[cisco-voip] nanp routing sanity check
Wes Sisk
wsisk at cisco.com
Tue Nov 15 09:01:51 EST 2011
>From the NANP file LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL is:
# 1+01XXXX+1+[2-9][02-9]XXXXX
P: 101 TRANSIT-NETWORK-ESCAPE
P: XXXX TRANSIT-NETWORK
P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P: [2-9][02-9]X OFFICE-CODE
P: XXXX SUBSCRIBER
T: N
# 1+01XXXX+1+[2-9]X[02-9]XXXX
P: 101 TRANSIT-NETWORK-ESCAPE
P: XXXX TRANSIT-NETWORK
P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P: [2-9]X[02-9] OFFICE-CODE
P: XXXX SUBSCRIBER
T: N
# 1+[2-9]11
P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P: [2-9]11 SERVICE
T: N
U: Y
# 1+[2-9][02-9]XXXXX
P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P: [2-9][02-9]X OFFICE-CODE
P: XXXX SUBSCRIBER
T: N
# 1+[2-9]X[02-9]XXXX
P: 1 LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P: [2-9]X[02-9] OFFICE-CODE
P: XXXX SUBSCRIBER
T: N
Regards,
Wes
On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:
I have need to implement a change to our routing...even though it works as designed.
Route filter to catch 7 digit numbers:
(AREA-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND COUNTRY-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND LOCAL-AREA-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL DOES-NOT-EXIST)
I'm not sure about the "LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL DOES-NOT-EXIST" part. I would think that 7 digit IS local direct dial. Am I off base here?
Erick
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list