[cisco-voip] PUT and CUCM 9.x

[Erick Wellnitz]

That makes sense in a Cisco sort of way.


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Loraditch <
MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

>  No PAKs with 9.x. The license migration wizard in 9.1.2 requires a
> Contract Number if you have UCSS or an SO if you purchased the upgrade. GLO
> then checks that stuff when they manually process your request for 9.x
> licenses.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
>
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
> Timonium, MD 21093
>
> voice. 410.252.8830
> fax.  410.252.9284
>
> Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech>  |  Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296>
> | Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>  |  Email Support<support at heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, September 13, 2013 11:43 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] PUT and CUCM 9.x****
>
> ** **
>
> I think I might be missing something obvious...****
>
>  ****
>
> I ordered my CUCM 9.x upgrade from PUT but I don't see any claim
> certificates.  Did I order the wrong thing?****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks!****
>
>  ****
>
> -E****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130913/e7abaaf4/attachment.html>