[cisco-voip] CUCM SRV records CSCth25928

Ted Nugent tednugent73 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 17:58:11 EST 2012


Does anyone know (have tested) that the multiple hosts on the SIP trunk
will actually provide failover if the primary host goes done? If that's the
case then no need to make a-records right?

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com> wrote:

> That's what I was afraid of... Was allowing multiple host entries in the
> SIP trunk configuration put in place to get around this at least in
> a failover configuration? This "enhancement" has been open for WELL over a
> year!
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Status: Open(Assigned)
>>
>>
>> Not resolved yet.  Use A records as a workaround.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible this is still unresolved or maybe been resolved in a
>> duplicate bug id? HOPEFULLY!
>> Does anyone know if this was resolved by 8.6.2?
>>
>> *CSCth25928 Bug Details*
>>  * Change the behavior for invoking additional DNS SRV queries * *
>> Symptom:*
>> When the Primary server is down CM does not try the second server
>> mentioned in
>> the SRV record.
>> Even when the timer expires it resets the timer and again starts sending
>> the
>> NOTIFY request to Primary DNS SRV record.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121115/41ec04a0/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list