[cisco-voip] 8.0 or 8.5

[David Zhars]

Bug ID: CSCti45564

At Tue Jan 25 19:01:13 EST 2011 on node BRX-UC1, the following
SyslogSeverityMatchFound events generated:
SeverityMatch : Critical
MatchedEvent : Jan 25 19:01:01 BRX-UC1 local4 2 : 126492: BRX-UC1: Jan 25
2011 19:01:01.646 -0500: %CSA-2-EVENT_ASVC_CONF_DENY:
%[PID=12307][component=CiscoSecurityAgent] : The process '/bin/chown' (as
user root(0) group root(0)) attempted to modify a Cisco Security Agent
resource file /common/log/taos-log-b/syslog/csalog which is located in a
Cisco directory. The operation was denied. [rule 1639]
AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:

>  what is the exact alarm you receive in RTMT?
>
>
> On 2/10/2011 7:35 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>
> As to the original question, I have heard good things about 8.5.  I am a
> recent 8.0 upgrade myself (from the abandoned no man's land of 4.1), and
> haven't run into any bugs yet that are showstoppers.  (one bug through RTMT
> keeps telling me that a cisco service tried to write to a file and was
> denied.  In trolling the bug toolkit, it seems that the service DOES write
> to the file just fine, but for some reason, the error is raised).
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Bill Riley <bill at hitechconnection.net>wrote:
>
>> All gateways are H.323 or SIP except for a few VG224's.  Yes I am going to
>> setup a Intercluster Trunk.
>>
>> Yes on the IOS question. I only need transcoding at the site that has
>> UCCX.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Aarons (US) [mailto:jason.aarons at us.didata.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:32 PM
>> To: Bill Riley; 'Ed Leatherman'
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>  Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 8.0 or 8.5
>>
>> I hope you have H323/SIP dial peers and not MGCP, or are you setting up a
>> Intercluster Trunk, etc?
>>
>> Is your IOS high enough to have the SCCP 8.0+ keyword for sccp resoucrce
>> registration (mtp, cfb, transcoding) ?
>>
>> I've done what your doing before, it has it's own set of headaches.  I
>> once
>> had two clustesr, one got upgraded and everybody got moved, other got
>> upgraded, everybody moved, never really stopped as back in the 4x days we
>> had so many bugs you didn't want to just upgrade production..
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill Riley
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 8:54 AM
>> To: 'Ed Leatherman'
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 8.0 or 8.5
>>
>> I am at CUCM 6.1 and UCCX 5.0. So in order to go to 8.5 I have to go
>>
>> UCCX 7.02 ->CUCM7.1 -> UCCX 8.0 -> CUCM 8.0 -> UCCX 8.5 -> CUCM 8.5
>>
>> Also the end users are not allowed to have local admin rights so the CAD
>> will not auto upgrade. Plus we are 24x7 and have thousands of calls an
>> hour.
>>
>>
>> I am thinking about building a new cluster offline of CUCM 8.5 and UCCX
>> 8.5
>> and then swinging the sites over one by one.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 3:09 PM
>> To: Bill Riley
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 8.0 or 8.5
>>
>> I have heard through the grapevine that there are a number of defects on
>> CCX
>> 8.0 that are not resolved until 8.5. I've been meaning to spelunk the bug
>> toolkit to try and identify them for my own planning.
>> Supposedly the bugs are HA related.
>>
>> What is a pain though is you'll need to upgrade UCCX to 8.0, then upgrade
>> CUCM to 8.0, THEN upgrade UCCX to 8.5 (assuming you are on some version
>> less
>> than 8 for both apps).
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Bill Riley <bill at hitechconnection.net>
>> wrote:
>> > Has anyone deployed 8.5 yet? I am getting ready to upgrade and
>> > question if I should go directly to CUCM 8.5 and UCCX 8.5 or stay with
>> > 8.0 that has been out for a while.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ed Leatherman
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> -----------------------------------------
>> Disclaimer:
>>
>> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and
>> privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named
>> above only.  If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby
>> notified
>> that you have received this communication in error and that any use or
>> reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may
>> be
>> unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>> us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
>> computer. Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing listcisco-voip at puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110211/0a32f68c/attachment.html>