[cisco-voip] Calling Party Number issue with ONNET calls

[Mac GroupStudy]

How about something like this:

Site A to B uses a translation pattern that matches what users dial from A
to reach B 50.4001 with DDI PreDot on Called Party. Calling Party
Transformation Prefixes to 30 onto the A Site Calling Phone so that it shows
up correctly at Site B for calling them right back. Do the opposite at Site
B by building a Translation pattern of 30.4001 again with DDI of PreDot on
the Called Party. For B to A Calling Party, again Prefix but prefix a 50
onto the Calling Party to make it easy on the users at Site A for calling
back to Site B again.

Does that make sense? I know this will work as I have used it for
overlapping numbers and Site Codes like you are using. I used extensions of
4001 as if it were overlapping numbers in your scenario as well. If thats
not the case and you have non-contiguous numbers you may have to build a
couple of Translation to accommodate all the numbers. Control access to the
Translations with a Partitions.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Cool Boy <collboy80 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> I have a problem with Calling number on ONNET to ONNET calls. I am using 4
> digits DN for each site and each site has its own site code to reach another
> site. When a user form Site A to dial Site B calls gets connected but caller
> see only 4 Digit for incoming calls. I tried to use the Calling Party
> transformation mask but have no luck yet. Please assist.
>
>
>
> Site A DN  = 4000,  Site A code = 30
>
> Site B DN = 4000, Site B Code = 50
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110308/9b209081/attachment.html>