[cisco-voip] VG350 Gateway ... anyone deployed this yet?

[Nick Matthews]

It's cheaper per-port than the VG224, by about 10-15% last time I ran then
numbers.  Plus you get less management points. The cards also have some
nice features - passthrough FXO, some higher voltages on certain ports, etc.

The snag a few people have hit is that it requires 8.6.2, there's no .cop
file to apply it to 8.5 and previous versions.

-nick


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>
> Has anyone deployed a VG350 gateway recently? I believe it was announced
> only last summer. It's a high density analog gateway, part of the VGXXX
> family. It's a 3900 series router with high density voice modules on it.
>
> I still have to do a port cost analysis, but thought I'd ask about
> experience. Some advantages I see are one device configuration and only one
> (or two with redundancy) uplink ports needed. Power savings may be a wash,
> not sure yet. Of course, with one device, comes one point of failure.
>
> Any thoughts would be welcome.
>
> Lelio
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130420/2576fc09/attachment.html>