[cisco-voip] Blocking Caller ID
sarjot at googlemail.com
sarjot at googlemail.com
Wed Aug 29 10:06:24 EDT 2012
Yes will do that. I will let u all know how it goes.
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone
-----Original Message-----
From: abbas Wali <abbaseo at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:57:19
To: <sarjot at gmail.com>
Cc: Leslie Meade<Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>; Cisco VOIP<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Blocking Caller ID
sounds right to me,
just to check, you block the CLI on the RP via the Calling Party Trans>CLI
presentation set to restricted, right!!!
On 29 August 2012 14:53, <sarjot at googlemail.com> wrote:
> **
> As Nicholas said i was thinking of copying the Pstn Route Pattern put it
> into a seperate partition and restrict the CLI then create a new CSS which
> include the new partition and assign the CSS to only the user wanting there
> CLI restricted.
>
> Correct meif I am wrong.
> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone
> ------------------------------
> *From: * abbas Wali <abbaseo at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:33 +0100
> *To: *Leslie Meade<Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>
> *Cc: *<sarjot at gmail.com><sarjot at gmail.com>; Cisco VOIP<
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Blocking Caller ID
>
> TP are for incoming numbers!!
>
> it will be interesting to see if we can do that on a per device basis!!
>
> On 29 August 2012 14:18, Leslie Meade <Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com> wrote:
>
>> With mgcp I think the only way is to use translation patterns to hide the
>> clid
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Aug 29, 2012, at 6:03 AM, "sarjot at googlemail.com" <
>> sarjot at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Mgcp gateway.
>> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:57:14
>> > To: sarjot at gmail.com<sarjot at gmail.com>; Cisco VOIP<
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> > Reply-To: Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>
>> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Blocking Caller ID
>> >
>> > mgcp, sip, or h323 gateway?
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "sarjot at googlemail.com" <sarjot at googlemail.com>
>> > To: Cisco VOIP <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:17 AM
>> > Subject: [cisco-voip] Blocking Caller ID
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > What is the best way of restricting sending caller ID for only one
>> department consisting of only 5 users. The rest of the office want to send
>> CLI. I have couple of options in mind but wanted more ideas from the group.
>> Maybe some one may have an easier way of doing it. Any ideas will be
>> appreciated.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
>
> --
> @bbas..
>
>
--
@bbas..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120829/efb0c668/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list