[cisco-voip] nanp routing sanity check

Wes Sisk wsisk at cisco.com
Tue Nov 15 09:01:51 EST 2011


>From the NANP file LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL is:

# 1+01XXXX+1+[2-9][02-9]XXXXX
P:  101             TRANSIT-NETWORK-ESCAPE
P:  XXXX            TRANSIT-NETWORK
P:  1               LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P:  [2-9][02-9]X    OFFICE-CODE
P:  XXXX            SUBSCRIBER
T:  N

# 1+01XXXX+1+[2-9]X[02-9]XXXX
P:  101             TRANSIT-NETWORK-ESCAPE
P:  XXXX            TRANSIT-NETWORK
P:  1               LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P:  [2-9]X[02-9]    OFFICE-CODE
P:  XXXX            SUBSCRIBER
T:  N

# 1+[2-9]11
P:  1               LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P:  [2-9]11         SERVICE
T:  N
U:  Y

# 1+[2-9][02-9]XXXXX
P:  1               LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P:  [2-9][02-9]X    OFFICE-CODE
P:  XXXX            SUBSCRIBER
T:  N

# 1+[2-9]X[02-9]XXXX
P:  1               LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL
P:  [2-9]X[02-9]    OFFICE-CODE
P:  XXXX            SUBSCRIBER
T:  N

Regards,
Wes


On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:

I have need to implement a change to our routing...even though it works as designed.
 
Route filter to catch 7 digit numbers:
(AREA-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND COUNTRY-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND LOCAL-AREA-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL DOES-NOT-EXIST)
 
I'm not sure about the "LOCAL-DIRECT-DIAL DOES-NOT-EXIST" part.  I would think that 7 digit IS local direct dial.  Am I off base here?
 
Erick
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list