[cisco-voip] Can't update PAB, fast dials from phones

Fri Apr 12 12:09:57 EDT 2013

You'd think that, but then you look at the bug lists, where main features don't work on the official releases, like BAT, or mobility.

From: Eric Pedersen [mailto:PedersenE at bennettjones.com]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 10:04 AM
To: Nate VanMaren; Wes Sisk
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Can't update PAB, fast dials from phones

Touché. :)

In my defense though, the reason we're on 9.1 at the moment is because of other problems with an 8.6 ES we had before. I prefer official releases as much as possible; I'm sure they're regression tested much more than ES's.

Eric

From: Nate VanMaren [mailto:VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org]
Sent: 11 April 2013 2:34 PM
To: Eric Pedersen; Wes Sisk
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Can't update PAB, fast dials from phones

If you're afraid of ES's you shouldn't be on 9.1 :)

Just take a look at the readme for one of the ES, they're fixing lots and lots of things.

-Nate

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Pedersen
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:53 PM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can't update PAB, fast dials from phones

Wes,

Yes TAC offered an ES, but I'd rather keep that as a last resort since upgrading CUCM is significant amount of work and testing  Do you know what phone models have problems? We have a mix of 9971s and 7975s (SCCP).

Thank you,
Eric

From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
Sent: 10 April 2013 2:18 PM
To: Eric Pedersen
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can't update PAB, fast dials from phones

TAC won't provide clear answer because manually pointing (overriding the default) isn't extensively tested. It *should* work. When last I checked there was still some inconsistency in how the various phone models used internal vs. external provisioned URL's. That is to say your mileage may vary and careful attention is required.

TAC should have offered you an engineering special to resolve that bug. Did they? Is there a reason a CUCM ES upgrade is not a viable solution for you?

Regards,
Wes

On Apr 10, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Eric Pedersen <PedersenE at bennettjones.com<mailto:PedersenE at bennettjones.com>> wrote:

We upgraded to the latest CUCM 9.1 (9.1.1.20000-5) and now people cannot edit their personal address book and fast dials from their phone, which is especially problematic since fast dial functionality was taken out of the user pages.  This is a known bug, CSCue60831, that the PAB cannot be updated from CUCM subscribers.  Can I change the Personal Directory phone service to use the URL on the publisher, i.e. "http://<Pub IP>:8080/ccmpd/pdCheckLogin.do?name=#DEVICENAME#<http://%3cPub%20IP%3e:8080/ccmpd/pdCheckLogin.do?name=#DEVICENAME#>"? Will I run into any problems? I didn't get a clear answer from TAC.

Thanks,
Eric

The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged

subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact

the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,

e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized

parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please

notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such

notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to

communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures

(such as encryption) unless specifically requested.

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged

subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact

the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,

e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized

parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please

notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such

notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to

communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures

(such as encryption) unless specifically requested.

NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged

subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact

the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,

e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized

parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please

notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such

notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to

communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures

(such as encryption) unless specifically requested.

 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130412/8ed33aff/attachment.html>