[cisco-voip] 79xx vs. 99xx

[Mike King]

Not only 802.3at, but 802.3at with LLDP Power negotiation.   This is NOT
LLDP-MED, it is an extension on LLDP-MED.

Trust me, I'm Labbing the VXC-2000's right now with non-cisco switches.
 Took a while to figure out that not everyone has the "Full" spec
implemented.

Mike

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:

> Note that this is only 802.3at (PoE+).  If you are on older PoE you still
> need the brick.
>
> The product is the VXC-2000 series (
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11499/index.html).
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Mike King wrote:
>
> You are correct, it is a separate purchase.  However, it replaces the
> phones stand, so it is contained inside the footprint of the phone.  It's
> also powered off the spine connector, so the phone powers the zero client.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
>> As far as I understand, there is no zero client built-in, you have to
>> purchase the module to snap on to the back of the phone. Or is there
>> something else?
>>
>> The built in wireless and VPN clients have advantages too.
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone...
>>
>> "There's no place like 127.0.0.1"
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:25 PM, Mike King <me at mpking.com> wrote:
>>
>> One thing to keep in mind is the 9900's do more than Voice and Video.
>>
>> We are seriously considering them because there is an optional zero
>> client built into the phone.  (Virtual Desktop)
>>
>> It's an amazing thought to not only get rid of another box off our desks,
>> but it's also one less power supply to deal with (We'd be deploying with
>> PoE).
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> 2012/3/5 Eric Butcher <Eric.Butcher at cdw.com>
>>
>>> I've been using 9951 for a year or more and it has been fantastic.
>>> Features aren't even a comparison.  Best of all has been the built-in
>>> bluetooth for the headset.  You'd have to pry it from my cold dead hands.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eric Butcher
>>> Cisco Unified Communications Engineer
>>> CDW Professional Services
>>> 11711 N Meridian, Ste 225
>>> Carmel, IN  46032
>>> ( 317.569.4282 – Single Number Reach
>>> ＊ eric.butcher at cdw.com
>>> http://www.cdw.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/5/12 8:30 PM, "Peter Slow" <peter.slow at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >We have a couple hundred 9971s and they work great for both voice and
>>> >video. We're running the standard firmware that comes with 8.6.1.210011.
>>> >(I can check tomorrow)
>>> >I'll agree that theres a very significant "learning curve." they're also
>>> >noticeably slower at times, but you sure can do a lot of stuff with
>>> them.
>>> >
>>> >-Pete
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Sent from my iPhone
>>> >
>>> >On Mar 6, 2012, at 2:09 AM, Frank Arrasmith <frank.arrasmith at gmail.com>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hey all,
>>> >>   just want to poll the room regarding IP Phones they are using.   We
>>> >>recently deployed a large # of 9951/9971 phones, and encountered some
>>> >>pretty serious bugs(that dont have a fix/workaround yet).  Anybody else
>>> >>deploying these?  Are you having bugs in the Call Manager version you
>>> >>are running?  Other than the integrated video, what benefits do you see
>>> >>in them?. I have to say, after working on the 7900 series(sccp) for
>>> some
>>> >>time, with fairly rock solid performance, I am certainly not impressed
>>> >>with the 99xx phones.  I think they are particularly hard to
>>> >>use(compared to the 7900 phones) for someone with Cisco experience, and
>>> >>practically impossible for the average Joe. Maybe I am missing the big
>>> >>picture.  Has anyone seen exceptional benefits from using them? The
>>> >>decision to deploy these was above my head , and supposedly in part to
>>> >>the 7965's going end of life.  Is that true, or did we get suckered by
>>> >>our VAR(i couldnt find an EOL notice).
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> >
>>> >_______________________________________________
>>> >cisco-voip mailing list
>>> >cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120306/3c1e58cb/attachment.html>