[cisco-voip] phones deleted during user garbage collection
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Thu Feb 9 15:59:58 EST 2012
I'm not sure I like the idea of anything being deleted just because a userID has been deleted from AD. I can see this leading to problems for sure.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Florian Kroessbacher" <florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com>
To: "Eric Pedersen" <PedersenE at bennettjones.com>
Cc: "Cisco List VoIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 3:56:32 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] phones deleted during user garbage collection
i only know this behaviour with remote destination and remote destination profiles.
with normal phones i think this isn't right. what about to contact TAC with your logs. maye it s a defect. we are on version 8.5 i think there isn't this behaviour. before on 7.1 also.
cheers
--
Florian Kroessbacher
gmail: florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com
Am 09.02.2012 um 21:16 schrieb Eric Pedersen < PedersenE at bennettjones.com >:
No, the phones getting deleted are hardware phones with a disabled user as the Owner User ID.
From: Florian Kroessbacher [mailto: florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com ]
Sent: 09 February 2012 12:33 PM
To: Eric Pedersen
Cc: Cisco List VoIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] phones deleted during user garbage collection
do you mean remote destinations as their "phones"
--
Florian Kroessbacher
gmail: florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com
Am 09.02.2012 um 20:24 schrieb Eric Pedersen < PedersenE at bennettjones.com >:
We have Callmanager 8 configured for LDAP synchronization with AD. When users are disabled in Active Directory, the nightly garbage collection is removing them from Callmanager as expected, but it sometimes is also deleting their phones. Has anyone seen this? It happened a couple days ago and I was able to get the Callmanager logs and definitely see the devices being deleted at 3:15. This doesn't seem like correct behavior to me.
Thanks,
Eric
The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures (such as encryption) unless specifically requested.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged
subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact
the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,
e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized
parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please
notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such
notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to
communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures
(such as encryption) unless specifically requested.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120209/719cfe75/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list