[cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)

Hughes, Scott GRE-MG SHughes at GREnergy.com
Wed Jul 9 02:02:11 EDT 2014


I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support.


On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, "Anthony Holloway" <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com<mailto:avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>> wrote:

It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models.  E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224.  Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products.

Check here:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708


On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR <grccie at gmail.com<mailto:grccie at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Guys,

Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/im&p on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead?

Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5?

Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great.

-gr

Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from
Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended
only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in 
error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the
information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and
delete the original message.


 




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list