[cisco-voip] Differences between DRS and CDR SFTP activities

[Ryan Ratliff]

What do the logs for CDR Repository Manager (or CDR Agent, I don't recall offhand which one does the sftp) say about why it's failing?   The only immediate difference I can think of is the nature of the files being written though that doesn't really explain why filesystem ownership has an impact.

-Ryan

On Feb 22, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:


So, we've set up an SFTP server on a linux box and setup a (mounted) filesystem where a user is not the owner, but part of the group that has rw access. WinSCP works fine, user is able to write files. DRS is fine, backups work fine. CDR billing server does not work, transfers fail with partially written files and then others don't go through at all.

The only way we got CDR transfers to work, was when use used a local filesystem where the user was the owner used a user owned the mounted filesystem it worked. Again, DRS works fine without any of these issues.

Can anyone speak to the nuances between the DRS SFTP process and the CDR SFTP process and why one would work and one would not?



---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130222/b998c685/attachment.html>