[cisco-voip] SCCP Version Question

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Ah yes. V17 issues as well. That affects SRST compatibility which affects IOS and CUE. It's a bit of a domino effect. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:25 AM, "Lewis, Chris" <Chris.Lewis at magnetar.com> wrote:

> I recall this from one of the previous discussions on here
> 
>  
> 
> https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8131
> 
>  
> 
> Not sure if that was what you were thinking of.
> 
>  
> 
> Chris
> 
>  
> 
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: 01 March 2011 15:14
> To: STEVEN CASPER
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP Version Question
> 
>  
> 
> here are some notes from my upgrades project. i suspect they didn't want to go through multiple firmware upgrades.
> 
> 7942/62
>     For all SCCP firmware upgrades from firmware release versions earlier than 8.3(3)
>     to version 8.5(2)SR1 or greater, you must first upgrade your firmware to version 
>     8.5(2). Once you have upgraded to version 8.5(2), you can upgrade your IP Phone 
>     to version 8.5(2)SR1 or later.
> 
>  
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
> 
> 
> From: "STEVEN CASPER" <SCASPER at mtb.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2011 10:06:06 AM
> Subject: [cisco-voip] SCCP Version Question
> 
> We will soon be gaining responsibility for a Call Manager cluster running 7.1.3.30000-1. Reviewing the system I noticed that all of the 7942/62 & 7941/61 phones are not running the default firmware sccp 8-5-2SR1 but are on 8-4-4S. The current keepers of the cluster indicated that when they upgraded there was a good reason for not upgrading firmware but are not sure why now. Was 8-4-4 a breakpoint of some sort or can any one think of a reason the phones were not upgraded? I am thinking that maybe they just did not want to go through the hassle and risk at the time but you never know.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for nay input,
> 
>  
> 
> Steve
> 
> ************************************
> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission.  If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
> There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
> ************************************
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> The information contained in this message and its attachments 
> is intended only for the private and confidential use of the 
> intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient 
> (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the 
> sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized 
> copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-
> mail is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110301/ee02fde1/attachment.html>