[cisco-voip] Cisco Voice AND M$ Lync

[Brent Pollock]

That was part of point, I don't want to bash Lync. I never enjoy vendor
bashing and it would be hypocritical of me to do so. I am just trying to
find the best implementation path for the environment without sacrificing
end user experience. I am also wanting to limit the complex while avoiding
buggy integration. I have been part of some discussion about the future of
RCC and CUCI-lync by Cisco, any evidence to suggest these may cease to
exist?


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Gregory Wenzel <gwenzit at gmail.com> wrote:

> it was mentioned to me during the iselin NJ partner SE  Collaboration
> Bootcamp. I cant share the documents because of the agreement we have as a
> partner. I would show the benefits of Jabber rather than bash MS Lync.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Brent Pollock <hashtagvoip at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Interesting, I missed that. Where can I find that statement?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Gregory Wenzel <gwenzit at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Cisco has stated not to go head to head with lync. show only the
>>> positives of Jabber because lync is a better product than Jabber.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Brent Pollock <hashtagvoip at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Anyone out there fight the Lync vs Jabber battle? Currently working on
>>>> a presentation on features of both as well as what can be delivered using
>>>> both. Anyone care to share suggestions or reference material?
>>>>
>>>> TIA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Greg Wenzel, CCNP Voice
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Greg Wenzel, CCNP Voice
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130322/18cf4585/attachment.html>