[cisco-voip] SAIC doesnt know crap about CIsco
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Thu Oct 6 14:18:55 EDT 2011
Ya know, if it was any other pre-fix other than 0 or 9, I can see that happening. But the 0 should have raised an eyebrow or two.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 6, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like piss poor planning and total lack of communication between all parties involved
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:54 PM, SouthEast Texas Telecom <SETXTELECOM at att.net> wrote:
> OK….I have a question for the brain trust…
>
>
>
> A CISCO system replaces a ROLM CBX…the DIDs has been nxx-06xx and translated inbound by the CBX to 36xx extns…
>
>
>
> SAIC does the CISCO install…..and CHANGES THE EXTENSIONS to (yep!!) 06xx!!!! WHAT THE HELL??
>
> DON’T TELL ME (and I know the answer…I am doing my CCNA, etc now) that they could NOT do translation and keep the same dialing numbers, etc…
>
>
>
> CAN ANYONE try to justify these idiots?? (I plan to BLAST them at the next stockholders meeting….TOTAL IDIOTS)
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris
>
> (BTW I was the one who did the ROLM in 1981 and added DIDs and PHONEMAIL to it…KEPT the SWITCH up as we added the PM wiring and cabling…and didn’t drop a screw!! Sure enough PM came up with NO downtime in the CBX)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111006/a5aeeea8/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list