[cisco-voip] poll: SCCP or SIP integration with large UCM and CUC cluster

[Tim Frazee]

True. with SCCP, you can assign capabilities per port.

for the record, I was talking about the voicemail integration between UCM
and CUC, not end points. I think thats pretty clear which path C is taking.


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> I can't be 100% sure, but I like SCCP integrations because you can create
> a number of ports groups so you can 'reserve' ports for a particular usage.
> For example, if I have 100 ports, I start auto-attendant first, then VM
> then call processing.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Tim Frazee" <tfrazee at gmail.com>
> *To: *cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 30, 2014 10:10:31 AM
>
> *Subject: *[cisco-voip] poll: SCCP or SIP integration with large UCM and
> CUC        cluster
>
> any opinions either way?
>
> I've always done SCCP, but I'll have 2x 20k CUC clusters soon and wasnt
> sure if there was a better way of doing it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140130/fc2ea4ba/attachment.html>