[cisco-voip] Polycom Analog or IP

[Ryan Ratliff]

On a somewhat-related topic has anyone tried the new 8831 yet?   

I'd love to hear feedback if so.

-Ryan

On Jul 12, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Jason Faraone <JFaraone at paulo.com> wrote:

I stopped deploying analog Polycoms in favor of Cisco 7937s and have been much happier. Having a softkey template is handy for joining conferences, etc. To take it a step further, I deployed one of these over a year ago and it’s been performing like a champ. It is configured as a “basic” SIP device so you don’t get any advanced features, but it’s wireless and comes with a couple satellite mics.
 
http://revolabs.com/Products/Product-Line/FLX-Wireless-Conference-Phone.aspx
 
 
 
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Zhars
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 8:06 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Polycom Analog or IP
 
My boss is pushing hard for a Polycom for a conference room....ok whatever, let's make him happy!

I have an ATA-187 still in the box.  So I could get an Analog version, though it looks like the 187 doesn't handle POE, so I'll need to have it near a power source.

Is it better to just get the IP versions and set it up for SIP?  Anyone have any experiences either way and did it bring happiness?  ;-)

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130712/d138fb40/attachment.html>