[cisco-voip] Very odd call routing issue.

[Nick Matthews]

debug isdn q931 would be more interesting, though the circuit protocol (nor
IP) were stated.

My first guess is the called party type (International, national, etc).
Default is for callmanager to choose.

Check the difference in messaging between working and not working.

-nick

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Heim, Dennis <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com> wrote:

> Have you tried rebooting? Prior to 8.x there were numerous dial-forest
> corruption issues related to route filters, where the only fix was a
> cluster reboot.****
>
> ** **
>
> Dennis Heim****
>
> Sr. UC Engineer****
>
> World Wide Technology****
>
> Office: 314.212.1814****
>
> Email: dennis.heim at wwt.com****
>
> www.wwt.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Robin Clayton
> *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2012 5:41 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Very odd call routing issue.****
>
> ** **
>
> I have determined that the route filter seems to be the cause of the issue.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> If I specify a route pattern as ****
>
>  ****
>
> 901768@****
>
>  ****
>
> and have the route filter set the call fails.****
>
>  ****
>
> Without the route filter it connects.****
>
>  ****
>
> Very very odd.****
>
>  ****
>
> Rob****
>
>  ****
>
> *=========================*****
>
> *Robin Clayton*****
>
> * *****
>
> *Network Transition Manager*****
>
> *Richard Rose Federation*****
>
> *Richard Rose Central Academy*****
>
> *Victoria Place*****
>
> *Carlisle*****
>
> *Cumbria*****
>
> *CA1 1LY*****
>
> * *****
>
> *Tel: 01228 822075*****
>
> *www: www.rrfa.org.uk*****
>
> * *****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Pavan [mailto:pav.ccie at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 27 September 2012 14:04
> *To:* Robin Clayton
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Very odd call routing issue.****
>
>  ****
>
> How about asking the carrier.****
>
> Can they answer why one works and the other fails ?
>
> -Pavan****
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2012, at 6:57, Robin Clayton <Robin.Clayton at rrfa.org.uk> wrote:
> ****
>
> TON?****
>
>  ****
>
> It works for 99% of UK Numbers as far as I can tell, just a sub set from
> one exchange seems to be being strange…****
>
>  ****
>
> Rob****
>
>  ****
>
> *=========================*****
>
> *Robin Clayton*****
>
> * *****
>
> *Network Transition Manager*****
>
> *Richard Rose Federation*****
>
> *Richard Rose Central Academy*****
>
> *Victoria Place*****
>
> *Carlisle*****
>
> *Cumbria*****
>
> *CA1 1LY*****
>
> * *****
>
> *Tel: 01228 822075*****
>
> *www: www.rrfa.org.uk*****
>
> * *****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Paul [mailto:asobihoudai at yahoo.com]
> *Sent:* 27 September 2012 12:52
> *To:* Robin Clayton
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Very odd call routing issue.****
>
>  ****
>
> Perhaps ToN is required and you haven't configured that on the RL/RP?****
>
>  ****
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Robin Clayton <Robin.Clayton at rrfa.org.uk>
> *To:* "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2012 6:02 AM
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Very odd call routing issue.****
>
>  ****
>
> CCM 7.x****
>
> 2811 Voice gateway.****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> A few weeks ago a member of staff alerted me to the fact that they could
> not call a supplier, I checked the number and sure enough the phone system
> dialled and we got a recorded message from the carrier ( BT UK ) of number
> not recognised.****
>
>  ****
>
> After a bunch of tests with our line provider we could not find a fault
> with their call routing ( at least so far )****
>
>  ****
>
> What I have noticed is something that seems very bazar****
>
>  ****
>
> With no special routing implemented on the call manager the voice gateway
> tries to dial and gets the number not recognised. The output of “show voice
> call” shows the following with the correct number.****
>
>  ****
>
> ==============================================================****
>
> 0/0/0:15 13****
>
>       vtsp level 0 state = S_SETUP_PROGRESS****
>
> callid 0xBAEE B13 state S_TSP_OUTCALL_PROG clld 01768776000 cllg 6563****
>
> ==============================================================****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> If I add a CCM route pattern for 901768776000, the line rings and the
> progress display shows the correct number.****
>
>  ****
>
> ==============================================================****
>
> 0/0/0:15 13****
>
>       vtsp level 0 state = S_SETUP_REQ_PROC****
>
> callid 0xBAEE B13 state S_TSP_OUTCALL_PROG clld 01768776000 cllg 6563****
>
> ============================================================****
>
>  ****
>
> in both instances “Show Call” show the right number , but one fails? ****
>
>  ****
>
> This is driving me crazy, anybody have any bright ideas other than
> sticking in a route pattern for the whole number set?****
>
>  ****
>
> Rob****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *=========================*****
>
> *Robin Clayton*****
>
> * *****
>
> *Network Transition Manager*****
>
> *Richard Rose Federation*****
>
> *Richard Rose Central Academy*****
>
> *Victoria Place*****
>
> *Carlisle*****
>
> *Cumbria*****
>
> *CA1 1LY*****
>
> * *****
>
> *Tel: 01228 822075*****
>
> *www: **www.rrfa.org.uk*****
>
> * *****
>
>  ****
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ****
>
> *Important Notice:*****
>
> This e-mail and any attachment are confidentialand may be privileged
> or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is solely intended for the
> person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> reading, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of all or parts of this
> e-mail or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
> replying to this message or by telephone and delete this e-mail and
> any attachments permanently from your system. ****
>
> *The Richard Rose Federation <http://www.rrfa.org.uk/>* ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ****
>
> *Important Notice:*****
>
> This e-mail and any attachment are confidentialand may be privileged
> or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is solely intended for the
> person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> reading, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of all or parts of this
> e-mail or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
> replying to this message or by telephone and delete this e-mail and
> any attachments permanently from your system. ****
>
> *The Richard Rose Federation <http://www.rrfa.org.uk>* ****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ****
>
> *Important Notice:*****
>
> This e-mail and any attachment are confidentialand may be privileged
> or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is solely intended for the
> person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> reading, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of all or parts of this
> e-mail or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
> replying to this message or by telephone and delete this e-mail and
> any attachments permanently from your system. ****
>
> *The Richard Rose Federation <http://www.rrfa.org.uk>* ****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120928/0b63c520/attachment.html>