[cisco-voip] SCCP Version Question

Lewis, Chris Chris.Lewis at magnetar.com
Tue Mar 1 10:25:28 EST 2011


I recall this from one of the previous discussions on here

https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8131

Not sure if that was what you were thinking of.

Chris

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: 01 March 2011 15:14
To: STEVEN CASPER
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP Version Question

here are some notes from my upgrades project. i suspect they didn't want to go through multiple firmware upgrades.
________________________________
7942/62
    For all SCCP firmware upgrades from firmware release versions earlier than 8.3(3)
    to version 8.5(2)SR1 or greater, you must first upgrade your firmware to version
    8.5(2). Once you have upgraded to version 8.5(2), you can upgrade your IP Phone
    to version 8.5(2)SR1 or later.
________________________________

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

________________________________
From: "STEVEN CASPER" <SCASPER at mtb.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2011 10:06:06 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] SCCP Version Question
We will soon be gaining responsibility for a Call Manager cluster running 7.1.3.30000-1. Reviewing the system I noticed that all of the 7942/62 & 7941/61 phones are not running the default firmware sccp 8-5-2SR1 but are on 8-4-4S. The current keepers of the cluster indicated that when they upgraded there was a good reason for not upgrading firmware but are not sure why now. Was 8-4-4 a breakpoint of some sort or can any one think of a reason the phones were not upgraded? I am thinking that maybe they just did not want to go through the hassle and risk at the time but you never know.

Thanks for nay input,

Steve
************************************
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission.  If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
************************************
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

The information contained in this message and its attachments 
is intended only for the private and confidential use of the 
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient 
(or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the 
sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized 
copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-
mail is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110301/375c8ee1/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list