[cisco-voip] quick question about sip and CUBE

[Kenneth Hayes]

503 is a carrier issue with the service.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com> wrote:

We got that working but I think we have another issue that I'm not sure how
to verify.

I didn't change any of the dial-peers pointing to the CUCM yet, I have only
modified the one trunk to use port 5070 so it will not interfere with the
current trunk for inbound.

Now we get a 503 service unavailable for calls from the remote system.
Will I need to change my existing dial-peers to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 before
I add any dial-peers for use on the new trunk that uses 5070?  All inbound
worked fine until I added this second trunk.


On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've seen this configuration before - sometimes certain call flows require
> MTP for devices/integrations on the CUCM side.  You don't have to set up
> multiple listening ports on CUBE, as it's indifferent. On CUCM the two
> trunks have different source ports. If it's outbound from CUCM only that
> matters, no CUBE changes are required. If you need inbound calls to have
> MTP only for certain calls changing the port is the best way.
>
> I believe with SIP trunks CUCM will not allow two trunks to the same
> address with the same source port, but it will allow you with H.323
> gateways. However, the choice of which of those gateways is basically
> random and you may think there are two but it's only using one, but that's
> a H.323 caveat.
>
> -nick
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Doh.  I forgot about changing the port.
>>
>> I think that answers my question.  I can have one trunk on 5060 for  site
>> to site calls w/ MTP and one trunk to 5061 for least cost routing from/to
>> other sites.
>>
>> This seems like it will suit our needs perfectly.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Anthony Holloway <
>> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What's your ultimate goal that you want/need two trunks to a single CUBE?
>>>
>>> So in CUBE you would do something like this:
>>>
>>> dial-peer voice 1 voip
>>>  description Trunk 1
>>>  session protocol sipv2
>>>  destination-pattern 1...$
>>>  session-target ipv4:10.1.1.1:5061
>>> !
>>> dial-peer voice 2 voip
>>>  description Trunk 2
>>>  session protocol sipv2
>>>  destination-pattern 2...$
>>>  session-target ipv4:10.1.1.1:5062
>>> !
>>>
>>> And then in CUCM you would need to create two new SIP Trunk Security
>>> Profiles (Found under System > Security in 8.6), specifying the port in
>>> which CUCM should expect to receive the messages.  Create your two trunks
>>> pointing to the CUBE, using respective SIP Trunk security profiles, and
>>> that's how you force an inbound trunk.
>>>
>>> As for the MTP question: You can require MTP for all calls, which can be
>>> good and bad.  That's no different from H323 trunks to gateways.  The
>>> require only when needed comes in to play for SIP Early Offer only.  And
>>> that's a matter of the calling device and whether or not CUCM receives its
>>> capabilities or has to make something up using an MTP's capbilities.  DTMF
>>> relay mismatch (Out of band versus In band) is a different story, and
>>> there's no check box for that.  That's simply a function of the Media
>>> Manager and the MRGL on the SIP trunk, which will correct DTMF mismatches
>>> automatically by dynamically using an MTP as needed.  So, three different
>>> things going on there.
>>>
>>> I hope that helped explain it a bit more.  Maybe someone else will fill
>>> in some of my gaps.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If I have two sip trunks from CUCM to CUBE (one which requires MTP and
>>>> one which does not) how does the CUBE or CUCM know which trunk settings to
>>>> use for inbound calls to CUCM?
>>>>
>>>> Is it best to make all of the inbound settings the same and do all of
>>>> the translations on the CUBE or CUCM translation patterns instead of
>>>> setting the significant digits?
>>>>
>>>> I'm also remembering someone telling me a while back that if you
>>>> uncheck the MTP Required that th etrunk will still allocate MTP if needed.
>>>> Is that correct?  It would allow me to only use the one trunk with
>>>> translations.
>>>>
>>>> As always, thanks for the help!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130409/488cd8e2/attachment.html>