[cisco-voip] Cisco Unified Personal Communicator (CUPC) vs Cisco IP Communicator (CIPC)

[Jason Aarons (US)]

Actually they are using UCCE but this wasn't for Agents.

If they did have Agents using CIPC I wonder if CUPS Desk Phone Control is supported.

From: matthn at gmail.com [mailto:matthn at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Nick Matthews
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 12:52 PM
To: Erick B.
Cc: Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Unified Personal Communicator (CUPC) vs Cisco IP Communicator (CIPC)

Also - if you're using the softphone for UCCX CIPC is still the only supported softphone.  Think DR, remote agents, etc.

CSF devices are on the roadmap, I don't think there are any announced dates yet.

-nick
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Erick B. <erickbee at gmail.com<mailto:erickbee at gmail.com>> wrote:
They are both a softphone, and let you make phone calls. But CUPC doesn't have all phone features/functions compared to IP Communicator so it may be boil down to user preferences if they had been using IP communicator before. I prefer IP communicator over CUPC for phone calls. Don't really do much IM or other stuff with CUPC when I use it though.

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons at us.didata.com<mailto:jason.aarons at us.didata.com>> wrote:
If customer is deploying CUPS 8.5 with CUPC (Cisco Unified Personal Communicator) is there any reason to put Cisco IP Communicator on their  computer as well?  Doesn't CUPC replace IP Communicator for those customers running CUPS 8.5 with Callmanager 8.0?
________________________________
<http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/>

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. <http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/>
 <http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/>
 <http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/>

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/>
 <http://dimensiondata.stream57.com/04141pm/>


-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110226/0bda2719/attachment.html>