[cisco-voip] how to add 9 for redial
John.VanLaecke at ghd.com
John.VanLaecke at ghd.com
Sun Jan 30 21:12:21 EST 2011
Peter,
On the translation patten you match for on incoming calls all I have done
is at the (prefix digits) outgoing calls is used 91.. This will add the 91
for USA based calls.
Regards,
John Van Laecke
Senior Voice Engineer
GHD Accomplish More Together
T: 61 7 3316 4456 | M:0427 015 232 | V: 414456 | E: John.vanlaecke at ghd.com
Level 2, 201 Charlotte Street QLD AUSTRALIA | www.ghd.com.au
Water | Energy & Resources | Environment | Property & Buildings |
Transportation
Please consider the environment before printing this email
From:
Peter Slow <peter.slow at gmail.com>
To:
Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, WBurnam at mapei.com
Cc:
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Date:
31/01/2011 03:13 AM
Subject:
Re: [cisco-voip] how to add 9 for redial
Sent by:
cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
I am doing this right now for a few thousand phones on a callmanager
cluster. i cant talk to what steps you really need to take to accomplish
that if you want to look at it,,.
-Pete
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
wrote:
Can you elaborate on "fair undertaking" ?
>From what I understand, all that is required is to modify (or copy) route
patterns so they understand the normalized patterns. And then to begin
marking inbounds calls appropriately with the normalized characters. Now,
obviously that's oversimplified, namely because of the potential number
of route patterns, but are there more significant steps? Admittedly I
haven't read to deeply into this section, so I'm shooting from the hip a
bit here. :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Tanner Ezell <tanner.ezell at gmail.com> wrote:
This is correct and is becoming very popular; eventually everyone will be
E164 compatible. That said, if you're not already using this it would be a
fair undertaking to convert your cluster over.
Using the Device Pool to prefix a 9 looks ugly when it rings (as it will
show the 9 prefix) but it is the easiest way to make this work without
serious changes to your dial plan configurations.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
There is also the concept of normalized dial plans. I have not got my head
completely around this yet, but I think it works that offnet calls are
marked with a + sign and no longer require a 9 to get out. It's obviously
a bit more involved than that, but it should work. Users can still use a 9
to get an outside line, if you so program the system.
Sent from my iPod
On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Joel Perez <tman701 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bill,
Unfortunately that is one "feature" that isnt handled in an elegant/easy
fashion at all on CUCM. At least nothing that I have seen in my search for
similar solutions.
There are 3 easy ways of trying to handle that issue that have worked for
me in the past, even though it has been a while since ive done it. Most
customers just accept it.
1) If its an MGCP gateway then you can handle it using the "Service
Paramaters -->CallManager Service" section and set the prefix to 9,
91...etc. (you'rs isnt an MGCP GW)
2) If its an h323 GW then you can try a translation rule to prefix what
you need. Example:
voice translation-rule 1
rule 1 /^/ /9/
voice translation-profile InboundVoice
translate calling 1
3) You can also try going to translation patterns and adding the prefix on
your inbound translation patterns under "Calling Party Transformations"
you add the "9" prefix.
The one caveat to the above is that callers will see all their inbound
calls prefixed with a "9" on their display. I suggest #3 as a quick and
easy way of doing it and testing it on one translation pattern using a DID
not used or your own DID pointed at your DN.
I havent done this in a while so results may vary. Im just going by memory
here.
Hope that helps, and hopefully someone can chime in if they have found an
easier way or better way of doing it.
Joel P.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Tanner Ezell <tanner.ezell at gmail.com>
wrote:
Bill,
The one way is to use the device pool settings. Under Incoming Calling
Party Settings you have the ability to add prefix digits for National,
International, Unknown and Subscriber. In most cases it would be a 9,
9011, 91, 9 but is highly dependent on your dialplan and current
configuration.
Cheers
Tanner Ezell
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Burnam, William <WBurnam at mapei.com>
wrote:
I have a request from my management to do the following:
>From their Cisco IP phones, when they view a number from the RECEIVED or
MISSED calls directory they want to be able to simply highlight one of
those OUTSIDE numbers and press dial and it will actually dial the number.
The current problem is that we require a ?9? to get an outside line. They
don?t want to press edit and add the 9 in front of these numbers, they
believe they should simply be able to highlight those numbers, press dial
and the system will know dial 9 for the outside line then dial the number
that was highlighted.
Is there a way to do this in CUCM 7?
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Burnam
Systems Engineer, IT
MAPEI Corp.
1144 E. Newport Center Drive
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
THIS COMMUNICATION, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENT, CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT IS
CONFIDENTIAL AND THAT MAY ALSO BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, AND IS INTENDED ONLY
FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL NAMED AS THE RECIPIENT. IF THE
READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU HAVE RECEIVED
THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR AND ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR
COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ANY ATTACHMENT TO THIS TRANSMISSION IS
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR,
PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER BY REPLY E-MAIL AND DELETE AND
DESTROY ALL COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. THANK YOU.
------------------------------------------------------CONFIDENTIALITY
NOTICE ---------------------------------------------------- THIS
COMMUNICATION, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENT, CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT IS
CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL
NAMED AS THE RECIPIENT. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR AND ANY REVIEW,
DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ANY
ATTACHMENT TO THIS TRANSMISSION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE
RECEIVED THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER
BY REPLY E-MAIL AND DELETE AND DESTROY ALL COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE.
THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_____________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_____________________
This email and all attachments are confidential. For further important information about emails sent to or from GHD or if you have received this email in error, please refer to http://www.ghd.com/emaildisclaimer.html .
_____________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110131/304d7d8c/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list