[cisco-voip] ACME Packet

[Paul]

Do you have any experience with Cisco's PGW2200 as well?

I'm assuming two Acme Packet boxes can be setup in a redundant fashion to replace the PGW2200 which will be end-of-support in 2017. The PGW2200 is a very resilient platform and CCM Session Manager Edition looks to be the replacement path but CCM SME does *not* failover gracefully like its predecessor since if the primary cluster dies, all calls go with it. It's a real problem when there's 2k calls on the wire. :(

Guess I'll have to play around with the two Acme Packet boxes I have in the lab to find out more.


________________________________
From: Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com>
To: Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com> 
Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ACME Packet

My experience has been positive. :)

I started using Acme Packet SBC's in 2006. You won't find a more powerful platform for SIP as it has all kinds of intricate capabilities. TAC is 24x7 and the product is 100% developed at HQ just outside of Boston. For some folks that is important.


On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:53 AM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:

> Can anyone share their experiences with ACME Packet SBC?  Good, bad, ugly?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip