[cisco-voip] enhanced SRST.... too bad CME density

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

ok, this doesn't make sense. according to the E-SRST site (link below), the NME-UMG supports 250 SRST sites, the NME-UMG-EC supports 1000 sites, the SRE-700 and SRE-900 both support 1000 sites. 

the NME-UMG is more than double the cost of the SRE-700, the NME-UMG-EC is double the cost of the NME-UMG. the SRE-900 is less than double the cost of the SRE-700. 

why would one pick one over the other? is there a documentation or pricing error? 

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6788/vcallcon/ps2169/data_sheet_c78-632010.html 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
To: "cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2011 5:48:12 PM 
Subject: enhanced SRST.... too bad CME density 


just looking at enhanced SRST. looked good but too bad it only supports CME density on the remote gateways. might look at it as an option when we upgrade our remote sites to 3945/Es. 

Bit of a price hit since it looks like you have to buy the UMG module for the HQ _and_ license it as well. But it might be worth it in the end. 

Not sure if I saw that the partitions and CSS migration covered dial peers and stuff though.... 

Thoughts? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110804/5bac196f/attachment.html>