[cisco-voip] e164 Dialplan & UC Application Version Support

[Heim, Dennis]

I'd assume with the premium edition it's the same as before where what is listed in the directory for phone number needs to match exactly for status what is configured as the line... aka no "-", "(", ")".

Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814

PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.


From: Boon [mailto:ciscovoipuser at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 8:06 AM
To: Heim, Dennis
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e164 Dialplan & UC Application Version Support

CUACP

Cisco Unified Attendant Console Premium version... the new one which provides the long over due redundancy!!!

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Heim, Dennis <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com<mailto:Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>> wrote:
UCCX does not support the +. CUC only supports the plus on alternative extensions.

What is CUACP?

Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814<tel:314-212-1814>

PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Boon
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:51 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] e164 Dialplan & UC Application Version Support

I'm looking to use + dialing in my next customer dialplan design.

Could anyone tell me if there are any restrictions with deploying e164 with + dialing for the following application versions:
CUACP 9.1
CUCM 8.6
CUC 8.6
UCCX 8.5
CUPS 8.6

Thanks


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131101/68604335/attachment.html>