[cisco-voip] Replacement for old 7815-i3 for unity connection 8.6

[Robin Clayton]

Hi Matthew

BE6K does look like a reasonable option, but is there an upgrade path from our existing configuration or is it a total rebuild I can't seem to find documentation on it.

Thanks

Rob





From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: 24 September 2013 16:19
To: Robin Clayton; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Replacement for old 7815-i3 for unity connection 8.6

MCS servers are almost completely sold out, only a few models remain at random distributors worldwide and the 3rd party options are from my understanding are also no longer available.

Your best and recommended option is to go Virtual. You have 3rd party virtualization options, but I would say go BE6K. See here: http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_in_a_Virtualized_Environment


Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA

1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093

voice. 410.252.8830
fax.  410.252.9284

Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech>  |  Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296>  | Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>  |  Email Support<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robin Clayton
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:05 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Replacement for old 7815-i3 for unity connection 8.6

Dear all ,

We are looking to upgrade from UCX 7.1.x to 8.6

I understand our 7815-i3 is not supported on 8.x

I can't work out exactly what the best replacement is,

The MCS's listed here

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/supported_platforms/8xcucspl.html#wp760981

Are all EOL with IBM .


Is the UCS-C210M2 suitable for a non-virtualised platform?

Alternatively I also want to investigate virtualising this server and an old 7816 running CUCM 7.1 going to 8.6  and the above server on one platform.



We have les than 150 handsets and less than 100 mailboxes.

Anyone gone through this?



Rob


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Important Notice:

This e-mail and any attachment are confidentialand may be privileged
or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is solely intended for the
person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any
reading, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of all or parts of this
e-mail or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
replying to this message or by telephone and delete this e-mail and
any attachments permanently from your system.
The Richard Rose Federation<http://www.rrfa.org.uk>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Important Notice:

This e-mail and any attachment are confidentialand may be privileged
or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is solely intended for the
person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any
reading, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of all or parts of this
e-mail or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
replying to this message or by telephone and delete this e-mail and
any attachments permanently from your system.

The Richard Rose Federation<http://www.rrfa.org.uk>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130925/b0efa7c1/attachment.html>