[cisco-voip] UC on UCS storage.....

[Scott Voll]

and how many VM's are they putting on a C series?

Scott


On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Tommy Schlotterer <
tschlotterer at netechcorp.com> wrote:
>
>  We have our data center guys run an iops test VM to determine whether or
> not the storage is provide the required iops, and we recommend that the
> customer is  already experienced with a storage environment. We don't want
> an admin accidentally bringing the storage array down.
>
> C series is the recommendation unless its a high end enterprise customer.
>
> Tommy
>
> Sent from my phone.
> On Dec 17, 2014 9:44 PM, Josh Warcop <josh at warcop.com> wrote:
>   All good until our storage guy messed up the NFS permissions and the
> call manager died.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>  ------------------------------
> From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Sent: ‎12/‎17/‎2014 7:16 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS storage.....
>
>  I just found this:
> http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/UC_Virtualization_Supported_Hardware#Storage
>
>  Looks like all the protocols are supported.  FCoE, iSCSI, NFS for 3rd
> party.
>
>  Anyone running any of this in production and care to put in your two
> cents?
>
>  Scott
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK planning storage requirements for UC on UCS upgrade from 8.6(physical)
>  to 10.5(vm)
>
>  we are looking at 2 CM nodes, 1 UC, 1 UCCx, one CER, PLM, PCD, and
> presence.  The way I see it from the VM doc's it looks like I need about 1
> TB of storage and roughly 8k IOPS.  What Protocols are supported?  FCoE?
> iSCSI? NFS?  The only thing I have found thus far is FC.
>
>  Can anyone confirm that IO and Storage looks reasonable?  and let me
> know which protocol's are TAC supported?
>
>  Thanks
>
>  Scott
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20141218/3b993403/attachment.html>