[cisco-voip] Assistance with call routing question...

[Peter Slow]

...Then you should use the isdn "service" command (i believe that's one of
the keywords) under i THINK the serial/D channel interface to busy out
channels and make sure you've tested every single one of them =)
...Doing that still won't test all your DSPs depending on your hardware
model, but Im assuming those are working unless you added new PVDMs with
the PRI.

-Peter Slow



On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tim Reimers <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>wrote:

> Thanks! ****
>
> ** **
>
> That will do it!!****
>
> For testing purposes, I certainly can just set up things so I have to dial
> “8” and then remove that using PreDot or a translation pattern, etc.****
>
> ** **
>
> I’m only going to do this for a week or so for all my own calls (and those
> of anyone else I can guinea-pig into helping me test..)****
>
> By then, I should have an idea of whether echo is a problem or not.****
>
> ** **
>
> I’m testing carefully because this PRI is going to be used for a
> call-center, public-facing, and I really really don’t want to find out
> there are problems with it****
>
> by having customer service agents telling me that callers are angrily
> hanging up on the agent because they can’t hear them or the agent can’t
> hear the caller…****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Peter Slow [mailto:peter.slow at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 04, 2012 4:38 PM
> *To:* Tim Reimers
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Assistance with call routing question...****
>
> ** **
>
> an h323 GW is all one entitiy from CUCMs perspective. If everything is in
> a single gateway, you'd have to use CUCM to prefic particular digits that
> the GW could then use to send to a particular interface.
>
> How many PRIs are on this gateway, or are the other PRIs on _different_
> gateways?
>
> sounds like you're about to want to prefix somethign on the front of the
> called number, based on the callING number, which this document will show
> you how to do with translation profiles, directly in IOS:****
> Mapping Outbound Calls to Unique FXS/FXO Ports on Analog Gateways****
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801bc341.shtml
>
>
> -Peter Slow
>
>
> ****
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Tim Reimers <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>
> wrote:****
>
> hi all-****
>
>  ****
>
> I should be able to do this myself, but I am experiencing a BSOB (Blue
> screen of Brain) on this simple one—****
>
>  ****
>
> I have a new PRI I want to test for echo and other issues—****
>
> For inbound calling, I already have a DID configured on the PRI and built
> on a couple of phones-****
>
>  ****
>
> I’ve set up a couple of route patterns for specific numbers, and those
> calls do go out this PRI****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> For outbound calling, I’d like to simply set up a couple of phones in such
> a way that the only outside gateway they have access to is this PRI.****
>
>  ****
>
> The gateway router is running this PRI in H.323 mode-  ****
>
>  ****
>
> I think I need to configure a new CSS in such a way that the only PSTN
> access for it would go through this one PRI?****
>
> but I’m stuck on that – ****
>
>  ****
>
> For just one number, I can make the system use that PRI by doing this- ***
> *
>
>  ****
>
> dial-peer voice <myhomephone> pots****
>
> description Local call test on new PRI****
>
> destination-pattern 9<myhomephone>****
>
> progress_ind setup enable 3****
>
> progress_ind alert enable 8****
>
> fax rate disable****
>
> port 0/1/0:23****
>
> forward-digits 7****
>
>  ****
>
> If I expand that dial-peer out to wildcards, it’s going to affect everyone
> on the voice network, not just my test phones…****
>
>  ****
>
> But I’m not certain how to set things up so that –all- calls to and from a
> couple of test phones will always use that one H.323 PRI.****
>
>  ****
>
> There’s another PRI on that same gateway that’s in production, so I can’t
> just switch the config on the entire gateway at large—****
>
>  ****
>
> When I try building a route list, all I can do is select that router and
> “all ports” – unlike MGCP, I don’t have  the granular selection of just
> ports belonging to one Serial interface…****
>
>  ****
>
> Clues, anyone? ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120404/4b619335/attachment.html>