[cisco-voip] CUCM 8.6 hardware

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

This could have changed, but from what I understand, Dell's models and components change faster than is common in other manufactures like HP and IBM. This inconsistency of hardware, while fine for consumer applications, might cause issues with enterprise apps. 

Just a thought. They might do things differently now. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Gurtz" <jasongurtz at npumail.com> 
To: "cisco-voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:29:39 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.6 hardware 

> Still no roadmap for Dell. 

I am also intrigued by the lack of Dell validation. We're primarily an HP 
shop, so not really affected here, but it seems odd to me when the #2 (I 
think?) server vendor is explicitly called-out as unsupported. My boss 
says, "maybe Dell doesn't do good enough hardware QC." ;) 

Anyone have insight on the vetting process? 

~JasonG 

_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120119/482d1de3/attachment.html>