb_l2.log
> > ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> > Bill Carter
> > Senior Business Communications Analyst
> > CCIE 5022
> > Sentinel Technologies
> > SNR 800.860.8060 ext 5015
> > ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/1232bc91/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 46
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:34:40 -0500
> From: Ferguson John <FergusonJohnD at johndeere.com>
> To: Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT, OSPF on ASA question
> Message-ID:
> <9888B4B030DA5A4C8BE6B612D0D612D702EB6ECFCD at edxmb25.jdnet.deere.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are trying to hook-up a E&M port from a Cisco Router to a Kenwood
> Trunking controller, and we are not having any success, has anyone ever
> attempted this?
>
> Thanks
> John Ferguson
> John Deere - Global Infrastructure Services
> 515-267-3265- office
> 515-360-2140 - cell
> FergusonJohnD at JohnDeere.Com<mailto:BantzJohnF%40JohnDeere.Com>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/dc1a9bbb/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 47
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:55:24 -0400
> From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: Ovidiu Popa <ovi.popa at gmail.com>
> Cc: puck at positivenetworks.co.uk, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> Message-ID: <4DADB06C.1030003 at cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> Good catch, Thank you. The link is fixed now.
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 4/19/2011 10:47 AM, Ovidiu Popa wrote:
> > Excellent document.
> >
> > Just a quick-note: the link to the IP Phone localization matrix and
> > CUCM localization Matrix points to cisco-dev. Removing -dev will make
> > it "click-able".
> >
> > Thanks for the document.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ovidiu
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com
> > <mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Updated:
> >
> > User locales are produced individually and are specific to a
> > language and country combination. Network locales are generally
> > produced as a single package intended to cover all supported
> > countries. Network locales may be referred to to as combined
> > network locales.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wes
> >
> >
> > On 4/19/2011 8:04 AM, James.Brown at barclayswealth.com
> > <mailto:James.Brown at barclayswealth.com> wrote:
> >
> > Wes,
> >
> > This is a huge step forward in the locale documentation. Well
> > done and thank you. One minor observation/clarification...
> >
> > "If you need network tones for which we have no supported User
> > Locale yet, you will need to apply the Combined Network Locale
> > Installer". Is this because "combined" means all languages are
> > bundled into a single installer and hence a tone from a
> > different locale than your own would be adequate?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > James.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com <mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>]
> > Sent: 15 April 2011 16:29
> > To: Puck
> > Cc: Brown, James : Barclays Wealth; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> >
> > Earlier in another Locale thread I cited a snippet of a FAQ.
> > The complete Locale FAQ is now posted for public consumption.
> > Please let me know any feedback:
> >
> > http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cucm-phone-locale-installers
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wes
> >
> > On 4/15/2011 4:20 AM, Puck wrote:
> >
> > Thanks James.
> >
> > I think we are going to find the same also. Will post an
> > update to this thread next week after the upgrade is
> > completed!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Glen
> >
> > On 14 Apr 2011, at 10:10,<James.Brown at barclayswealth.com
> > <mailto:James.Brown at barclayswealth.com>>
> > <James.Brown at barclayswealth.com
> > <mailto:James.Brown at barclayswealth.com>> wrote:
> >
> > A log-out then back in appears to be necessary on our
> > site when changing locales - resetting alone is not
> > sufficient if a UDP is logged in.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > James.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf
> > Of Wes Sisk
> > Sent: 13 April 2011 19:29
> > To: Puck
> > Cc: PUCK
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Locales after upgrade to CCM 7
> >
> > Glen,
> >
> > My contacts indicate that phones must logout of EM,
> > reset, login to EM to pickup locale changes. I have
> > not verified this in the lab.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wes
> >
> > On 4/13/2011 11:01 AM, Puck wrote:
> >
> > Hi Wes,
> >
> > So no need to log users in and out or change the
> > locales it should just pickup the new locale on
> > reboot and download?
> >
> > Is there anyway to tell the locale that the phone
> > is currently using ? e.g. confirm that it has
> > taken the new locale?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Glen
> >
> >
> > On 13 Apr 2011, at 15:55, Wes Sisk wrote:
> >
> > When the phones reset they should TFTP
> > download new locale files. If not then verify
> > the phones are getting proper TFTP address and
> > TFTP transfers are working.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wes
> >
> > On 4/13/2011 10:43 AM, Puck wrote:
> >
> > HI,
> >
> > I am upgrading from CCM 6.1.4 to 7.1.5.
> > The client has multiple Locales installed
> > for the phones.
> >
> > After I have uploaded the new locales to
> > each of the updated 7.1.5 cluster and
> > rebooted the cluster, do I just need to
> > reboot the phones, or I read somewhere a
> > while ago that I may need to change the
> > locale from the current to another, let it
> > change and then switch it back to the
> > correct locale.
> >
> > What is the process to get the new locale
> > activated on the phones? Do I need to log
> > users in and out?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Glen
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > Barclays Wealth is the wealth management division of
> > Barclays Bank PLC. This email may relate to or be sent
> > from other members of the Barclays Group.
> >
> > The availability of products and services may be
> > limited by the applicable laws and regulations in
> > certain jurisdictions. The Barclays Group does not
> > normally accept or offer business instructions via
> > internet email. Any action that you might take upon
> > this message might be at your own risk.
> >
> > This email and any attachments are confidential and
> > intended solely for the addressee and may also be
> > privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable
> > law. If you are not the addressee, or have received
> > this email in error, please notify the sender
> > immediately, delete it from your system and do not
> > copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this
> > email or its attachments.
> >
> > Internet communications are not guaranteed to be
> > secure or without viruses. The Barclays Group does not
> > accept responsibility for any loss arising from
> > unauthorised access to, or interference with, any
> > Internet communications by any third party, or from
> > the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this email
> > may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational
> > or business reasons.
> >
> > Any opinion or other information in this email or its
> > attachments that does not relate to the business of
> > the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is
> > not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.
> >
> > Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales
> > (registered no. 1026167).
> > Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP,
> > United Kingdom.
> >
> > Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the
> > Financial Services Authority.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/14a85267/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 90, Issue 19
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110419/494a573f/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list