[cisco-voip] FXS or FXO?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

So if wanted to route to/from the Avaya and Cisco I'd have to have a set of avaya:FXS to cisco:FXO and a set of avaya:FXO to cisco:FXS ? 

I'm used to PRIs... 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Norton" <mikenorton at pwsd76.ab.ca> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, "Edward Countryman" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org> 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 3:24:17 PM 
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] FXS or FXO? 




No, you can’t route from a station port. But the station port is on the Avaya side and Edward said he wanted to route * to * the station port, not from it. 



-- 

Mike Norton 

I.T. Support 

Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76 

Helpdesk: 780-831-3080 

Direct: 780-831-3076 





From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca] 
Sent: April-29-11 1:18 PM 
To: Norton, Mike 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; Edward Countryman 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXS or FXO? 




ya learn something new every day! ;) 

although i'm sure i'll forget this. 

can you route out an FXS port though? i guess that's where i'm confused. 
----- Original Message -----


From: "Mike Norton" <mikenorton at pwsd76.ab.ca> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "Edward Countryman" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org> 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 3:14:08 PM 
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] FXS or FXO? 




Um... no. Like ports do not connect. One sides needs to provide battery and dialtone, and one sides needs to accept battery and dialtone. Always office ports to station ports. 



In this scenario, since the Avaya is provide the station port, you need an office port on the Cisco. 



-- 

Mike Norton 

I.T. Support 

Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76 

Helpdesk: 780-831-3080 

Direct: 780-831-3076 







From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi 
Sent: April-29-11 1:07 PM 
To: Edward Countryman 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXS or FXO? 





If what you're trying to do is this: 

avaya:FXS <-----> FX?:Cisco 

I don't think you can. 

an FXS port is just that, a station port. 

I believe you have to do this: 

avaya:FXO <-----> FXO:Cisco 

There _may_ be FXS/FXO converters out there from the likes of Viking, etc. but I think FXO to FXO is what you want/need. 


--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 



From: "Edward Countryman" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org> 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 2:55:00 PM 
Subject: [cisco-voip] FXS or FXO? 




Looking for a quick answer on something. 



For a specific scenario, I need to route calls from Cisco to an analog “station port” on one of my Avaya’s. 



Question is; do I need an FXO or an FXS in my router to accomplish this? 




_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110429/27882795/attachment.html>