[cisco-voip] SAIC doesnt know crap about CIsco

Lelio Fulgenzi lelio at uoguelph.ca
Thu Oct 6 14:18:55 EDT 2011


Ya know, if it was any other pre-fix other than 0 or 9, I can see that happening. But the 0 should have raised an eyebrow or two. 


Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 6, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds like piss poor planning and total lack of communication between all parties involved
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:54 PM, SouthEast Texas Telecom <SETXTELECOM at att.net> wrote:
> OK….I have a question for the brain trust…
> 
>  
> 
> A CISCO system replaces a ROLM CBX…the DIDs has been nxx-06xx and translated inbound by the CBX to 36xx extns…
> 
>  
> 
> SAIC does the CISCO install…..and CHANGES THE EXTENSIONS to (yep!!)   06xx!!!! WHAT THE HELL??
> 
> DON’T TELL ME (and I know the answer…I am doing my CCNA, etc now) that they could NOT do translation and keep the same dialing numbers, etc…
> 
>  
> 
> CAN ANYONE try to justify these idiots??  (I plan to BLAST them at the next stockholders meeting….TOTAL IDIOTS)
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Chris
> 
> (BTW I was the one who did the ROLM in 1981 and added DIDs and PHONEMAIL to it…KEPT the SWITCH up as we added the PM wiring and cabling…and didn’t drop a screw!! Sure enough PM came up with NO downtime in the CBX)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111006/a5aeeea8/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list