[cisco-voip] Cisco Unified Personal Communicator (CUPC) vs Cisco IP Communicator (CIPC)

Erick B. erickbee at gmail.com
Fri Feb 25 18:26:55 EST 2011


They are both a softphone, and let you make phone calls. But CUPC doesn't
have all phone features/functions compared to IP Communicator so it may be
boil down to user preferences if they had been using IP communicator before.
I prefer IP communicator over CUPC for phone calls. Don't really do much IM
or other stuff with CUPC when I use it though.


On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Jason Aarons (US) <
jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:

> If customer is deploying CUPS 8.5 with CUPC (Cisco Unified Personal
> Communicator) is there any reason to put Cisco IP Communicator on their
>  computer as well?  Doesn’t CUPC replace IP Communicator for those customers
> running CUPS 8.5 with Callmanager 8.0?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [image: DDIPT] <http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/>
>
> * Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110225/0b06fe6d/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list