[cisco-voip] SIP CUBE Caller ID

Thu Jan 10 16:23:12 EST 2013

What I was looking for, but didn't see in your TXT file, is the SIP INVITE from CUCM includes the calling party name in the FROM field to CUBE, and CUBE includes the same FROM name to Siemens. Assuming that is true, Siemens appears to be disregarding the name portion of the FROM field by not only failing to display it, but completely removing it in 1XX responses. It would be nice if it processed PAI but I think the name is being stripped and then Siemens just assumes there is no name for the call, as if PAI didn't exist.

On Jan 10, 2013, at 3:56 PM, "Heim, Dennis" <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com> wrote:

> This is outbound from CUCM. I dial the number it connects and the display just shows the dialed number, without the name. I did not have a display name on my phone, when I fixed that, the caller id name is visible to the siemens pbx.
>  
> The problem still is that I dial a number and it does not put in the name
>  
> The Cisco-Siemens direction, we see Cisco set the From with the name (From: “Cisco Phone” sip:5987800 at ip. We also see the P-Asserted-Identity set to “Cisco Phone” sip:5987800 at ip.
>  
> On the invite coming back from the siemens we see it set the From, only contain the number. However, the P-Asserted-Identity, contains the caller id name.
>  
> From: Heim, Dennis 
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:46 PM
> To: 'Kenneth Hayes'; Voice_VT
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] SIP CUBE Caller ID
>  
> This is outbound from CUCM. I dial the number it connects and the display just shows the dialed number, with the name. I did not have a display name on my phone, when I fixed that, the caller id name is visible to the siemens pbx.
>  
> The problem still is that I dial a number and it does not put in the name.
>  
> From: Kenneth Hayes [mailto:kennethwhayes at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:29 PM
> To: Heim, Dennis
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP CUBE Caller ID
>  
> This is inbound correct?
> 
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Heim, Dennis <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com> wrote:
> It is showing in the PAI, but not the from field.
>  
> Call-ID: C2451EA-5A9611E2-92D3F143-739C4300 at 10.98.254.51
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Timestamp: 1357847526
> Content-Length: 0
>  
>  
> Jan 10 19:52:06.991: //184752/427582000000/SIP/Info/sipSPICheckResponseExt: INVITE response with no RSEQ - disable IS_REL1XX
> Jan 10 19:52:06.991: //184752/427582000000/SIP/State/sipSPIChangeState: 0x2472CB8 : State change from (STATE_SENT_INVITE, SUBSTATE_NONE)  to (STATE_RECD_PROCEEDING, SUBSTATE_PROCEEDING_PROCEEDING)
> Jan 10 19:52:07.119: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Info/HandleUdpIPv4SocketReads: Msg enqueued for SPI with IP addr: [10.98.88.38]:5060, local_address:[10.98.254.51]
> Jan 10 19:52:07.119: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Info/ccsip_process_sipspi_queue_event: ccsip_spi_get_msg_type returned: 2 for event 1
> Jan 10 19:52:07.119: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Transport/sipTransportProcessNWNewConnMsg: context=0x0
> Jan 10 19:52:07.119: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Info/ccsip_new_msg_preprocessor: Checking Invite Dialog
> Jan 10 19:52:07.119: //184752/427582000000/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Received:
> SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
> Call-ID: C2451EA-5A9611E2-92D3F143-739C4300 at 10.98.254.51
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> From: sip:XXXX7800 at 10.210.61.43;tag=802E4C74-179B
> To: <sip:18077005 at 10.98.88.38>;tag=SEC11-a58620a-1e58d20a-1-zvE1E7A74E0q
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.98.254.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5C1C8C
> Contact: <sip:18077005 at 10.98.88.38:5060;maddr=10.98.88.38>
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:52:29 GMT
> P-Asserted-Identity: "My Name" <sip:8077005 at 10.98.88.38>
> Content-Length: 0
>  
> From: Mark Holloway [mailto:mh at markholloway.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:51 PM
> To: Heim, Dennis
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP CUBE Caller ID
>  
> The FROM field should have a name in front of the phone number. (Like the bottom line of text in this capture).  Can you send the SIP INVITE from CUCM > CUBE, and from CUBE to the PBX?  
>  
> <image001.png>
>  
>  
>  
> On Jan 10, 2013, at 1:26 PM, "Heim, Dennis" <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com> wrote:
>  
> 
> I am doing a sip integration to a pbx. We are not getting the caller id name/number when a call is placed form cisco to the pbx via the cube. We do see the caller id name in the debugs, but not on the phone display.
>  
> Received:
> SIP/2.0 200 OK
> Call-ID: CD2B18C9-5A8011E2-80D5F143-739C4300 at 10.98.254.51
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> From: <sip:XXXXXXXXXX at 10.98.254.51>;tag=7FA30F9C-154B
> To: <sip:18077014 at osv1.XXX.com>;tag=SEC21-a58620a-1e58d20a-2-1e9kU4nFr1Kp
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.98.254.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK456B7
> Contact: <sip:18077014 at 10.210.88.39:5060;maddr=10.210.88.39>
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 367
> X-Siemens-Call-Type: ST-insecure
> Accept-Language: en;q=0.0
> Allow: REGISTER, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, NOTIFY, REFER, INFO
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:20:27 GMT
> P-Asserted-Identity: "My Name" <sip:8077014 at 10.210.88.39>
>  
> What am I missing?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130110/d980a68e/attachment.html>