[cisco-voip] CUBE and CUCM Codec Preference

Nick Matthews matthnick at gmail.com
Sat Jul 30 11:24:30 EDT 2011


Are the call failures inbound or outbound?

Are you doing early offer forced?

Do you have the same voice class codec on both the incoming and
outgoing dial peers?

-nick

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Casper, Steven <SCASPER at mtb.com> wrote:
> Does voice class codec preference work between Call Manager and CUBE for Sip
> Trunking?
>
>
>
> I can set my codec preference to G711ulaw and my CUCM regions to G711ulaw or
> codec preference to G729r8 and regions to G729 and everything works fine.
>  If I set:
>
>
>
> voice class codec 1
>
> codec preference 1 g729r8
>
> codec preference 2 g711ulaw
>
>
>
> and create a mix of G729 and G711 regions for phones the G729 Region phones
> work and phones in a G711 region also negotiate to G729.  If I flip the
> preference only the G711 region phones work and phones in G729 regions get
> reorder. Looks like they are still trying to use G711.
>
> I was hoping to use a mix of G729 and G711 calling across IP Trunking.
>
>
>
> CUCM is 7.1.5 and CUBE is 15.1(3)T1
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve
>
> ************************************
> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is
> intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended
> recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying,
> distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission.
> If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or
> hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic personal information
> about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
> and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly or indirectly reuse or
> disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services
> for which you are receiving the information.
> There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The
> sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
> service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
> receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
> ************************************
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>



More information about the cisco-voip mailing list