[cisco-voip] Outgoing cLI

[Ryan Ratliff]

In the first two the calling numbers are different, are either of those your main number, or are they the number you expected to be sent?

-Ryan

On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:12 AM, costas georgiou <ckos1976 at hotmail.com> wrote:

The first two debugs are from an MGCP gateway which is only passing the main number not the individual extension.  The last one is passing the correct digits.  They are both outgoing,  all extensions are 7 digits.
 
un 21 08:27:26.254: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x1B5C
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
                Exclusive, Channel 31
        Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '02082696700'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
        Called Party Number i = 0x80, '01212548185'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
Jun 21 08:27:26.438: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x9B5C
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
 

un 21 08:34:17.500: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x1B62
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839C
                Exclusive, Channel 28
        Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '2036132'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
        Called Party Number i = 0x80, '07825015577'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
Jun 21 08:34:17.704: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x9B62
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839C
                Exclusive, Channel 28
Jun 21 08:34:19.580: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x1B63

***********************************************************************
 Working
*Jun 21 09:19:09.201: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x00CD
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
                Exclusive, Channel 31
        Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '02078223798'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
        Called Party Number i = 0x80, '07976596466'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
*Jun 21 09:19:09.401: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x80CD
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
                Exclusive, Channel 31
 
> From: rkulagow at gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:19:33 -0500
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Outgoing cLI
> To: ckos1976 at hotmail.com
> CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> 
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:29 AM, costas georgiou <ckos1976 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have an MGCP and a H323 gateway and I am trying to send out the correct
> > number. When a call is made it sends out the main number i.e. receptions
> > number rather than the users extension. CLI is enabled by the provider.
> > The outbound call Calling party presentation is set to default and so is the
> > Route group. I have even amended that to Allow but still not sending the
> > correct digits.
> 
> You said that you have both MGCP and H.323. Which gateway are your
> outbound calls using?
> 
> Do a "debug isdn q931" and then a "term mon" and capture the output of
> an outbound call.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130621/de09f4d1/attachment.html>