[cisco-voip] Prefix for Missed Calls

[Ed Leatherman]

Mike, thanks for posting that link, good explanation; makes me want to
clean up the dial plan on our own systems a bit.

Is it a common situation for service providers to just set all calls as
"National" in the US now? I wasn't able to observe any international calls
coming in so perhaps those come in with the correct type - but local calls
definitely show up for me as national.


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mike <mikeeo at msn.com> wrote:

> This is done by using transformation patterns.****
>
> ** **
>
> Start with this link and read all 3 parts.
>
> ****
>
>
> http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2009/12/07/building-global-dial-plans-in-cucm7-part-i-globalization/
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> If you need help let me know.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Lisa Notarianni
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:31 AM
>
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Prefix for Missed Calls****
>
> ** **
>
> (Call Manager 8.6.6)****
>
> ** **
>
> Has anyone ever successfully utilized translation patterns to prefix 91 so
> that when *Dial* is pressed in *Missed or Received Calls*, it will
> automatically populate the 91 for calls that were missed or received from
> outside of network callers?****
>
> ** **
>
> We had done some testing but it caused an overlap in route patterns which
> therefore caused a timeout delay for internal calling.****
>
> ** **
>
> Here is what we built:****
>
> ** **
>
> {2-9]xx xxx xxxx would automatically add 91 prefix****
>
> [2-9]xxx Is for internal calling****
>
> ** **
>
> If an internal call was made for example to 4357,  Call Manager would wait
> to see if the caller was done dialing and after about 15 seconds it would
> time out and then the call would go through.  The system was comparing the
> 2 route patterns above and was not sure which was being used which caused
> the delay.****
>
> ** **
>
> I know there are other suggested ways of accomplishing this but if there
> is a workaround to Cisco’s preferred way of showing 91 prefix on each
> incoming call we would rather that.****
>
>
> Thank you in advance.****
>
>
> Lisa****
>
> [image: LisaNotarianniSignature]****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


-- 
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130913/bbfeec8a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 10828 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130913/bbfeec8a/attachment.gif>