[cisco-voip] CUCM 9.x ELM and Owner ID
Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
rratliff at cisco.com
Tue Oct 8 10:41:25 EDT 2013
I recommend when looking at the User Count Tool or whatever tool you are using to do your license migration (before the upgrade) you should count your public space phones as a separate user that will require a license.
I understand Licensing is being very generous for current migrations however I would pay careful attention to what you ask for and what you get as compared to what you currently pay for so there are no big surprises at your next renewal.
-Ryan
On Oct 8, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Tim Smith <tim.smith at enject.com.au<mailto:tim.smith at enject.com.au>>
wrote:
Thanks Ryan
Does that mean we should ask licensing for a public space lic per em phone?
We don't actually need to buy more licenses right?
Cheers,
Tim
On 9 Oct 2013, at 1:09 am, "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com<mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>> wrote:
As soon as you add SNR or a soft client to those users you have to double up on licenses to account for the public space phones.
Today that is the solution and when doing your DLU to ELM conversion you need to plan accordingly.
-Ryan
On Oct 7, 2013, at 7:33 PM, Tim Smith <tim.smith at enject.com.au<mailto:tim.smith at enject.com.au>> wrote:
Thanks Joe,
I have seen that one before, I’m not sure that is the same issue.
This is in regard to the physical phones not been allocated to a user. (i.e. assigning phones owner ID’s)
This seems to cause a double up for me when I create CSF profiles.
Cheers,
Tim
From: Joe Martini [mailto:joemar2 at cisco.com<http://cisco.com/>]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2013 10:08 AM
To: Tim Smith
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9.x ELM and Owner ID
Versions of CUCM that contain the fix for CSCue14471 no longer have this issue.
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCue14471
Joe
On Oct 7, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Tim Smith <tim.smith at enject.com.au<mailto:tim.smith at enject.com.au>> wrote:
Hi guys,
I’ve seen some discussion on this already
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/voip/172472?search_string=owner%20cuwl;#172472
Most clients do not assign owner ID as they use extension mobility.
(I will admit it is true that a lot of mobility users actually stay logged into the same phone and we could technically assign them as the owner)
Either way, I keep ending up with my licensing in ELM being out of balance due to having phones and CSF’s.
The TAC answer to me was that I should assign an owner ID.
Am I missing something here? Is there another solution?
Cheers,
Tim.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131008/791e8eaf/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list